Effect of ON-tDCS on Memory Function Improvement and Related Circuits in Stable Depression Patients

November 22, 2022 updated by: First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Greater Occipital Nerve on Memory Function Improvement and and the Locus Coeruleus-Noradrenergic Circuits in Stable Depression Patients

So far, antidepressant drugs have limited memory improvement. Transcranial direct current stimulation, as a non-invasive and safe neuroregulatory technique, is a new direction to improve memory.In this study, transcranial direct current stimulation of the greater occipital nerve was used to explore the effect of improving memory function in patients with stable depression, and related studies were conducted on the locus coeruleus-noadrenal loop and the functional connection between locus coeruleus, hippocampus and amygdala.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In this study, a randomized, controlled, double-blind design was adopted. Patients with depression were randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group to receive true or fake tDCS stimulation respectively. Clinical data, memory and other related cognitive function assessment, EEG, resting state fMRI, saliva and blood indicators were collected two weeks before and two weeks after the intervention, and followed up for eight weeks. Finally, data correlation analysis was performed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Zhejiang
      • Hanzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310009
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Eligible for ICD-10 depressive episode (F32) or recurrent depressive disorder (F33) diagnosis;
  2. Antidepressant therapy for at least 8 weeks, with no antidepressant adjustment for nearly 2 months
  3. HAMD-17 scores ≤ 7 points at the time of enrollment; CGI score ≦2;
  4. Chief complaint of memory impairment, PDQ-D score of cognitive impairment ≧17 points;
  5. Right-handed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. A history of major physical diseases;
  2. Have other mental disorders that meet the diagnostic criteria of ICD-10;
  3. Hearing, color blindness, color weakness or receive electroconvulsive therapy;
  4. Alcohol dependence or substance abuse;
  5. Patients with intellectual disability;
  6. Pregnant or lactating women or those planning to become pregnant;
  7. Patients with contraindications to tDCS.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Active ON-tDCS
The active group will receive the active transcranial direct current stimulation via a saline-soaked pair of surface sponges. Patients received this treatment protocol for 5 consecutive days.
Device: Active ON-tDCS
DC was transmitted via a saline-soaked pair of surface sponges and delivered by specially developed, battery-driven, constant current stimulator with a maximum output of 2 mA. For each participant receiving ON-tDCS, the anodal electrode placed over the left C2 nerve dermatome, and cathodal electrode placed over the right C2 dermatome. A constant current of 1.5 mA was applied for 20 min.
Sham Comparator: Sham ON-tDCS
The sham group will also receive the transcranial direct current stimulation for 5 consecutive days on sham procedure. The rationale behind this sham procedure was to mimic the transient skin sensation at the beginning of active ON-tDCS without producing any conditioning effects on the brain.
Device: Sham ON-tDCS
For sham group, placement of the electrodes was identical to that of active ON-tDCS. ON-tDCS was first switched on in a ramp-up fashion over 5 s. Current intensity (ramp down) was gradually reduced (over 5 s) as soon as ON-tDCS reached a current flow of 1.5 mA. Hence, sham ON-tDCS only lasted 10 s (as opposed to 20 min in the active group).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in working memory test scores after intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-week, 2-month
The working memory test consists of two parts, which measure the breadth and accuracy of working memory respectively. The breadth of working memory will be tested using the operating span experiment, as the accuracy of working memory will be tested using the Memory Orientation experiment.
Baseline, 2-week, 2-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in three component test of executive function scores after intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-week, 2-month
The three component tests of executive function were one-backward test, anti-saccade and shifting test respectively.In the one-backward test, subjects need to memorize letters while counting numbers, scoring them according to the accuracy of the alphabetic memory order; The anti-saccade test asks subjects to react to a flash of arrows (0.5 seconds) by selecting the direction they see on a keyboard；The shifting test asked subjects to select a forward or reverse feedback key depending on where the icon appeared.
Baseline, 2-week, 2-month
Change in the test of logical memory on the Wechsler Memory Test score after intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-week, 2-month
The test asked participants to retell a story they had heard and rate how well they recalled it
Baseline, 2-week, 2-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 22, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IIT20221169

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings