Nut Supplementation to Mitigate Post-stroke Cognitive Decline (NUT-me)

November 19, 2024 updated by: Barbara R. Cardoso, Monash University

Nut Supplementation to Mitigate Post-stroke Cognitive Decline (NUT-me): a Pilot Study

Stroke is a strong risk factor for dementia, with up to 80% of individuals having lower cognitive function 5 years after a stroke event. However, having a stroke does not need to result in declining cognition if effective strategies to reduce the risk of post stroke dementia are identified. Diets containing nuts can reduce the risk of both dementia and stroke but have not been tested in stroke survivors. Therefore, this pilot study aims to determine whether eating nuts regularly reduces post-stroke cognitive decline and dementia. The NUT-me pilot study will supplement the diet of stroke survivors with a mix of nuts containing walnuts, hazelnuts, almonds and Brazil nuts for 3 months and assess the effects on cognition and health markers. The researchers predict that regular nut consumption will contribute to preserving post-stroke cognitive function in comparison to patients who do not consume nuts. The results of this novel pilot study will be used to guide a larger trial and provide a simple dietary strategy that stroke survivors can adopt to reduce post-stroke cognitive decline.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Suspended

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study will investigate the efficacy and feasibility of supplementing the habitual diet of stroke survivors with a supply of mixed nuts containing Brazil nut, walnuts, hazelnuts, and almonds to reduce post-stroke cognitive decline. The overall aim of this project will be achieved through the following objectives:

  • Examine the feasibility through the assessment of compliance with the intervention and participants' perception of the study
  • Investigate the efficacy of the intervention on cognitive decline, body composition and health outcomes (blood pressure, fasting glucose and insulin, and blood lipids) The investigators hypothesise that the inclusion of nuts is a simple dietary strategy that will slow post-stroke cognitive decline and that supplementation with nuts will improve body composition and health biomarkers of stroke survivors.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3168
        • Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food - Monash University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ischaemic stroke (first or recurrent stroke) in the last 6 months
  • Able to attend 4 study visits over 3 months
  • Motivation and willingness to participate in the study protocol
  • No prior neurological or psychiatric disease, including dementia
  • Can give informed consent and participate in cognitive testing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • be < 18 years;
  • have allergy to nuts
  • have premorbid modified Rankin scale (mRS)≥4, denoting no severe disability
  • incapable of giving consent
  • have problems with mastication that preclude nut intake
  • have habitual consumption of tree nuts (>2 servings/wk) in the previous 2 months
  • have habitual consumption of alpha-linolenic acid supplements (fish oil, flaxseed oil, and/or soy lecithin)
  • have dementia or psychiatric disease
  • do not speak English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Nut Group
Participants will receive a supply of mixed nuts containing: 1 Brazil nut (~3g), walnuts (15g), hazelnuts (7g), and almonds (7g) to be consumed daily for 90 days. They will also receive dietary counselling on how to follow the Australian Dietary Guidelines.
Other: Nuts
  • A mix of nuts containing 1 Brazil nut (~3g), walnuts (15g), hazelnuts (7g), and almonds (7g) to be consumed daily for 90 days.
  • Dietary counselling on how to follow the Australian Dietary Guidelines
Other: Control Group
Participants will follow the same protocol as the Nut group regarding appointments and collection of information. At the visits, they will receive dietary counselling on how to follow the Australian Dietary Guidelines
Other: Control
- Dietary counselling on how to follow the Australian Dietary Guidelines

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Function Composite Score
Time Frame: 90 days
Cognitive performance after the 90-day intervention will be assessed in comparison to baseline by using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery V3. This validated battery encompasses 15 tests that are combined to generate composite scores by age: Crystalised Composite (which includes picture vocabulary and oral reading recognition tests) and Fluid Composite (which includes dimensional change card sort, flanker, picture sequence memory, list sorting, and pattern comparison tests).The Cognitive Function Composite Score is a combination of both crystallized and fluid scores. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fluid Cognition Composite Score
Time Frame: 90 days
Cognitive performance after the 90-day intervention will be assessed in comparison to baseline by using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery V3. This validated battery encompasses 15 tests that are combined to generate composite scores by age: Crystalised Composite (which includes picture vocabulary and oral reading recognition tests) and Fluid Composite (which includes dimensional change card sort, flanker, picture sequence memory, list sorting, and pattern comparison tests).The Cognitive Function Composite Score is a combination of both crystallized and fluid scores. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.
90 days
Crystallized Cognition Composite Score
Time Frame: 90 days
Cognitive performance after the 90-day intervention will be assessed in comparison to baseline by using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery V3. This validated battery encompasses 15 tests that are combined to generate composite scores by age: Crystalised Composite (which includes picture vocabulary and oral reading recognition tests) and Fluid Composite (which includes dimensional change card sort, flanker, picture sequence memory, list sorting, and pattern comparison tests).The Cognitive Function Composite Score is a combination of both crystallized and fluid scores. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.
90 days
% body fat
Time Frame: 90 days
Changes in % body fat measured using bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)
90 days
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 90 days
Changes in the presence of depressive symptoms assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The score ranges from zero to 27, with higher scores indicating worse depressive symptoms.
90 days
HOMA-IR
Time Frame: 90 days
HOMA-IR is a measure of insulin resistance. It is calculated according to the formula: fasting insulin (microU/L) x fasting glucose (nmol/L)/22.5.
90 days
Blood lipids
Time Frame: 90 days
Changes in total cholesterol, LDL, HDL and triglycerides
90 days
Inflammatory markers
Time Frame: 90 days
Changes in the composite of the following inflammatory markers: IL-6, IL-1β, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-1ra
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Monash University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Barbara R Cardoso, PhD, Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food - Monash University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 19, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NUT-me

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This is a small pilot study and the generated data will be used only by the Principal Investigator as preliminary data in grant applications and potentially one publication (yet to be decided).

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings