Pharmacologic Treatment in Legal Offenders With Schizophrenia, a Prospective Observational Mirror Image Study.

December 1, 2025 updated by: Stephan T. Egger, Psychiatric University Hospital, Zurich

Pharmacologic Treatment in Legal Offenders With Schizophrenia, a Prospective Observational Mirror Image Study

Considering the vulnerability of patients with schizophrenia in forensic treatment, we have designed a prospective-observational trial. The purpose of our study, notably its focus on selecting the appropriate medication, developing clinical profiles, and determining the grounds of clinical judgment, is relevant for treating patients with schizophrenia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder who commit violent crimes appear to have some distinguishing characteristics. The current view is that crime committed in the course of a psychiatric illness, particularly schizophrenia, is treatable and preventable. Nonetheless, treatment options for this patient group are sparse. The evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of such treatments is practically nonexistent. In practice therapeutic options are limited to medication and even here there is only one antipsychotic (clozapine) which has The current view is that crime committed during a psychiatric illness, particularly schizophrenia, is treatable and preventable. Nonetheless, treatment options for this patient group are sparse. The evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of such treatments is practically nonexistent. In practice, therapeutic options are limited to medication; even here, almost no controlled clinical trials are investigating this issue.

In clinical practice, selecting specific psychopharmacological treatments for patients with schizophrenia showing violent or aggressive behavior is particularly demanding. The lack of evidence regarding treatments for this particular group is partly attributable to their dual vulnerability and the consequent restrictions on clinical and experimental trials. Paradoxically, the efforts to ensure the safety and rights of these patients put them at a disadvantage, as they have no access to evidence-based treatment for their condition. Therefore, at best, they experience limited or slow improvement in their condition or, at worst, receive potentially ineffective or deleterious treatment.

To address the lack of evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of antipsychotic treatment options for this particular population, the investigators have designed a prospective observational study with evaluation in a mirror image design. This reduces confounders at the level of a randomized controlled trial, allowing for robust statistical analysis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • Canton of Zurich
      • Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, 8032
        • Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The Center for Inpatient Forensic Therapy (ZSFT: Zentrum für Stationäre ForensischeTherapie [German]), which is part of the Clinic for Forensic Psychiatry of the Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Zurich is Switzerland's largest forensic psychiatric clinic specializing in the treatment of imprisoned patients suffering from psychiatric disorders.

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants are competent to give informed consent.
  • Participants are between 18 and 65 years of age.
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia DSM-5
  • Violent crime in the course of a psychotic episode.
  • German language proficiency

Exclusion criteria

  • Low intelligence
  • Current neurological disorder
  • Substance induced psychotic disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychopathology
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a semi-structured interview designed to meas-ure the severity of psychopathology in patients with a psychotic disorder. The scale ranges from 30 to 210; higher scores mean greater psychopathology. Change from baseline in psychopathology on the PANSS.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aggression
Time Frame: 12 Months
The Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) is a four-part behavior rating scale used to evaluate and document the frequency and severity of aggressive episodes. It ranges 0 to 100: higher scores mean more severe aggression. Aggression and aggressive behavior as assessed by the MOAS.
12 Months
Craving
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Yale Craving Scale (YCS) is a psychometric scale for assessing smoking and drinking urges. Total scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater dependence. Change from baseline in craving on the YCS.
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Psychiatric University Hospital, Zurich

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Stephan T. Egger, MD, PhD, University of Zurich

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 1, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AiW-TlG

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Antipsychotic

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings