A Prospective Study to Assess the Utility of CA-4F in a Canadian Cardiology Setting

January 13, 2022 updated by: Ensho Health Intelligent Systems Inc.
This study will assess whether CA-4F can improve diagnosis of ATTR-CM in a community cardiology setting when used to screen electronic medical record data for patients suitable for follow-up investigations.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective multicentre observational study to assess whether CA-4F can improve diagnosis of ATTR-CM in a community cardiology setting when used to screen electronic medical record data for patients suitable for follow-up investigations.

The algorithm will be used to screen electronic health records of participating cardiologists for patients suitable for PYP scans to investigate potential ATTR-CM and determine its positive predictive value.

Input parameters to the algorithm will be extracted from the pseudonymized electronic health records of patients who visited participating cardiologists in the 12 months preceding their enrolment.

The records of patients with elevated pre-test likelihood of ATTR-CM will be queried for Canadian Heart Failure Society red flag symptoms to facilitate clinical review. Participating cardiologists will review the red flag symptoms and electronic health records of patients with elevated pre-test likelihoods and document whether further investigation with PYP is clinically justified with supporting rationale.

Patients for which further investigation is clinically justified will be referred for confirmatory testing and the results of additional investigations will be documented. The positive predictive values of "moderate", "high" and "very high" CA-4F Risk Scores will be calculated by determining the percentage of those patients for which further investigations were performed and resulted in diagnosis of ATTR-CM.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
8

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
        • Site 85237
    • Ontario
      • Oakville, Ontario, Canada
        • Site 26174
      • Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
        • Site 47844

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Licensed cardiologist in the Canadian provinces of Ontario, Saskatchewan or British Columbia
  • Outpatient cardiology practice with ≥1,200 unique patients annually
  • Have used an electronic medical record system for ≥36 months from enrollment
  • Currently subscribed to the Advanced Computing Platform by Ensho Health or using a cloud-hosted electronic medical record system compatible with the Apollo Electronic Data Capture System
  • Experience with the clinical management of ATTR-CM
  • Access to PYP scanning for follow-up investigations
  • Previous participation in clinical studies

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Predominantly hospital-based cardiology practice
  • Have used an electronic medical record system for <36 months from enrollment
  • Electronic medical record system incompatible with the Apollo Electronic Data Capture system
  • No prior experience with the clinical management of ATTR-CM
  • No access to PYP scanning for follow-on investigations
  • No prior participation in clinical studies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Algorithm
All participating cardiologists.
Device: CA-4F

The study intervention is the CA-4F algorithm developed by Ensho Health.

The algorithm is a process for converting input parameters to a CA-4F Risk Score intended to facilitate clinical prioritization of patients suitable for follow-up investigation for ATTR-CM.

The algorithm is applied using the CA-4F Likelihood Estimator which encodes it in software and records its outputs. The CA-4F Likelihood Estimator is controlled through a graphical user interface called the CA-4F Controller.

The CA-4F Likelihood Estimator and its Controller are Class I medical devices in Canada registered under the Medical Device Establishment License of Ensho Health (license 16208).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical utility of CA-4F
Time Frame: Six months
Positive predictive value of "moderate" or greater CA-4F Risk Score as confirmed by PYP scan
Six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optimal threshold for clinical use
Time Frame: Six months
Positive predictive values of "moderate," "high," "very high," and "high" or greater CA-4F Risk Scores as confirmed by PYP scan
Six months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impacts of CA-4F on age at first diagnosis
Time Frame: Six months
Difference in age at diagnosis of patients diagnosed through the study and patients of participating cardiologists previously diagnosed with ATTR-CM
Six months
Impacts of CA-4F on rate of diagnosis in priority subgroups
Time Frame: Six months
Difference in biological sex distribution and left ventricular wall thickness measurements of patients diagnosed through the study and patients of participating cardiologists previously diagnosed with ATTR-CM
Six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ensho Health Intelligent Systems Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Taha Bandukwala, MD, Chief Medical Officer

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 30, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 13, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SA001401001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy ("ATTR-CM")

Clinical Trials on CA-4F

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings