A Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of CT-P47 and RoActemra in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

September 12, 2024 updated by: Celltrion

A Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Two Intravenous Infusion Formulations of Tocilizumab (CT-P47 and RoActemra) When Co-administered With Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

This is a phase 3 study to compare efficacy and safety of CT-P47 and RoActemra in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

CT-P47, containing the active ingredient tocilizumab, is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that is being developed as a similar biological medicinal product to RoActemra/Actemra. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety of CT-P47 and RoActemra in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis when co-administered with methotrexate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

471

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bialystok, Poland
        • INTER CLINIC Piotr Adrian Klimiuk

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is male or female aged 18 to 75 years old, both inclusive.
  2. Patient has had a diagnosis of RA according to the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for at least 24 weeks prior to the first administration of the study drug.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient who has previously received investigational or licensed product; targeted synthetic DMARD(s) (e.g., tofacitinib, baricitinib) for the treatment of RA and/or an interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitor for any purposes.
  2. Patient who has previously received more than 1 biologic agents approved for the treatment of RA.
  3. Patient who has allergies to any of the excipients of study drug or any other murine and human proteins, or patient with a hypersensitivity to immunoglobulin products.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CT-P47
CT-P47(Tocilizumab)
CT-P47, 8 mg/kg (not exceeding 800 mg/dose) by intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W)
Active Comparator: EU-approved RoActemra
EU-approved RoActemra(Tocilizumab)
CT-P47, 8 mg/kg (not exceeding 800 mg/dose) by intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W)
EU-approved RoActemra, 8 mg/kg (not exceeding 800 mg/dose) by IV infusion Q4W

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24

The DAS28(ESR) score was derived using the following formulae:

DAS28 (ESR)=(0.56 ×√TJC28)+(0.28 × √SJC28)+(0.70 × ln[ESR])+(0.014 ×GH)

Where:

  • TJC28 = number of tender joints (0-28): tender joint count (TJC)
  • SJC28 = number of swollen joints (0-28): swollen joint count (SJC)
  • ESR = ESR measurement (mm/hour)
  • GH = patient's global disease activity measured on VAS (mm: 0-100)

DAS28 (ESR) values could be ranged from 0 to 10 while higher values mean a higher disease activity.

Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in DAS28 (ESR) at Week 32
Time Frame: Week 32

The DAS28(ESR) score was derived using the following formulae:

DAS28 (ESR)=(0.56 ×√TJC28)+(0.28 × √SJC28)+(0.70 × ln[ESR])+(0.014 ×GH)

Where:

  • TJC28 = number of tender joints (0-28): tender joint count (TJC)
  • SJC28 = number of swollen joints (0-28): swollen joint count (SJC)
  • ESR = ESR measurement (mm/hour)
  • GH = patient's global disease activity measured on VAS (mm: 0-100)

DAS28 (ESR) values could be ranged from 0 to 10 while higher values mean a higher disease activity.

Week 32
ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Response Rate at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
ACR20 is defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in the three of the following five criteria: 1) patient global assessment of disease activity, 2) physician global assessment of disease activity, 3) functional ability measure using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), 4) visual analog pain scale, and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP). ACR50 and ACR70 are the same instruments with improvement levels defined as 50% and 70% respectively versus 20% for ACR20.
Week 24
ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Response Rate at Week 32
Time Frame: Week 32
ACR20 is defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in the three of the following five criteria: 1) patient global assessment of disease activity, 2) physician global assessment of disease activity, 3) functional ability measure using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), 4) visual analog pain scale, and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP). ACR50 and ACR70 are the same instruments with improvement levels defined as 50% and 70% respectively versus 20% for ACR20.
Week 32

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Klimiuk Piotr, INTER CLINIC Piotr Adrian Klimiuk

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 23, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on CT-P47

Subscribe