Addition of MgSO4 or Dexamethasone to Bupivacaine on the Prolongation of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumboram Block

May 25, 2022 updated by: Ghada M.Samir, Ain Shams University

A Comparative Study Between the Effect of Addition of MgSO4 or Dexamethasone to Bupivacaine on the Prolongation of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumboram Block

The goal of postoperative pain management is the provision of comfort, early mobilization and improved respiratory function without causing inadequate sedation and respiratory compromise, which can be achieved through using regional anethesia.

This study aimed to assess the analgesic effect of adding dexamethasone or magnesium sulphate with bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided QLB to prolong its duration in patients undergoing open abdominal surgeries in the early postoperative period regarding pain relief After approval of the ethical committees in Ain Shams University Hospitals, patients undergoing open abdominal surgeries were included in the study, and were divided into three groups (n=22; each); group M, D and group C. In Group A, patients (n=22) received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% plus 5 ml of 10% MgSO. In group B, patients (n=22) received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% plus 8 mg dexamethasone (2 ml) plus 3 ml 0.9% NaCl. In group C (control), patients (n=22) received 20 ml bupivacaine plus 5 ml 0.9% NaCl.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Ain-Shams University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II
  • aged 18 to 65 years
  • body weight ≥ 60 kg and ≤ 90 kg
  • scheduled for open abdominal surgeries

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients' refusal to participate in the study
  • history of allergy to the medications used in the study
  • hepatic disease
  • renal disease
  • known neurologic disorders
  • psychiatric disorder
  • chronic treatment with calcium channel blockers
  • hyper-magnesemia
  • coagulopathy
  • anatomical abnormalities
  • hemodynamic instability
  • local infection
  • suspected intra- abdominal sepsis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Bupivacaine Magnesium sulphate group
Patients received QL block with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (2, 4)plus 5 ml of 10% MgSO4.
Drug: Bupivacaine- Magnesium
Patients received QL block with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (2, 4)plus 5 ml of 10% MgSO4.
Active Comparator: Bupivacaine Dexamethasone group
Patients received QL block with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (2,4)plus 2 ml of 8 mg dexamethasone plus 3 ml of 0.9% NS.
Drug: Bupivacaine dexamethasone
Patients received QL block with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (2,4)plus 2 ml of 8 mg dexamethasone plus 3 ml of 0.9% NS.
Active Comparator: bupivacaine saline group
Patients received QL block with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (2,4)plus 5 ml of 0.9% NS.
Drug: Bupivacaine saline
Patients received QL block with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (2,4)plus 5 ml of 0.9% NS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of post-operative analgesia
Time Frame: 24hours
Time from completion of the block to the first request of rescue analgesia.
24hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: 24 hours
Measured before induction of anesthesia (base line), upon arrival to the PACU, after 30 and 60 min. If hypotension (MBP < 20% of the base line value) occurred, 3 mg increments of ephedrine repeated every 5 min if required was given. MBP was then recorded at 2, 6, 12 and 24 post-operative hours.
24 hours
Heart rate
Time Frame: 24 hours
Recorded before induction of anesthesia (base line),upon arrival to the PACU, after 30 and 60 min. If bradycardia (HR <50 bpm) occurred, 0.5 mg atropine was given. HR was then recorded at 2, 6, 12 and 24 post-operative hours.
24 hours
The severity of post-operative pain at rest
Time Frame: 24 hours
By using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); from 0= no pain, to 10=worst imaginable pain. Assessed upon arrival to the PACU, after 30 and 60 min. The VAS was then recorded at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 post-operative hours.
24 hours
The severity of post-operative pain with movement (bilateral knee flexion)
Time Frame: 24 hours
By using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); from 0= no pain, to 10=worst imaginable pain. Assessed at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 post-operative hours
24 hours
Number of patients requiring post-operative rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours
Number of patients requiring pethidine in the 24 hours post-operative period
24 hours
Total dose of pethidine given
Time Frame: 24 hours
The cumulative total pethidine doses given to each patient in the 24 hours post-operative period.
24 hours
Occurrence of nausea and/or vomiting:
Time Frame: 24 hours
Number of patients who develop nausea and/or vomitting
24 hours
Time to first ambulation
Time Frame: 24 hours
The time to the start of movement by each patient in the 24 hours post-operative period
24 hours
The analgesic satisfaction at 24 post-operative hours
Time Frame: 24 hours
Patients were asked to report their satisfaction with the pain management; assessed as, 1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, and 4 = excellent.
24 hours
Inadvertent femoral nerve block
Time Frame: 24 hours
number of patients who develop lower limb weakness
24 hours
Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST):
Time Frame: 24 hours
As any regional anesthesia technique with local anesthetic is associated with potential systemic absorption of local anesthetics.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ain Shams University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 31, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FMASU MS 256/2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Operative Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine- Magnesium

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings