A Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of CT-P47 and RoActemra in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

September 12, 2024 updated by: Celltrion

A Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Two Intravenous Infusion Formulations of Tocilizumab (CT-P47 and RoActemra) When Co-administered With Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

This is a phase 3 study to compare efficacy and safety of CT-P47 and RoActemra in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

CT-P47, containing the active ingredient tocilizumab, is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that is being developed as a similar biological medicinal product to RoActemra/Actemra. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety of CT-P47 and RoActemra in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis when co-administered with methotrexate.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
471

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Poland
      • Bialystok, Poland
        • INTER CLINIC Piotr Adrian Klimiuk

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is male or female aged 18 to 75 years old, both inclusive.
  2. Patient has had a diagnosis of RA according to the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for at least 24 weeks prior to the first administration of the study drug.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient who has previously received investigational or licensed product; targeted synthetic DMARD(s) (e.g., tofacitinib, baricitinib) for the treatment of RA and/or an interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitor for any purposes.
  2. Patient who has previously received more than 1 biologic agents approved for the treatment of RA.
  3. Patient who has allergies to any of the excipients of study drug or any other murine and human proteins, or patient with a hypersensitivity to immunoglobulin products.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CT-P47
CT-P47(Tocilizumab)
Biological: CT-P47
CT-P47, 8 mg/kg (not exceeding 800 mg/dose) by intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W)
Active Comparator: EU-approved RoActemra
EU-approved RoActemra(Tocilizumab)
Biological: CT-P47
CT-P47, 8 mg/kg (not exceeding 800 mg/dose) by intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W)
Biological: EU-approved RoActemra
EU-approved RoActemra, 8 mg/kg (not exceeding 800 mg/dose) by IV infusion Q4W

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24

The DAS28(ESR) score was derived using the following formulae:

DAS28 (ESR)=(0.56 ×√TJC28)+(0.28 × √SJC28)+(0.70 × ln[ESR])+(0.014 ×GH)

Where:

  • TJC28 = number of tender joints (0-28): tender joint count (TJC)
  • SJC28 = number of swollen joints (0-28): swollen joint count (SJC)
  • ESR = ESR measurement (mm/hour)
  • GH = patient's global disease activity measured on VAS (mm: 0-100)

DAS28 (ESR) values could be ranged from 0 to 10 while higher values mean a higher disease activity.
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in DAS28 (ESR) at Week 32
Time Frame: Week 32

The DAS28(ESR) score was derived using the following formulae:

DAS28 (ESR)=(0.56 ×√TJC28)+(0.28 × √SJC28)+(0.70 × ln[ESR])+(0.014 ×GH)

Where:

  • TJC28 = number of tender joints (0-28): tender joint count (TJC)
  • SJC28 = number of swollen joints (0-28): swollen joint count (SJC)
  • ESR = ESR measurement (mm/hour)
  • GH = patient's global disease activity measured on VAS (mm: 0-100)

DAS28 (ESR) values could be ranged from 0 to 10 while higher values mean a higher disease activity.
Week 32
ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Response Rate at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
ACR20 is defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in the three of the following five criteria: 1) patient global assessment of disease activity, 2) physician global assessment of disease activity, 3) functional ability measure using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), 4) visual analog pain scale, and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP). ACR50 and ACR70 are the same instruments with improvement levels defined as 50% and 70% respectively versus 20% for ACR20.
Week 24
ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Response Rate at Week 32
Time Frame: Week 32
ACR20 is defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in the three of the following five criteria: 1) patient global assessment of disease activity, 2) physician global assessment of disease activity, 3) functional ability measure using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), 4) visual analog pain scale, and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP). ACR50 and ACR70 are the same instruments with improvement levels defined as 50% and 70% respectively versus 20% for ACR20.
Week 32

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Celltrion

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Klimiuk Piotr, INTER CLINIC Piotr Adrian Klimiuk

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 29, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 23, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 12, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CT-P47 3.1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings