Comparison of Body Mass Index and Metabolic Score for Visceral Adiposity in Evaluation of Visceral Adiposity

December 18, 2022 updated by: Cundullah Torun, Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcın City Hospital

Comparison of the Body Mass Index, Visceral Adiposity Index, the Body Shape Index, and the Body Roundness Index With the Metabolic Score for Visceral Adiposity in the Assessment of Visceral Adiposity

Visceral obesity is a major risk factor for cardiometabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. In clinical settings and during research, "body mass index (BMI)" is usually used for assessing obesity, and when it is above 30 kg/m2, it is defined as obesity. However, the risk posed by obesity is more related to body fat distribution than total body fat, and BMI only reflects the second. Individuals with a BMI below 30, even 25, may still have visceral adiposity detectable via an abdominal computerized tomography ( CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Therefore new, practical, inexpensive parameters are needed to evaluate visceral adiposity. "Metabolic Score for Visceral Adiposity (METS-VF)", "Body Shape Index (BSI)", "Conicity Index (CI)" and "Body Roundness Index (BRI)" are a few recent indexes developed trying to fulfill these needs. The aim is to investigate the effectivity of METS-VF in comparison with BMI, BSI, CI, and BRI in reflecting visceral adiposity assessed with CT.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

This study is a single-center, observational and prospective study. Patients who underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) covering the L3-L4 level in the last month for any reason and who did not have any of the following situations in the participants' CT reports: malignancy, pancreatitis, diseases requiring further investigation, chronic inflammatory diseases, and a pathology requiring hospitalization for more than 24 hours, will be invited to the study. Of the patients who consent to the study, gender, age, education level, current diseases, medications, and smoking status are questioned. Anthropometric measurements, especially waist, height, and weight are taken. Patients' biochemical parameters such as lipid profiles (LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, Triglyceride), urea, creatinine, uric acid, fasting blood glucose, and C-peptide levels (after 8-12 hours of fasting), and thyroid hormones were measured in the last three months are recorded from the participants' files. The body mass index (BMI) of the patients will be calculated with the formula weight (kg) / height (m)2. Patients will be in 5 groups with BMI <25 kg/m2, 25-29.9 kg/m2, 30-34.9 kg/m2, 35-39.9 kg/m2, and >40 kg/m2, with 40 patients in each group. Visceral adipose tissue will be calculated by the radiologist by measuring with the "slicer" method at the level of L3-4 on abdominal CT. For "Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF)", the formula 4.466 + 0.011*(Ln(METS-IR))3 + 3.239*(Ln(Waist/height ratio))3 + 0.319*(Gender) + 0.594*(Ln(Age)) and for "Body Waist Circumference" the formula (BMI2/3 * height1/2) are used. Based on the visceral adipose tissue measured by CT, firstly, BMI and METS-VF will be compared, and then the other mentioned anthropometric index values will be compared statistically. The assumption is that the METS-VF index is superior to the other indexes, including the BMI. Also, as a second endpoint, it is aimed to find a cut-off value for METS-VF in Turkish individuals to reflect the increased visceral adiposity assessed with CT.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
194

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Istanbul Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 46 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged between 20 and 50 years old who underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging, including the L3-L4 level for any reason in the last month, with no detectable malignancy, pancreatitis, diseases requiring further investigation, chronic inflammatory diseases, and a pathology necessitating hospitalization for more than 24 hours in the CT evaluation, we're invited to the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having consented to the work
  • Having a computed tomography of the abdomen taken within the last month
  • Having a biochemistry analysis including lipid levels in the last three months
  • No weight loss in the last 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Antihyperlipidemic medication usage
  • Presence of active malignancy
  • Having an anatomical structure that is not suitable for taking anthropometric measurements
  • The use medications that might affect metabolic values such as steroids
  • Chronic inflammatory diseases, acute infection and other lipodystrophic syndromes (HIV etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Superiority of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the Body Mass Index (BMI) for visceral adiposity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the evaluation of visceral adiposity compared with the Body Mass Index (BMI). For METS-VF, a cut-off value will be determined. For BMI values 20-24.9 are accepted as normal, 25-29.9 as overweight and above 30 as obese (with different categories), whereas below 20 as underweight.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
The Superiority of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) for visceral adiposity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The number of participants whose visceral adiposity, which was evaluated by abdominal computerized tomography, was correctly assessed by using the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) and Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) for which higher values are predicted to reflect higher adiposity.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
The Superiority of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the Body Shape Index (ABSI) for visceral adiposity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The number of participants whose visceral adiposity, which was evaluated by abdominal computerized tomography, was correctly assessed by using the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) and the Body Shape Index (ABSI) for which higher values are predicted to reflect higher adiposity.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
The Superiority of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the Body Roundness Index (BRI) for visceral adiposity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The number of participants whose visceral adiposity, which was evaluated by abdominal computerized tomography, was correctly assessed by using the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) and the Body Roundness Index (BRI) for which higher values are predicted to reflect higher adiposity.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
The Superiority of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the evaluation of visceral adiposity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The number of participants whose visceral adiposity, which was evaluated by abdominal computerized tomography, was correctly assessed by using the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) and the other defined indexes, the Body Mass Index (BMI), Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI), the Body Shape Index (ABSI), and the Body Roundness Index (BRI) with the purpose of finding the best discriminator for visceral adiposity.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determination of a cut-off point for METS-VF score associated with increased Visceral Adiposity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Using receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis with the calculated input from the abdominal computerized tomography and the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) index. METS-VF index is a continuous index with no definite cut-off value. For different populations a new cut-off point is calculated, which it is also aimed in this study. The higher the score, the higher is the expected visceral adiposity.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcın City Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Cundullah Torun, MD, Istanbul Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Egitim mah. Kadıköy/ İstanbul, TURKEY

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 18, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • METSVF-adiposity

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings