The Effect of the Flipped Classroom Model on Teaching Clinical Practice Skills
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Talas
-
Kayseri, Talas, Turkey, 38280
- Kayseri Üniversitesi
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Over 18 years old
Exclusion Criteria:
- who refused to participate in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: experimental group
The flipped classroom model was used in teaching the clinical practice skills of the students in the experimental group.
First of all, videos for clinical applications were prepared by the researchers.
These prepared videos were shared with the students in the experimental group one week before the lesson day of each application for preliminary study and the students were asked to work on these videos.
On the day of the lesson, group work, question-answer and discussion activities were held with the students in the classroom environment.
At the end of the lesson, the students were asked to do the applications on the simulation models of the application and the checklists were filled.
|
Videos for clinical applications have been prepared by researchers.
These prepared videos were shared with the students in the experimental group one week before the lesson day of each application for preliminary study and the students were asked to work on these videos.
On the day of the lesson, group work, question-answer and discussion activities were held with the students in the classroom environment.
At the end of the lesson, the students were asked to do the applications on the simulation models of the application and the checklists were filled.
|
|
Active Comparator: control group
To the students in the control group, the application was explained by the researcher (instructor conducting the course) using presentation and demonstration methods.
Each application was made on different days.
The prepared checklists were filled by the other researcher.
While the students were doing the applications, one of the researchers observed the application and marked only the skill level in the checklists ("applied", "incompletely applied" and "did not apply") without making any comments or directions.
|
To the students in the control group, the application was explained by the researcher (instructor conducting the course) using presentation and demonstration methods.
Each application was made on different days.
The prepared checklists were filled by the other researcher.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Control List
Time Frame: immediately after application
|
The checklists were created by the researchers using the clinical practice guidelines on nursing principles (Dikmen & Akın Korhan, 2016; Taşçı, et al., 2018) and the opinions of three experts in the field of nursing principles were obtained.
In the study, intravenous catheterization (28 application steps), intravenous blood collection (24 application steps), blood pressure measurement from the brachial artery (24 application steps), intramuscular injection into the ventrogluteal region (34 application steps) and female urinary catheterization (39 application steps) applications were examined.
5 checklists containing skill steps were used.
In the checklists, each application step was arranged as a three-point Likert scale as "applied" (2 points), "applied incompletely" (1 point), and "did not apply" (0 points).
The lowest score in the checklists is 0, and the highest score differs according to the number of skill steps in clinical applications.
|
immediately after application
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ali KAPLAN, Dr., Kayseri University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- TC Kayseri University
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.