One and Two-visit Root Canal Retreatment
One and Two-visit Root Canal Retreatment in Teeth With Periapical Lesion
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Izmir, Turkey
- Ege university
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- with a non-contributory medical history,
- single-rooted teeth with periapical lesions,
- previously root canal treated but no reduction in the lesion after the treatment
- diagnosed as asymptomatic apical periodontitis
Exclusion Criteria:
- clinical symptoms, drainage,
- more than 5 mm loss of periodontal attachment,
- non-restorable tooth
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: One visit root canal retreatment
The teeth were treated in one-visit (OV) root canal retreatment.
Final root canal irrigation was performed with 5% EDTA, followed by 2.5% NaOCl and received an additional final rinse with 2% CHX before obturation.
|
The teeth were treated in one-visit (OV) root canal retreatment.
Final root canal irrigation was performed with 5% EDTA, followed by 2.5% NaOCl and received an additional final rinse with 2% CHX before obturation
|
|
Active Comparator: Two visit root canal retreatment
The teeth were treated in two visit (TV) root canal retreatment.
After completion of root canal instrumentation, calcium hydroxide (CH) paste was placed into the root canal.
In second visit, all root canals were irrigated with 5% EDTA followed by 2.5% NaOCl before obturation.
|
The teeth were treated in two visit (TV) root canal retreatment.
After completion of root canal instrumentation, calcium hydroxide (CH) paste was placed into the root canal.
In second visit, all root canals were irrigated with 5% EDTA followed by 2.5% NaOCl before obturation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The presence or absence of clinical symptoms in clinical examination
Time Frame: 24 months
|
All patients were called for follow up visits.
The evaluation was performed by clinical examination.
Clinical symptoms including presence of pain, tenderness to percussion and palpation, presence of sinus tract or swelling was detected and recorded as present or absent.
If one of these symptoms recorded as present, it is considered as failure.
If there is no symptom, it is considered as success.
|
24 months
|
|
The rate of radiographic healing of the periapical lesion.
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Follow-up visits were performed for all patients in order to evaluate radiographic status.
Changes in apical bone density indicating radiographic healing was assessed using Periapical Index (PAI) (Orstavik 1986) as the scoring system.
PAI 1 and 2 considered as healed, reduction in the PAI score was considered as healing and persistence or increased in the PAI score (PAI 4 or 5) was considered as failure.
|
24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The level of postoperative pain
Time Frame: 12hours-24hours and 48 hours
|
Postoperative pain after 12, 24 and 48 hours, was measured using a modified 4-grade visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 1 (no pain), 2 (mild pain), 3 (moderate pain/pain relieved by analgesics), to 4 (severe pain).
|
12hours-24hours and 48 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Fulya Karaoglan, Ege University Faculty of Dentistry
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Eyuboglu TF, Olcay K, Ozcan M. A clinical study on single-visit root canal retreatments on consecutive 173 patients: frequency of periapical complications and clinical success rate. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1761-1768. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1957-2. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
- He J, White RK, White CA, Schweitzer JL, Woodmansey KF. Clinical and Patient-centered Outcomes of Nonsurgical Root Canal Retreatment in First Molars Using Contemporary Techniques. J Endod. 2017 Feb;43(2):231-237. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.029.
- Zhang MM, Fang GF, Chen XT, Liang YH. Four-year Outcome of Nonsurgical Root Canal Retreatment Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Endod. 2021 Mar;47(3):382-390. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.10.020. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Root canal retreatment
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.