Investigating Speech Sequencing in Neurotypical Speakers and Persons With Disordered Speech

July 23, 2026 updated by: Boston University Charles River Campus

Sequencing and Initiation in Speech Production: Investigating Speech Sequencing in Neurotypical Speakers, Persons Who Stutter, and Persons With Primary Progressive Aphasia

Persistent developmental stuttering affects more than three million people in the United States, and it can have profound adverse effects on quality of life. Despite its prevalence and negative impact, stuttering has resisted explanation and effective treatment, due in large part to a poor understanding of the neural processing impairments underlying the disorder. The overall goal of this study is to improve understanding of the brain mechanisms involved in speech motor planning and how these are disrupted in neurogenic speech disorders, like stuttering. The investigators will do this through an integrated combination of experiments that involve speech production, functional MRI, and non-invasive brain stimulation. The study is designed to test hypotheses regarding the brain processes involved in learning and initiating new speech sound sequences and how those processes compare in persons with persistent developmental stuttering and those with typical speech development. These processes will be studied in both adults and children. Additionally, these processes will be investigated in patients with neurodegenerative speech disorders (primary progressive aphasia) to further inform the investigators understanding of the neural mechanisms that support speech motor sequence learning. Together these experiments will result in an improved account of the brain mechanisms underlying speech production in fluent speakers and individuals who stutter, thereby paving the way for the development of new therapies and technologies for addressing this disorder.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
278

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Frank H Guenther, PhD
  • Phone Number: 6173535765
  • Email: guenther@bu.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Barbara Holland
  • Phone Number: 6173536181
  • Email: splab@bu.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Boston University
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Healthy individuals with no history of neurological, speech, or hearing disorders (other than stuttering in studies that involve adults who stutter).
  • To maximize the uniformity of prior exposure to the speech stimuli that will be used, only native speakers of American English will be recruited, and only those with limited exposure to a second language will be enrolled.
  • All adult participants will also pass a standard pure-tone hearing screening at a 25dB hearing level threshold at 500, 1k, 2k, and 4kHz frequencies.
  • All participating children will pass a hearing screening at a 20 dB threshold at 500, 1k, 2k, and 4k Hz.
  • Participants in experiments that require them to read orthographic stimuli must have normal or corrected-to-normal vision (MRI-safe corrective glasses are available at the Boston University Cognitive Neuroimaging Center for use during neuroimaging).
  • Participating children will complete additional speech, language, hearing, and cognitive tests to ensure that they are within normal performance ranges for their age with the exception of stuttering for children in the children who stutter (CWS) group.
  • Persons who stutter will be evaluated formally by a speech-language pathologist to assess stuttering severity and to ensure the absence of other speech or language disorders. PWS will have no history of neurological disorder other than stuttering, and will demonstrate very mild to severe stuttering according to the Stuttering Severity Instrument for Children and Adults - 4th Edition (SSI-4: PRO-ED, Inc.), that is confirmed by clinical reports and expressed concern by the subject and/or guardian.
  • Participants with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) will have been diagnosed through the Massachusetts General Hospital Frontotemporal Disorders Unit (MGH-FTD) by an experienced neurologist in coordination with a speech-language pathologist.
  • Participants with PPA will have a score of 1.0 or lower on the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (i.e., mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia) to ensure cognitive levels are sufficient to complete the task.
  • All participants with PPA must have a recent clinical assessment and T1 structural neuroimaging scan through the MGH-FTD Unit for eligibility for this study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Participants in studies that involve tDCS or MRI scanning will have no contraindications specific to those procedures. For the tDCS study, this includes individuals who have a metallic implant in the head or electrically sensitive devices implanted in the body, a history of seizures, significant scalp lesions, or pregnancy.
  • For MRI studies, this includes a history of seizures, severe claustrophobia, the presence of magnetically or mechanically active implant, ferromagnetic material embedded in any part of the body, or pregnancy).
  • All participants will perform a standardized nonword repetition pre-test (the Dollaghan and Campbell Nonword Repetition Task) to assess working memory performance. Participants who perform more than 2 standard deviations below the norm for their age range will be deemed to be unable to perform the experimental task and released from further participation.
  • Participating children will have no history of neurological disorder other than stuttering, and will demonstrate very mild to severe stuttering according to the Stuttering Severity Instrument for Children and Adults, 4th Edition, that is confirmed by clinical reports and expressed concern by the subject and/or guardian.
  • Children under the age of 6 and over the age of 8 will not enrolled in this study.
  • Participants with PPA will not be eligible for this study if they are taking any medications that would be expected to affect speech or language.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Sub-syllabic learning and fMRI
60 adults with neurotypical speech development will participate in this arm. Subjects will learn novel 1-syllable nonsense words formed by non-native phoneme combinations during 6 training sessions over 2 days. Following training, subjects will participate in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) session on a third day to measure brain activity associated with producing the words learned during training and with a set of unfamiliar words also formed by non-native phoneme combinations.
Behavioral: Learning of non-native phoneme combinations: 6 training sessions
Each trial of the training sessions will follow a simple reaction time protocol in which a nonsense syllable containing novel consonant clusters (e.g., GDADK) is produced as quickly and accurately as possible after an auditory prompt presented via earphones. During each training session, the participant will practice producing a set of 8 stimuli (the Fully Learned stimuli). Each of the 8 Fully Learned stimuli will be produced 60 times over the 6 training sessions.
Experimental: Sub-syllabic learning and anodal tDCS of inferior frontal sulcus
35 adults with neurotypical speech development will participate in this arm. Subjects will learn novel 1-syllable nonsense words formed by non-native phoneme combinations. During the training, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) will be applied to the the subject's left inferior frontal sulcus.
Behavioral: Learning of non-native phoneme combinations: 1 training session
Each trial of the training sessions will follow a simple reaction time protocol in which a nonsense syllable containing novel consonant clusters (e.g., GDADK) is produced as quickly and accurately as possible after an auditory prompt presented via earphones. During the training session, the participant will practice producing a set of 3 stimuli (the Fully Learned stimuli). Each of the 3 Fully Learned stimuli will be produced 60 times.
Other: Anodal tDCS
Continuous anodal tDCS is delivered to a speech processing area of the brain during a 19-minute speech training session. The tDCS stimulation will ramp up to its maximum value (2 milliamperes) in the minute prior to the training session and maintained at that level throughout the session.
Experimental: Sub-syllabic learning and anodal tDCS of cerebellum
35 adults with neurotypical speech development will participate in this arm. Subjects will learn novel 1-syllable words formed by non-native phoneme combinations. During the training, continuous anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) will be applied to the the subject's right cerebellum.
Behavioral: Learning of non-native phoneme combinations: 1 training session
Each trial of the training sessions will follow a simple reaction time protocol in which a nonsense syllable containing novel consonant clusters (e.g., GDADK) is produced as quickly and accurately as possible after an auditory prompt presented via earphones. During the training session, the participant will practice producing a set of 3 stimuli (the Fully Learned stimuli). Each of the 3 Fully Learned stimuli will be produced 60 times.
Other: Anodal tDCS
Continuous anodal tDCS is delivered to a speech processing area of the brain during a 19-minute speech training session. The tDCS stimulation will ramp up to its maximum value (2 milliamperes) in the minute prior to the training session and maintained at that level throughout the session.
Sham Comparator: Sub-syllabic learning and sham tDCS
35 adults with neurotypical speech development will participate in this arm. Subjects will learn novel 1-syllable words formed by non-native phoneme combinations. During training, Sham transcranial direct current stimulation stimulation (tDCS) will be delivered to the subject's brain.
Behavioral: Learning of non-native phoneme combinations: 1 training session
Each trial of the training sessions will follow a simple reaction time protocol in which a nonsense syllable containing novel consonant clusters (e.g., GDADK) is produced as quickly and accurately as possible after an auditory prompt presented via earphones. During the training session, the participant will practice producing a set of 3 stimuli (the Fully Learned stimuli). Each of the 3 Fully Learned stimuli will be produced 60 times.
Other: Sham tDCS
Sham tDCS stimulation is delivered to a speech processing area of the brain during a 19-minute speech training session. During the minute prior to training onset, the tDCS stimulator is ramped up to 2 milliamperes and then back down to 0.
Experimental: Multisyllabic learning and fMRI in adults
30 adults persistent developmental stuttering (AWS) and 30 adults with neurotypical speech development (ANS) will participate in this arm. Subjects will learn nonsense words formed by novel combinations of 3 syllables that are legal in American English during 6 training sessions over 2 days. Following training, subjects will participate in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) session on a third day to measure brain activity associated with producing the words formed by pairing 2 learned 3-syllable strings learned during training and those formed by pairing 2 unfamiliar 3-syllable strings. Behavioral measures extracted from the data will be used to compare performance before and after training and across the AWS and ANS participants.
Behavioral: Learning of novel multisyllabic nonwords
Each trial of the training sessions (total of 6 training sessions over 2 days) will follow a simple reaction time protocol in which a nonword stimulus formed by 2 or 3 syllables that are legal in American English is presented auditorily to the participant, who then produces the stimulus as quickly and accurately as possible. During training, each participant will repeatedly produce 6 nonwords, with each nonword produced a total of 60 times over the 6 training sessions.
Experimental: Multisyllabic learning in children
45 children with persistent developmental stuttering (CWS) and 45 children with neurotypical speech development (CNS) will participate in this arm. Subjects will learn nonsense words formed by novel combinations of 2 syllables that are legal in American English during 6 training sessions over 2 days. Behavioral measures extracted from the data will be used to compare performance before and after training and across the CWS and CNS participants.
Behavioral: Learning of novel multisyllabic nonwords
Each trial of the training sessions (total of 6 training sessions over 2 days) will follow a simple reaction time protocol in which a nonword stimulus formed by 2 or 3 syllables that are legal in American English is presented auditorily to the participant, who then produces the stimulus as quickly and accurately as possible. During training, each participant will repeatedly produce 6 nonwords, with each nonword produced a total of 60 times over the 6 training sessions.
Experimental: Sub-syllabic learning in PPA
30 adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) will participate in this arm. Subjects will learn novel 1-syllable nonsense words formed by non-native phoneme combinations during 8 training sessions over 2 days. Following training, subjects will complete a behavioral test to compare their performance on the words learned during training with a set of unfamiliar words also formed by non-native phoneme combinations.
Behavioral: Learning of non-native phoneme combinations: 8 training sessions
Each trial of the training sessions will follow a simple reaction time protocol in which a nonsense syllable containing novel consonant clusters (e.g., GDADK) is produced as quickly and accurately as possible after an auditory prompt presented via earphones. During each training session, the participant will practice producing a set of 3 stimuli (the Fully Learned stimuli). Each of the 3 Fully Learned stimuli will be produced 120 times over the 8 training sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in production error rate
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline and immediately following intervention
Investigators will compare mean error rates when producing newly learned speech sequences versus novel speech sequences of the same length in each arm. This measure will be used to test hypotheses regarding speech motor learning and brain activity and how these compare in persons with persistent developmental stuttering and persons with neurotypical speech.
Evaluated at Baseline and immediately following intervention
Change from baseline in utterance duration
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline and immediately following intervention
Investigators will measure changes in utterance duration before and after speech sequence training to test hypotheses concerning differences in the neural mechanisms responsible for speed/duration improvements compared to improvements in accuracy (i.e., reductions in error rate).
Evaluated at Baseline and immediately following intervention
Change from baseline in reaction time
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline and immediately following intervention
Investigators will measure the time interval between the prompt to begin speech and the subject's speech onset. Mean reaction time will be compared for learned and novel nonwords in persons with persistent developmental stuttering and persons with neurotypical speech.
Evaluated at Baseline and immediately following intervention
Percentage of words stuttered
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline and immediately following intervention
Investigators will compare the percentage of words stuttered under different experimental conditions. This measure will be used to test hypotheses regarding the effect of speech motor learning on stuttering rate and the relationship between stuttering rate and brain activity.
Evaluated at Baseline and immediately following intervention
Brain activity measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline and immediately following intervention
Investigators will measure blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) brain activity when producing speech utterances in different experimental conditions in adults with persistent developmental stuttering and those with neurotypical speech.
Evaluated at Baseline and immediately following intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cortical white matter connectivity
Time Frame: Evaluated during the MRI scanning procedure
Diffusion-weighted MRI will be collected and used to identify relationships between white matter connectivity and behavioral measures.
Evaluated during the MRI scanning procedure
Cortical morphometry
Time Frame: Evaluated during the MRI scanning procedure
Structural MRI will be collected and used to identify relationships between cortical morphometry and behavioral measures.
Evaluated during the MRI scanning procedure
Working memory test scores
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline
The Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP) Second Edition working memory subtest scores for each participant will be used to identify correlations between working memory capacity, task performance, and brain measures in all studies.
Evaluated at Baseline
Forward digit span
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline
Scores from the Forward Digit Span task from the Uniform Data Set neuropsychological test battery will be used for each participant with PPA to identify correlations between phonological working memory and task performance.
Evaluated at Baseline
Stuttering Severity
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline
The Stuttering Severity Instrument, 4th Edition, will be administered to persons show stutter to identify correlations between stuttering severity and task performance and functional and structural brain measures.
Evaluated at Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston University Charles River Campus

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Massachusetts General Hospital
University of Michigan
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Frank H Guenther, PhD, Boston University
  • Principal Investigator: Soo-Eun Chang, PhD, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R01DC007683 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 2R01DC007683-16A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 1F31DC020352-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings