Shock Wave vs. On-demand Tadalafil for Erectile Dysfunction

January 6, 2022 updated by: Hosam Kotb, Menoufia University

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus On-demand Tadalafil for Erectile Dysfunction

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of focused Li-ESWT on 25 participants complaining of ED compared to 25 participants complaining of ED on medical treatment on a prospective clinical trial for 12 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Penile erection is a very complex process which requires a delicate and coordinated equilibrium among the neurological, vascular and the tissue compartments. It also includes arterial dilation, trabecular smooth muscle relaxation, and activation of the corporeal veno occlusive mechanism.Erectile dysfunction is defined as persistent inability to achieve or maintain the erection that is sufficient to permit satisfactory sexual intercours. It has a multifactorial pathogenesis, one of them is vasculogenic ED that occurs due to diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, or vascular occlusive disease.

ED is also the most commonly treated sexual disorder and it affects approximately 20% of adult males over the age of 20. Nowadays, there are several treatment solutions for patients with ED, either non-invasive or invasive but the phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors are still the first-line therapy for ED.

However, PDE5-Is effect is limited due to their inability to improve penile blood flow for a time period that is sufficient to allow optimal oxygenation and recovery of Cavernosal vasculature. Also, they cannot improve spontaneous erections. Moreover, several patients ranging from 40% to 50% will not respond to drug therapy even after optimization approaches such as treatment combinations have been implemented.

Also, it was proven that the effect of long-term daily use of PDE5-Is on endothelial function has induced a short-term improvement in erectile function but probably not a longstanding one.

Another option for ED patients is the use of intracavernosal injections which is considered the second line of treatment. Although PDE5-Is and intracavernosal injections are effective and safe vasodilating agents, they are unable to alter the underlying predominant pathology in patients with vasculogenic ED (eg, cavernosal artery insufficiency).

Other options include the use of intraurethral injections, or vacuum constrictive devices that could serve as salvage therapy for patients who failed to respond to PDE5-Is. If the previous options failed or not preferred by the patient, penile prosthesis implantation would be the last resort treatment for ED.

Many trials were done to find a new treatment modality that would provide a rehabilitative or curative effect for ED. This modality should affect the endothelial function and improve penile hemodynamics. One of these modalities was low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt, 32632
        • Recruiting
        • Menoufia University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients
  • ED at least for 6 months
  • vasculogenic ED
  • from 25-60 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • psychological patents
  • neurological patients
  • younger than 25 years old
  • older than 60 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Shockwave group
This group will receive 6 sessions (2 per week) with average 6,000 shocks per session with the PiezoWave2 unit
Device: LI-ESWT
Low intenisty shockwave therapy newly used for treatment of erectile dysfunction by applying 6 sessions on 3 weeks (2 sessions /week)
Other Names:
  • Shockwave therapy
Active Comparator: Medical Treatment Group
This group will receive self-administered Tadalafil on-demand
Drug: Tadalafil 20Mg Oral Tablet
Patients on this arm will allocate on on-demand tadalafil 20 mg for treatment of ED

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Erectile function assessed by International Index of Erectile Function-5
Time Frame: 3 months
We will asessess erectile function using International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) where scores ≤6, severe; 8-16, moderate; 17-21, mild; and 22-25, none.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Erection hardness score
Time Frame: 3 months
We will assess the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) was based on self-estimated rigidity, categorized using a scale of 1- 4: (1) the penis is larger but not hard, (2) the penis is hard but not hard enough for penetration, (3) the penis is hard enough for penetration but not completely hard, and (4) the penis is completely hard and fully rigid for coitus
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Menoufia University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: fouad zanaty, professor, Menoufia University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 6, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 5/2021UROL9

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erectile Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on LI-ESWT

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings