Active Moms Project: Physical Activity Intervention for Low-Income Mothers
Active Moms: A Feasibility Study of a Community-Based and Home-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Low-Income, Ethnic-Minority Mothers
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- a mother of a young child (<10 years of age)
- fluent in either Spanish or English
- Sedentary (i.e., not engaging in 90 minutes or more of moderate or vigorous physical activity per week)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not medically cleared by a doctor or by a medical history screener to engage in moderate-intensity physical activity
- Currently pregnant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Community-based intervention
This program consisted of 12 group exercise sessions over a three-month period that were offered in Spanish and English.
Each two-hour session consisted of 90 minutes of flexibility, cardiovascular, and strength exercises to meet physical activity recommendations and 30 minutes of group discussions that focused on topics related to the adoption and maintenance of physical activity.
|
Mothers were given physical activity goals and coping resources to practice at home and were asked to record their experiences on an activity log.
Course content was taught from a detailed training manual and was based on concepts and strategies from social cognitive theory that have been effective in increasing physical activity and fitness levels among mothers.
In the first month, mothers attended group exercise sessions twice per week (total of eight group sessions) and exercised on their own once per week.
In the second month, mothers attended group exercise sessions once per week (total of four group sessions) and exercised on their own twice per week.
In the third month, mothers exercised on their own three times per week.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Home-based intervention
Mothers randomized to the HBI group participated in a three-month program where they were given print-based materials (offered in Spanish or English) at each monthly assessment time point.
The print-based materials provided information on multiple cardiovascular, strength training, and flexibility exercises that they could do at home.
|
The HBI group received information on building social support and reducing physical activity barriers based on materials from the Diabetes Prevention Program.
Participants were also given activity logs to record their physical activity each week, which was collected by research staff at each monthly assessment time point to assess how participants were progressing with their physical activity goals.
Mothers exercised on their own for three months with the goal of meeting national physical activity guidelines
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Physical Activity from baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Self-reported and fitbit physical activity assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
Self-reported duration of moderate/vigorous physical activity was assessed using the Check and Line Questionnaire (CALQ), with higher numbers representing greater average minutes of moderate/vigorous-intensity PA completed/day over a three-day assessment period.
Objective physical activity was assessed using the Fitbit One (2009 version), which is an accelerometer worn on the hip (clipped to a participant's clothing at the waist).
For the current study, very active minutes were examined (measure of basal metabolic rate/minute).
Activity data was averaged across the three days that the Fitbit was worn, with greater number of very active minutes indicating greater daily moderate/vigorous-intensity physical activity levels.
|
Self-reported and fitbit physical activity assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
|
Change in Cardiorespiratory Fitness from baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Cardiorespiratory fitness assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed via predicted relative maximum oxygen consumption, also known as relative VO2 max (ml/kg/min) after participants completed a timed mile walk, with a greater relative VO2 max being an indicator of greater cardiorespiratory fitness.
|
Cardiorespiratory fitness assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
|
Change in Muscle Endurance from baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Muscle endurance assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
Muscle endurance was assessed by the number of modified push-ups completed in correct form, with a greater number of 90° push-ups completed representing greater muscular endurance.
|
Muscle endurance assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
|
Change in Flexibility from baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Flexibility assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
Flexibility was assessed by a modified sit and reach test (in inches) where mothers were instructed to reach forward as far as they could with their hands over each other, over a three-foot ruler, without removing their body from the wall and holding this position for at least two seconds, with greater inches indicating greater flexibility.
|
Flexibility assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Physical Activity Self-Efficacy from baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Physical Activity Self-efficacy assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
Physical Activity Self-efficacy was assessed using the Barriers Self-Efficacy Scale.
The 14-item Barriers Self-Efficacy Scale measures a mother's level of confidence in engaging in physical activity despite barriers experienced over the next three months, with higher scores (range=0-100) reflecting higher self-efficacy for physical activity in the face of barriers.
|
Physical Activity Self-efficacy assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
|
Change in Fitness Self-Efficacy from baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Fitness Self-efficacy assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
Fitness Self-efficacy was assessed using the Self-Efficacy for Physical Performance Scale.
The 5-item Self-Efficacy for Physical Performance Scale measures a participant's self-efficacy to currently perform multiple activities that improve fitness (e.g., walking a mile, doing push-ups), with higher scores (range=0-100) indicating higher self-efficacy for fitness.
|
Fitness Self-efficacy assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
|
Change in Social Support from baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Social support assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
Social support for physical activity was assessed using the 15-item Social Support for Exercise Survey.
The Social Support for Exercise Survey measures the degree of social support received from one's family and friends to engage in physical activity, with higher scores (range=0-75) reflecting more social support received from each of these support networks.
|
Social support assessments were conducted at baseline and at one, two, and three months post-intervention.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Guido Urizar, PhD, California State University, Long Beach
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PHS 11-252
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Due to the sensitive nature of the questions asked in this study, survey respondents were assured raw data would remain confidential and would not be shared.
Data not available / The data that has been used is confidential
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.