CorEvitas Alopecia Areata (AA) Safety and Effectiveness Registry

February 5, 2026 updated by: CorEvitas
Prospective, observational cohort study for subjects with AA under the care of a dermatology provider. Approximately 5,000 subjects and 100 clinical sites in North America will be recruited to participate with no defined upper limit for either target.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The objective of the registry is to create a cohort of AA subjects to study long-term safety and effectiveness of AA treatments. Because the long-term understanding of safety and efficacy is still limited even after regulatory approval,enrollment and long-term follow-up of a large number of diverse real-world patients exposed to therapies of interest is important to understand safety and effectiveness. The observational structured data collected will be used to better characterize the natural history of the disease and to extensively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of medications approved for the treatment of AA to support ongoing risk benefit evaluation by drug manufacturers and regulators.Further, data collected will inform clinical decision making by subjects and treating providers. This will be done through the standardized collection of validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and clinician-reported outcomes (ClinRO), the active evaluation of prevalent and incident comorbidities and adverse events, and the recording of medication utilization patterns. Personal information is also collected from each consenting registry subject allowing for linkages to other public or private clinical and administrative databases, as well as to databases maintained by organizations focused on the care and treatment of AA for the purposes of clinical, market, or outcomes research. This provides an opportunity to evaluate other aspects of the disease and its treatment including but not limited to clinical and drug cost-effectiveness, health care resource utilization, and subject adherence.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients are enrolled in the AA Registry during regularly scheduled office visits. Selected dermatologists are invited to participate as investigators in the Registry.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A subject must meet all the following criteria to participate in the registry:

    1. Has been diagnosed with alopecia areata by a dermatologist or a qualified dermatology practitioner.
    2. Is at least 18 years of age or older.
    3. Is willing to provide Personal Information.
    4. Is prescribed or starting an Enrollment Eligible Medication at the time of enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any of the following would exclude the subject from participating in the registry:

    1. Is participating or planning to participate in a double-blind randomized trial for an AA drug. Note:

Concurrent participation in another observational registry or open-label Phase 3b/4 trial is allowed.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Alopecia Areata
Pts presenting to enrolling sites across the US are invited to enroll if eligible

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alopecia epidemiology, presentation, natural history, management, and outcomes
Time Frame: A minimum of 10 years from last patient enrolled
The major clinical outcomes include an assessment of the epidemiology of AA; to better understand the presentation, natural history, management and outcomes.
A minimum of 10 years from last patient enrolled

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Physician Reported - Skindex-16
Time Frame: every 6 months for 10 years
every 6 months for 10 years
Physician Reported - Alopecia Areata Symptom Impact Scale (AASIS)
Time Frame: every 6 months for 10 years
every 6 months for 10 years
Physician Reported - Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time Frame: every 6 months for 10 years
every 6 months for 10 years
Physician Reported - Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT)
Time Frame: every 6 months for 10 years
every 6 months for 10 years
Physician Reported - Alopecia Areata-Investigator Global Assessment (AA-IGA)
Time Frame: every 6 months for 10 years
every 6 months for 10 years
Physician Reported - ClinRo Measure for Eyebrow, Eyelash Hair Loss & Nail Appearance
Time Frame: every 6 months for 10 years
every 6 months for 10 years
Physician Reported - Alopecia Areata Scale (AAS)
Time Frame: every 6 months for 10 years
every 6 months for 10 years
Patient Reported - Scalp Hair Assessment PRO
Time Frame: every 6 months for 10 years
every 6 months for 10 years
Patient Reported - PRO Measure for Eyebrows, Eyelashes & Nail Apperance
Time Frame: every 6 months for 10 years
every 6 months for 10 years
Patient Reported - Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)
Time Frame: every 6 months for 10 years
every 6 months for 10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
CorEvitas

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 25, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2099

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2099

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 5, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CorEvitas-AA-560

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings