Establishing Clinical Utility Evidence for Chronic Disease Management Testing Patient Study

April 1, 2024 updated by: Qure Healthcare, LLC

Establishing Clinical Utility Evidence for Chronic Disease Management Testing: A CPV® and Chart Abstraction Randomized Controlled Trial

This is a national-level research study of primary care physicians. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical evaluation and management (drug, procedures, counseling, and others) of a subset of common patient care indications.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In the original study protocol (approved on October 19th, 2021), which the investigators are now referring to as Phase 1, the investigators measured changes in clinical practice using Clinical Performance and Value (CPVs) vignettes, described below. Phase 1 utilized simulated patients to determine clinical variation in the management of chronic cardiometabolic diseases and assessed the impact of the CDMT results on physicians' clinical decision-making.

CPVs are QURE's scientifically-validated measurement tool, first described in JAMA, 2000, and now used in scores of scientific investigations. In this research and derivative peer-reviewed publications, QURE's CPV studies efficiently measure clinical practice patterns among active physicians to determine if there is value in new technologies to payers.

This amendment allows us to ask the same physicians if they change their practice in an actual clinical setting.

Phase 2 extends the findings from Phase 1 by measuring the change in clinical practice using CPVs and securing data on practice patterns from abstracted medical records. the investigators will look for the same changes the investigators found in Phase 1 to determine the impact of CDMT on real-world clinical decisions and patient outcomes. The advantage of Phase 2 is that it leverages the same sample frame and the randomization by returning to the physicians in Round 1 who indicated that CDMT would change their practice. These physicians will be given, free of charge, the option of using CDMT on their real patients who share similar medical diagnoses as the CPV simulated patients. Phase 2 will thus provide patient-level data on the impact of medication adherence assessment on quality outcomes including, but not limited to, blood pressure control, blood sugar control, and parameters of disease progression

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
114

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94109
        • QURE Healthcare

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Board-certified physician currently practicing in either Family Medicine or Internal Medicine.
  • Have practiced as a board-certified physician in internal or family medicine or greater than 2 but less than 30 years
  • Community/non-academic based practice setting
  • ≥ 40 patients under care weekly
  • Commonly treats patients with atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia
  • Patient HIPAA Authorization form signed upon initial enrollment into the provider's practice
  • Practicing in the U.S.
  • English-speaking
  • Access to the internet
  • Informed and voluntarily consented to be in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not a board-certified physician
  • Not practicing in the United States
  • Not informed and voluntarily consented to be in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Control Group
These participants will complete their online simulations and treat their real-life patients without access to the Aegis test.
Experimental: Educational Materials and Test Access
These participants will complete their online simulations and treat their real-life patients with access to educational materials and the Aegis test results. Investigators will compare intervention participants' clinical recommendations to those in the control arm.
Diagnostic test: Aegis CDM Test and Educational Materials
The Aegis CDM diagnostic test will be given to intervention participants to use on their patients. The participants will receive the results of the test through a web portal. Investigators will analyze the differences in quality of care between the control arm and the intervention arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chart abstraction measured variation in quantity of care
Time Frame: [19 months]

Measuring the difference in the quality of care between the control arm and the intervention arm as measured by the number of care decisions made in the second round of chart abstraction.

These care decisions might include decisions such as avoidance of invasive diagnostic tests, reductions in unneeded specialist referrals, increased diagnosis and treatment of drug-drug interactions, or care decisions related to costs.
[19 months]
Chart abstraction measured variation in quality of care
Time Frame: [19 months]

Measuring the difference in the quality of care between the control arm and the intervention arm as measured by the quality of care decisions made in the second round of chart abstraction.

These care decisions might include decisions such as avoidance of invasive diagnostic tests, reductions in unneeded specialist referrals, increased diagnosis and treatment of drug-drug interactions, or care decisions related to costs.
[19 months]
Chart abstraction measured variation in clinical decisions
Time Frame: [19 months]
Measuring the variation in amount of evidence based clinical decisions among practicing primary care physicians in the assessment, recognition, and adjustment of treatment due to medication non-adherence and DDIs in patients with chronic cardiometabolic diseases.
[19 months]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Qure Healthcare, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 19, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 20, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00060013

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiometabolic Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Aegis CDM Test and Educational Materials

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings