Web-based Symptom Monitoring and Survival in Advanced Stage Lung Cancer (LUCA-S)
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate if weekly symptom monitoring of patients with advanced lung cancer is associated with better survival and improved quality of life compared to standard follow-up.
Each week, participants in the intervention group will be asked to respond to an electronic weekly questionnaire covering 11 items related to current health status.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, two-armed, open-label trial in which participants will be randomised to standard follow-up according to current management guidelines for lung cancer (control arm) or with the addition of weekly web-based symptom monitoring (intervention arm). Both study groups will be asked to fill out quality of life questionnaires before randomisation and every three months. In addition to comparing survival and quality of life, the study will also assess progression free survival, performance status, eligibility for second line anti-neoplastic treatment and health care consumption.
All subjects will be followed for 24 months. Updated data on survival will also be collected up to 5-years.
By innovative use of an IT platform already in use in Swedish cancer care, this trial will evaluate potential benefits of systematic symptom monitoring in patients with advanced lung cancer. If corroborating earlier reports of marked survival benefits, the results of this trial could change clinical practice and current guidelines for follow-up of lung cancer patients.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Mats P Lambe, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +46707715655
- Email: mats.lambe@ki.se
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sandra Irenaeus, MD,PhD
- Phone Number: +46727180099
- Email: sandra.irenaeus@rccmellan.se
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically or cytology proven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- NSCLC stage III or IV
- ≥ 18 years
- ECOG performance status 0- 2
- Eligible patients should have initiated first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic disease with chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy, radiochemotherapy or targeted treatment
- Patients are eligible for inclusion if they have responded to first-line treatment with stable disease, or better, at the first radiological evaluation performed up to six months after start of treatment
- Stable disease, or better, on radiological assessment within 28 days of enrolment (CT scan or FDG-PET/CT. Cerebral MRI if known brain metastasis)
- Initial web-based application score of ≤ 6
- Basic computer literacy
- Bank-ID (electronic identification system) and access to "1177 Vårdguiden"
- The subject has given written consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Symptomatic brain metastases
- Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planned pregnancy
- Persons under guardianship or deprived of liberty
- Mental inability, reluctance or language difficulties that result in difficulty understanding the meaning of study participation
- Treatment or disease which, according to the investigator, can affect treatment or study results
- Ongoing participation in another interventional clinical study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Weekly symptom monitoring
Web-based weekly symptom monitoring in addition to standard follow-up
|
Patients randomized to the intervention arm will be invited to respond to a web-based weekly 11-item signs- and symptoms questionnaire
|
|
No Intervention: Standard care
Standard follow-up according to guidelines
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 60 months.
|
Overall survival
|
From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 60 months.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Progression free survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first confirmed disease progression as judged by the investigator, assessed up to 24 months.
|
First confirmed disease progression
|
From date of randomization until the date of first confirmed disease progression as judged by the investigator, assessed up to 24 months.
|
|
Performance status
Time Frame: At baseline and at each clinical visit (approximately every 3-4 months), assessed up to 24 months.
|
Performance status will be evaluated according to the ECOG Perfomance Status Scale (Scale 0-5: 0 = fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 5=dead).
|
At baseline and at each clinical visit (approximately every 3-4 months), assessed up to 24 months.
|
|
Proportion of patients starting second-line anti-neoplastic treatment
Time Frame: Assessed up to 24 months.
|
Proportion of patients starting second-line anti-neoplastic treatment within 12 weeks from date of confirmed disease progression after randomization.
|
Assessed up to 24 months.
|
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: At baseline and every three months, assessed up to 24 months.
|
Assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30-LC13 questionnaire.
The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures.
All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100.
A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
|
At baseline and every three months, assessed up to 24 months.
|
|
Symptoms of depression
Time Frame: At baseline and every three months, assessed up to 24 months.
|
Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9).
Score 0 (no symptoms) to 27 (severe symptoms).
|
At baseline and every three months, assessed up to 24 months.
|
|
Number of days of in-hospital care
Time Frame: Assessed up to 24 months.
|
Health care consumption will be assessed as number of days of in-hospital care during study participation.
|
Assessed up to 24 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gunnar L Wagenius, MD,PhD, Karolinska University Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Denis F, Basch E, Septans AL, Bennouna J, Urban T, Dueck AC, Letellier C. Two-Year Survival Comparing Web-Based Symptom Monitoring vs Routine Surveillance Following Treatment for Lung Cancer. JAMA. 2019 Jan 22;321(3):306-307. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18085.
- Temel JS, Greer JA, El-Jawahri A, Pirl WF, Park ER, Jackson VA, Back AL, Kamdar M, Jacobsen J, Chittenden EH, Rinaldi SP, Gallagher ER, Eusebio JR, Li Z, Muzikansky A, Ryan DP. Effects of Early Integrated Palliative Care in Patients With Lung and GI Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar 10;35(8):834-841. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.5046. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
- Nilsson J, Berglund A, Bergstrom S, Bergqvist M, Lambe M. The role of comorbidity in the management and prognosis in nonsmall cell lung cancer: a population-based study. Acta Oncol. 2017 Jul;56(7):949-956. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1324213. Epub 2017 May 9.
- Nipp R, Temel J. The Patient Knows Best: Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Routine Clinical Care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Sep 1;109(9). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx044. No abstract available.
- Basch E, Snyder C. Overcoming barriers to integrating patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice and electronic health records. Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2332-2333. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx506. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 102877
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.