Perilunate Management
Outcomes of Perilunate Injury Management: Open vs Arthroscopic Approach
Perilunate injuries can be debilitating injuries that involve the carpus. These can limit patients' functionality both acutely and long-term. Not only do their potential for nerve injury increase risk of lasting weakness and chronic pain, but their complex surrounding involving the carpus also leads to potential for misalignment when healing. The approach for treating perilunate injuries often relies on internal fixation, prompting the need for surgery. However, there is no clear recommendation for whether to pursue open or arthroscopic surgery as both offer benefits and pose risks.
The aim of this study is to determine the similarities and differences in outcomes for management of perilunate injuries.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Perilunate injuries are those that affect the wrist, which can be debilitating to patients. Often, these injuries require surgical treatment, which can either be performed open or arthroscopically. There is currently no consensus on which approach offers better outcomes. Therefore, this study will allocate patients who require surgical treatment of perilunate injuries to either open or arthroscopic surgical intervention to compare their outcomes. The results will offer insight into the compromises made with each surgical approach and create a foundation that orthopedic surgeons can leverage to decide how to manage a patient to ensure the best possible outcomes.
This study will involve 12 patients who were identified as having perilunate injuries requiring orthopedic surgical treatment. Their participation will involve consenting to be randomly allocated to the surgical approach, and they will be asked to complete commonly used orthopedic surveys (e.g., DASH score) that are used to evaluate the functional healing of their injury. They will be followed up for up to 1 year after their surgery. A chart review will be conducted to follow their progress and surgical outcomes.
Patients will be recruited from Grady Memorial Hospital. No specimens will be collected or banked for this study.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Nicole Zelenski, MD
- Phone Number: 404-255-0226
- Email: nicole.ann.zelenski@emory.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jasone Barron
- Phone Number: 404-778-3242
- Email: jason.barron@emory.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30303
- Grady Memorial Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All adult patients (18 years old and older).
- Patients requiring surgical intervention for a perilunate injury will be consented and then randomly allocated to either open or arthroscopic surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prisoners will not be included in this study.
- Patients younger than 18 years old and pregnant patients will be excluded from this review.
- Patients who require a specific surgical approach for their treatment cannot be randomly allocated to one of the study arms, so they will be excluded from this study.
- The study will not include data from minors, cognitively impaired individuals, or individuals who are vulnerable to coercion or under the influence.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Open procedure
The study intervention involved in this project is the randomized allocation of the patient who requires surgical treatment of their perilunate injury to receive either an open or arthroscopic approach for the procedure. Once the patient is in agreement to have surgery and has consented to partake in the study, they will be randomly allocated to either open perilunate surgery or arthroscopic perilunate surgery. Both surgical approaches are well-recognized, common, standard-of-care procedures. |
The open approach requires dissection of capsuloligamentous structures, which can lead to stiffness of the joint due to capsular scarring as it heals.
However, it offers good visual field when treating the injury, allowing maneuverability to avoid iatrogenic soft tissue injuries.
|
|
Active Comparator: Arthroscopic Procedure
The study intervention involved in this project is the randomized allocation of the patient who requires surgical treatment of their perilunate injury to receive either an open or arthroscopic approach for the procedure. Once the patient is in agreement to have surgery and has consented to partake in the study, they will be randomly allocated to either open perilunate surgery or arthroscopic perilunate surgery. Both surgical approaches are well-recognized, common, standard-of-care procedures. |
Arthroscopic approach involves smaller incision, offering less traumatic procedures and faster healing, but due to the limited space in this closed field with significant vasculature and nerve distribution, scoping has increased risk for iatrogenic injuries.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-operation
|
The numeric rating scale is one of the most commonly used pain scales in medicine.
The NRS consists of a numeric version of the visual analog scale.
The most common form of the NRS is a horizontal line with an eleven point numeric range.
It is labeled from zero to ten, with zero being an example of someone with no pain and ten being the worst pain possible.
|
12 weeks post-operation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Range of motion
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-operation
|
Range of motion (ROM) means the extent or limit to which a part of the body can be moved around a joint or a fixed point; the totality of movement a joint is capable of doing.
A range of motion test, also called a flexibility test, is used to measure the degree of movement of a joint.
A goniometer is an instrument that is used to measure the range of motion of a joint.
|
12 weeks post-operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nicole Zelenski, MD, Assistant Professor
- Principal Investigator: Eric R Wagner, MD, Assistant Professor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00005088
- 2025P013453 (Other Identifier: Emory Insight Humans IRB)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.