Effects of an Integrated Multimodal Lifestyle Intervention for Management of Violence in Schizophrenia
Effects of an Integrated Multimodal Lifestyle Intervention for Management of Violence Through Regulation of Serum Lipid Profile in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
- I-Shou University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia for more than 2 years
- Psychiatrically hospitalized
- Repetitive violence within one year
- Ambulatory
- Having basic literacy
- More than 20 years old
- Less than 65 years old
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinical psychiatric diagnosis other than schizophrenia
- Physical co-morbidity or life-threatening illnesses that may impact on lipid homeostasis
- dietary restrictions for physical condition
- pregnancy
- reported disabilities
- impairments or health illness/problems that significantly limited their ability to perform the intervention such as severe arthritis, uncorrected visual or hearing impairments, developmental disability, or signs of intellectual disability.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Group: an integrated multimodal lifestyle intervention (MLifeI)
The MLifeI program focused on the roles of health responsibility, review of lipid profile, complications of imbalanced lipid profile, lipid management and nutritional education.
|
The MLifeI program focused on the roles of health responsibility, review of lipid profile, complications of imbalanced lipid profile, lipid management and nutritional education.
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
The control group is the Treatment as Usual (TAU).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Weight in kilograms
Time Frame: Change of weight from baseline and 6 months (3-month follow-up)
|
Clinical Assessment: weight.
|
Change of weight from baseline and 6 months (3-month follow-up)
|
|
Height in meters
Time Frame: Change of weight from baseline and 6 months (3-month follow-up)
|
Clinical Assessment: height.
|
Change of weight from baseline and 6 months (3-month follow-up)
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Change of weight from baseline and 6 months (3-month follow-up)
|
Clinical Assessment: Body Mass Index; Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2.
The World Health Organisation defines an adult who has a BMI between 25 and 29.9 as overweight - an adult who has a BMI of 30 or higher is considered obese - a BMI below 18.5 is considered underweight, and between 18.5 to 24.9 a healthy weight.
|
Change of weight from baseline and 6 months (3-month follow-up)
|
|
Routine test in the ward of total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein (Change is being assessed, mg/dL)
Time Frame: Change of violence risk from baseline (T1) and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
Lipid profiles.
Assessment of serum metabolites.
|
Change of violence risk from baseline (T1) and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
|
Violence Risk Screening (Change is being assessed)
Time Frame: Change of violence risk from baseline (T1), 3 months (T2, end of treatment), and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
Questionnaires of violence.
A higher score indicates a higher violence risk.
|
Change of violence risk from baseline (T1), 3 months (T2, end of treatment), and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
|
Attribution Questionnaire (Change is being assessed)
Time Frame: Change of violence risk from baseline (T1), 3 months (T2, end of treatment), and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
Questionnaires of violence attributions.
The Attribution Questionnair was applied to measure the participant's internal/external attributions about the causality and likelihood of violence and responsibility for changing the behavior.
The measure was rated on a continuum scale from 1 (e.g., not at all likely; not at all able, etc.) to 7 (e.g., totally due to me; totally likely; totally able, etc.).
|
Change of violence risk from baseline (T1), 3 months (T2, end of treatment), and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
|
Modified Overt Aggression Scale (Change is being assessed)
Time Frame: Change of violence risk from baseline (T1), 3 months (T2, end of treatment), and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
Questionnaires of aggression frequency.
|
Change of violence risk from baseline (T1), 3 months (T2, end of treatment), and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
|
Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (Change is being assessed)
Time Frame: Change of violence risk from baseline (T1), 3 months (T2, end of treatment), and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
Questionnaires of violence/aggression.
The higher the score is, the higher the participant has the violent behavior.
|
Change of violence risk from baseline (T1), 3 months (T2, end of treatment), and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
|
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (Change is being assessed)
Time Frame: Change of violence risk from baseline (T1), 3 months (T2, end of treatment), and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
Questionnaires of impulsivity.
The score ranged from 1 (rarely/never) to 4 (almost always/always).
The higher the scores indicates the greater the impulsivity.
|
Change of violence risk from baseline (T1), 3 months (T2, end of treatment), and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
|
Mini-Mental State Examination (Change is being assessed)
Time Frame: Change of violence risk from baseline (T1), 3 months (T2, end of treatment), and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
Questionnaires of cognitive functioning.
The MMSE ranged from 0 to 30, where higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.
|
Change of violence risk from baseline (T1), 3 months (T2, end of treatment), and 6 months (T3, 3-month follow-up)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IShouU-cholesterol I
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.