Efficacy of Citicoline Eye Drops 2% on Visual Field Preservation in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma

March 8, 2024 updated by: Omikron Italia S.r.l.

A Phase III Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Trial of the Efficacy of Citicoline Eye Drops 2% on Visual Field Preservation in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma

To evaluate the efficacy of citicoline eye drops 2% in reducing visual field deterioration in patients with progressing OAG treated according to best clinical practice. Secondary objectives are assessing the effect of citicoline eye drops 2% on changes in structural parameters measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) and evaluating the safety of citicoline eye drops 2%

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background: Primary open angle glaucoma (OAG) is a chronic progressive neurodegenerative disease where intraocular pressure (IOP) is the main and successfully treatable risk factor. Although the treatment effect is quite large, a significant proportion of patients show disease progression with apparently well controlled IOP. Given the similarities with other neurodegenerative diseases - particularly in the mechanisms of cell death - neuroprotective treatments have been tested also in glaucoma. Interesting results from experimental studies and first evidence from human glaucoma trials have been published in recent years.

Citicoline is one of the promising molecules with a putative neuroprotective action and has been evaluated in patients with various neurodegenerative diseases with encouraging results. The mechanism of action of citicoline is multifarious and includes preservation of cardiolipin and sphingomyelin, restoration of phosphatidylcholine, stimulation of glutathione synthesis, lowering of glutamate concentration, rescuing mitochondrial function, and others. Pilot studies on glaucomatous patients showed a possible effect of citicoline as additive therapy in the treatment of glaucoma, in reducing progression of visual field changes, in protecting retinal nerve fiber layers and in improving vision related Quality of Life (QoL), though these findings are yet to be confirmed by a large randomized clinical trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • MI
      • Milano, MI, Italy, 20142
        • Recruiting
        • Presidio Ospedale San Paolo
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed written informed consent.
  2. Age ≥ 18 years.
  3. Eyes with OAG, Pseudoexfoliation and pigmentary glaucoma will be included.
  4. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) ≥ 0.5 for the study eye.
  5. Controlled IOP (≤ 18 mmHg, average of the last 3 measurements in the clinic) in the study eye.
  6. Visual field MD not worse than -12 dB at the latest assessment in the clinic for the study eye.
  7. Deteriorating MD at a rate between -0.5 dB/year and -1.0 dB/year, estimated from the latest VF tests collected in the clinic (at least 4) over a period during which incisional glaucoma surgery was not performed. Combinations of SITA Standard and Fast strategies (but not SITA Faster) is admissible. Patients who reach the desired minimum number of tests (4) with a mixture of SITA Standard/Fast and SITA Faster tests will need to perform additional replacement tests according to the prevalent strategy used in their series of VF (i.e. additional SITA Standard/Fast tests if ≤ 2 tests were SITA Faster; additional SITA Faster if > 2 tests were SITA Faster).
  8. Glaucoma definition will be based on VF damage (24-2, any SITA strategy) and spatially congruent glaucomatous changes at the ONH. If both eyes are eligible, the eye with the better MD will be chosen as the study eye.
  9. Women of childbearing potential willing to use an appropriate method of contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cataract in the study eye which, in the opinion of the clinician, may require cataract surgery within the next three years.
  2. Only-eye patients (visual acuity < 0.1 decimals in one eye or more than two paracentral VF locations with a sensitivity of < 10 dB).
  3. Known intolerance or allergy to any of the components in the eye drops.
  4. Diode laser treatment or glaucoma surgery in the past 2 years or cataract surgery within the last 6 months in the study eye.
  5. Eyes with any type of glaucoma other than primary, pseudoexfoliative or pigmentary OAG.
  6. Patients with other ocular or systemic comorbidities that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might affect the VF or the execution of the test.
  7. Patients already on topical or systemic citicoline treatment.
  8. Patients taking other systemic or topical potential neuroprotectors competing with citicoline eye drops 2% (a list will be provided) unwilling to suspend these treatments and undergo a washout period of 6 months prior to the study.
  9. Patients unable to perform reliable VF tests, based on the assessment of the last 4 available 24-2 Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) VF tests performed in the clinic with a false positive rate (FP) ≤ 15%.
  10. Pregnant and nursing patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: citicoline eye drops 2%
Citicoline eye drops 2%. One drop in the study eye three times daily throughout the 3-year trial. Patients will be treated with any IOP-lowering agent to control IOP and study treatments should be administered at least 20 minutes after IOP lowering medication.
Drug: Citicoline eye drops 2%
Eye drops containing Citicoline 2%
Placebo Comparator: Placebo eye drops
Placebo eye drops. One drop in the study eye three times daily throughout the 3-year trial. Patients will be treated with any IOP-lowering agent to control IOP and study treatments should be administered at least 20 minutes after IOP lowering medication
Drug: Placebo
Eye drops containing placebo matching product

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression of visual field damage
Time Frame: 3 years
Difference in the rate of progression of VF damage in the study eye between the two trial arms. This will be measured with repeated, planned visual field (VF) tests, all performed with a Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA, Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) with the SITA Standard 24-2 strategy, over the span of three years.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of progression in structural parameters
Time Frame: 3 years

Difference in the rate of progression in structural parameters. These parameters focus on the ocular structures mostly damaged by glaucoma. The parameters of interest will be:

  • RNFL thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).
  • Inner retina thickness in the macula (RNFL, Ganglion Cell Layer and Ganglion Cell + Inner Plexiform Layer complex).
3 years
Safety (IOP)
Time Frame: 3 years
Safety will be assured by regular assessments of adverse events and IOP. IOP will be carefully monitored and managed as per standard clinical practice (detailed management of IOP is reported later). Side effects from the neuroprotective drops or any IOP lowering treatment, including allergic reactions, ocular surface toxicity and signs of extraocular or intraocular inflammation, will be carefully assessed by the examiners and reported in the case report form (CRF). Any significant discomfort or adverse reactions to the drops or clear signs of inflammation will be reasons for early withdrawal
3 years
Visual Field recovery
Time Frame: 3 years
Evidence of neuro-recovery. The Visual field Mean Deviation values (2 tests) at Visit 2 will be compared between the two groups, after adjusting for the MD values at Visit 1 (baseline, 2 tests).
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Omikron Italia S.r.l.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
OPIS Spain

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 11, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 8, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OMK1P3

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glaucoma, Open-Angle

Clinical Trials on Citicoline eye drops 2%

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings