Preoperative Imatinib Mesylate Combined With Rectal-sparing Surgery in Patients With c-KIT Gene-mutant Rectal GIST (PIRKER)

July 23, 2023 updated by: 蒋伟忠, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Preoperative Imatinib Mesylate Combined With Rectal-sparing Surgery in Patients With c-KIT Gene-mutant Rectal GIST: an Open-label, Single-arm, Phase III Trial（PIRKER）

Prior to the implementation of preoperative imatinib mesylate therapy, a considerable percentage (ranging from 34.5% to 67.5%) of individuals diagnosed with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR), a surgical procedure that involved the removal of the anus and necessitated a permanent colostomy.

This study aims to investigate the safety and viability of an organ-preserving approach involving preoperative imatinib mesylate treatment in conjunction with local resection for rectal GIST, specifically targeting patients with c-KIT gene mutations.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Prior to the implementation of preoperative imatinib mesylate therapy, a considerable percentage (ranging from 34.5% to 67.5%) of individuals diagnosed with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR), a surgical procedure that involved the removal of the anus and necessitated a permanent colostomy.

Previous studies have established that preoperative administration of imatinib mesylate effectively diminishes the size of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and enhances the likelihood of sphincter preservation. After initiating preoperative imatinib mesylate treatment, the sphincter preservation rate has notably escalated from 4.2% to 33.0%-94.9%.

In theory, lymph node resection is not required for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST); the local excision of rectal GIST enables sphincter preservation and yields satisfactory anal function and quality of life (QoL). Various surgical techniques are utilized for local excision, including traditional transanal (TA) and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) approaches.

This study aims to explore the safety and feasibility of an organ-preservation strategy of preoperative imatinib mesylate combined with local resection in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), specifically for patients with c-KIT gene mutations.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
23

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350001
        • Weizhong Jiang

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Over the age of 18.
  2. Newly pathology-diagnosed rectal GIST
  3. Tumor > 2cm; local resection of R0 is not possible in the initial evaluation.
  4. The lower margin of the tumor is ≤ 5cm from the anal verge.
  5. C-KIT gene mutation.
  6. Male or non-pregnant female.
  7. ECOG score 0-2.
  8. Did not receive targeted therapy before the start of the clinical trial.

  9. Sufficient organ functions are defined as follows:

    Total bilirubin < 1.5×ULN (upper limit of normal, ULN), serum AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) < 2. 5 × ULN, creatinine < 1.5×ULN, neutrophil count > 1. 5 ×109 / L, platelet > 100 × 109 / L.

  10. The patient's informed consent has been obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pathology is non-rectal GIST.
  2. Under the age of 18.
  3. Patients with distant metastasis.
  4. The patient is not permitted to have additional primary malignant tumors within five years unless those tumors are currently deemed clinically insignificant and do not necessitate active intervention, such as basal cell skin cancer or cervical cancer in situ. The presence of any other malignant diseases is strictly prohibited.
  5. Individuals diagnosed with stage III or IV cardiac conditions, specifically congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction occurring within six months prior to the commencement of the study.
  6. The patient presents with severe and/or uncontrolled medical ailments, such as unmanaged diabetes, advanced chronic kidney disease, or active uncontrolled infection.
  7. Co-administration of imatinib with warfarin or acetaminophen is contraindicated, necessitating the substitution of alternative medications (e.g., low molecular weight heparin in place of warfarin).
  8. Subjects undergoing radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or targeted therapy.
  9. Pregnant or lactating female patients.
  10. Cognitive or psychiatric disorders.
  11. Profound cardiac, hepatic, and renal dysfunction.
  12. Non-adherence by the patient or the researchers' assessment of the patient's inability to complete the entire trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Preoperative Imatinib + local excision

Following the attainment of the maximum treatment response through imatinib mesylate administration, typically occurring within 6-12 months, as evidenced by two consecutive imaging evaluations, the tumor exhibited no further reduction in size, thus necessitating the selection of surgical intervention.

According to the characteristics of the location of the tumor, the surgeon decides the surgical approach based on the existing literature and the availability of surgical equipment, including:

  1. Local transanal resection (TA)
  2. Local resection transsacralapproach
  3. Local resection via perineal approach
  4. Local resection transvaginal approach
Drug: Imatinib Mesylate
  1. For patients with c-KIT exon 11 mutation, imatinib mesylate, 400mg, qd.
  2. For patients with c-KIT exon 9 mutation, imatinib mesylate, 600mg or 800mg, qd.
Other Names:
  • Gleevec
Procedure: Local resection

According to the characteristics of the location of the tumor, the surgeon decides the surgical approach based on the existing literature and the availability of surgical equipment, including:

  1. Local transanal resection (TA)
  2. Local resection transsacralapproach
  3. Local resection via perineal approach
  4. Local resection transvaginal approach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Organ preservation
Time Frame: 18 months
Rectum intact, owing to no total mesorectal excision (TME), no locoregional regrowth unless amenable to limited, curative (R0) salvage surgery by local excision (LE) and no permanent stoma (including a never reversed protective stoma, or a stoma owing to toxicities and/or poor functional outcomes)
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-year disease-free survival
Time Frame: 36 months
The proportion of participants who remain disease-free at 3 years after surgery
36 months
Local recurrence rate
Time Frame: 36 months
The local recurrence rate is defined as the incidence detection of a tumor involving the bowel wall only that occurs after LE or TME
36 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: 36 months
The proportion of participants who remain survival at 3 years after surgery
36 months
R0 resection rate
Time Frame: 18 months
The R0 resection rate is defined as the rate of R0 resection
18 months
Quality of life based on EORTC-QLQs-C30 and EORTC-QLQs-CR29
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after surgery
Quality of life accessed by EORTC-QLQs-C30 and EORTC-QLQs-CR29 questionnaire
Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after surgery
Anorectal function
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after surgery
Anorectal function based on LARS score
Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Weizhong Jiang, MD, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2023XHYG0025-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of Rectum

Clinical Trials on Imatinib Mesylate

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings