Vision-based Assessment of Joint Extensibility in Ehlers Danlos Syndrome

November 27, 2023 updated by: Nimish Mittal, University Health Network, Toronto

Assessing the Feasibility of a Smartphone-based, Machine Learning Visual Imaging Application for Assessment of Hyperextensibility of Peripheral Joints in Ehlers Danlos Syndrome

Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (EDS) is a heterogenous group of genetic disorders with 13 identified subtypes. Hypermobile EDS (hEDS), although the most common subtype of EDS, does not yet have an identified genetic mutation for diagnostic confirmation. Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) is one of the hallmark features of hEDS. The scoring system used in measurement of GJH was described by Beighton. The Beighton score is calculated using a dichotomous scoring system to assess the extensibility of nine joints. Each joint is scored as either hypermobile (score = 1) or not hypermobile (score = 0). The total score (Beighton score) can vary between a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 9, with higher scores indicating greater joint laxity.

While there is moderate validity and inter-rater variability in using the Beighton score, there continue to be several challenges with its widespread and consistent application by clinicians. Some of the barriers reported in the literature include:

i) In open, non-standardized systems there can be significant variation in the method to perform these joint extensibility tests including assessing baseline measurements, ii) Determining consistent and standard measurement tools/methodology e.g. goniometer use can vary widely iii) Assessing the reliability of the cut off values and, iv) Performing full assessment prior to informing patients of possible classification of GJH positivity (low specificity and low positive predictive).

Inappropriate implementation of tests to assess GJH results in inaccurate identification of GJH and potentially unintended negative consequences of making the wrong diagnosis of EDS. The objective of this study is to create a more robust and valid method of joint mobility measurement and reduce error in the screening of EDS through use of a smartphone-based machine learning application systems for measurement of joint extensibility.

The project will:

i) Create a smart-phone enabled visual imaging app to assess the measurement of joint extensibility, ii) Assess the feasibility of using the smart-phone app in a clinical setting to screen potential EDS patients, iii) Determine the validity of the application in comparison to in person clinical assessment in a tertiary care academic EDS program. If successful, the smart-phone application could help standardize the care of potential EDS patients in an efficient and cost-effective manner.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
225

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
        • GoodHope EDS - Toronto General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The population being studied includes all patients referred to or seen in the GoodHope EDS clinic. The clinic accepts referrals from symptomatic adult patients (age > 18 years), with EDS, or suspected EDS. EDS is a connective tissue disorder with 100% penetrance, but variable in phenotypic expression, suspected cases of EDS or G-HSD may therefore include other hereditary or acquired connective tissue diseases/disorder, and/or complex chronic illnesses characterized by, or that feature, joint hypermobility, pain, and fatigue.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients seen in the GoodHope EDS clinic at Toronto General are eligible for inclusion, regardless of their presenting diagnosis or the results of their assessments

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not consent to participate will not be included (participants may withdraw consent at any time)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
New patients at the GoodHope EDS clinic at Toronto General Hospital
All patients seen in the EDS clinic are eligible for inclusion, regardless of their presenting diagnosis or the results of their assessments.
Other: No intervention, additional video data collection only
No intervention will be used. Consenting participants will have video recordings taken during their exam of joint hypermobility which will be analyzed at a later time

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of agreement in predicted angle by pose-estimation library
Time Frame: 4 months
The performance of the developed machine learning models for predicting the range of motion will be analyzed by the pose-estimation library used. This analysis will be performed on the subset of the data collected during the first 2 months of data collection. This information will be used to select the pose-estimation libraries to proceed with when refining the machine learning models.
4 months
Comparison of agreement in predicted angle by joint
Time Frame: 1 year
The performance of the developed machine learning models for predicting the range of motion at each joint (spine, knee, ankle, elbow, shoulder, thumb, fifth finger) will be analyzed independently for each joint. This will provide insight with respect to which joints the system is more accurate at predicting from video.
1 year
Assess the accuracy of range of motion prediction using vision-based data
Time Frame: 1 year
Machine learning models trained on videos of individuals performing the joint hypermobility maneuvers will be developed. Their performance will be compared to the range of motion measured by an expert clinician using a goniometer.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Health Network, Toronto

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nimish Mittal, MD, GoodHope Ehlers Danlos Syndrome Clinic, Toronto General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 26, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 27, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 22-5073

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No IPD will be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

Clinical Trials on No intervention, additional video data collection only

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings