The Effect of Dietary Interventions, or no Intervention, on Pain and Quality of Life in Women Diagnosed With Endometriosis (Dieetstudie)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081HV
- Amsterdam AMC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
- CHILD
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women diagnosed with endometriosis, either through radiologic imaging (transvaginal ultrasound and/or MRI) or laparoscopy
- A reported pain score of ≥ 3 (Visual Analogue Score (VAS), scale 0-10cm) in one or more of the following symptoms: dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia and chronic pelvic pain
Exclusion Criteria:
- about to undergo an operation within six months
- Undergone an operation in the past six weeks
- a switch in hormonal therapy within six weeks
- Women that were pregnant or breastfeeding
- women diagnosed with a malignancy
- An additional diagnosis with Coeliac Disease (CD) and/or lactose intolerance.
- Not sufficient in the Dutch or English language.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Control group: no diet adherence
Women were asked to complete three questionnaires, once every two months.
These contained the EHP-30 and GIQLI.
The first questionnaire contained questions on their demographics, and whether they applied a diet before.
|
|
|
OTHER: Intervention group: adherence to Low FODMAP diet
Women could choose to adhere to the low FODMAP diet, over a period of six months.
In the first three months, they received extensive guidance by a dietician in training, in addition to supportive materials such as the Monash app, recipes and grocery lists, in the hope of optimal adherence to the diet.
After three months, women were asked to continue the diet independently.
In addition, women were asked to complete three questionnaires, one every two months.
The questionnaires contained the EHP-30, the GIQLI, and self composed questions on their demographics in the first questionnaire, and their strictness of adherence in the second and third questionnaire.
The third questionnaire also contained questions on their satisfaction with the dietary guidance and the dietician in training.
|
The Low FODMAP diet is an avoidance diet and consist of three phases.
In the first phase, all nutrients high in FODMAPs (high-FODMAPS) are eliminated from the daily diet over a period of 2 to 6 weeks to calm down the bowel.
The second phase consists of the addition of FODMAP challenges.
During this phase the patient continues the Low FODMAP diet, but will reintroduce one high-FODMAP nutrient once every three days to see whether exposure to this high-FODMAP causes IBS symptoms.
When this is not the case, the patient can continue eating this high-FODMAP group in their daily diet.
In the third and final phase, the diet is fully personalized.
This personalization is based on whether the patient tolerated the high-FODMAP nutrient or not during the FODMAP challenges.
Only when the high-FODMAP nutrient is not tolerated, it is advised to permanently remove it from the daily diet.
|
|
OTHER: Intervention group: adherence to endometriosis diet
Women could choose to adhere to the endometriosis diet, over a period of six months.
In the first three months, they received extensive guidance by a dietician in training, in addition to supportive materials such as the Monash app, recipes and grocery lists, in the hope of optimal adherence to the diet.
After three months, women were asked to continue the diet independently.
In addition, women were asked to complete three questionnaires, one every two months.
The questionnaires contained the EHP-30, the GIQLI, and self composed questions on their demographics in the first questionnaire, and their strictness of adherence in the second and third questionnaire.
The third questionnaire also contained questions on their satisfaction with the dietary guidance and the dietician in training.
|
The endometriosis diet The endometriosis diet is a patient experience based, avoidance diet developed by women diagnosed with endometriosis.
Therefore no specific recommendations exist regarding the application of the endometriosis diet.
With the endometriosis diet, women avoid nutrients they noticed provoked or aggravated their endometriosis-related symptoms such as red meat, coffee, sugar, lactose and soy.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
pain scores
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The primary outcome focused on pain scores (in VAS, scale 0-10cm) of the endometriosis-related symptoms dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, dysuria, dyschezia, tiredness and bloating.
Pain scores will be measured on a scale between 0 and 10, where 0 represents no pain at all and 10 the worst pain possible.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life (QoL)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Secondary outcome focused on QoL, expressed using the EHP-30 questionnaire.
Using the EHP-30, a score between 0 and 100 can be measured for 11 different QoL domains.
For every domain, a score of 0 represents best health status through to a score of 100 which represents worst health status.
|
6 months
|
|
Gastro-Intestinal Health
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Secondary outcome focused on gastro-intestinal health, expressed using the GIQLI questionnaire.
With the GIQLI, a score between 0 and 144 can be calculated where 0 represents worst possible gastro-intestinal health and 144 best possible gastro-intestinal health.
|
6 months
|
|
Adhesion to dietary intervention
Time Frame: 6 months
|
with every follow-up visit, women were asked on their dietary adhesion.
they were asked how often they made an exception, with what meal (snack/main meal) and what strictness score they gave themselves.
Women could score their strictness between 0 and 10 where 0 represented worst possible strictness and 10 best possible strictness
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- W20_534 # 20.593
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.