Mesenteric Vascular Preconditioning Combined With Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Submucosal Tumor at the Gastroesophageal Junction (SAVE-GEJ)

April 26, 2026 updated by: Zhang Liming, Peking University People's Hospital

Single-center Prospective Clinical Study on the Application of Mesenteric Vascular Preconditioning Combined With Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Submucosal Tumor at the Gastroesophageal Junction (SAVE-GEJ Trial)

This study is a single-center, prospective, single-arm, exploratory clinical study (phase II exploratory trial). No parallel control group was established in the study, and all subjects who met the inclusion criteria underwent a uniform surgical treatment approach, namely, double-scope combined resection with mesenteric vascular preconditioning. The study aims to preliminarily evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this novel surgical strategy for the treatment of submucosal tumor at the gastroesophageal junction, and to provide data support for subsequent larger-scale controlled studies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study follows the PICO principle design, as detailed below:

Target population: Patients aged 18-80 years with gastroesophageal junction submucosal tumor, diagnosed by endoscopy, CT, and/or endoscopic ultrasonography, with a tumor diameter of 1-5cm and an upper margin ≤2cm from the esophageal dentate line, who plan to undergo surgical treatment.

Surgical approach: Pre-treatment of mesenteric vessels with combined resection using both endoscopes. Based on the distance between the upper edge of the tumor and the dentate line, the tumor is classified and the corresponding surgical procedure is adopted: Type I (involving the dentate line or lower esophagus): Pre-treatment of mesenteric vessels + Submucosal Endoscopic Tunneling Resection (STER) + laparoscopic reinforcement; Type II (≤1cm from the dentate line): Pre-treatment of mesenteric vessels + Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) or STER surgery or Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection (EFTR) + laparoscopic reinforcement; Type III (1-2cm from the dentate line): Pre-treatment of mesenteric vessels + EFTR surgery + laparoscopic reinforcement. The distance between the tumor and the dentate line is measured endoscopically with the subject in a supine position under moderate insufflation during gastroscopy.

Clinical outcome:

Primary outcome: Evaluate the safety of this surgical protocol. The primary evaluation indicators are: conversion to open surgery rate, total operation time, number of endoscopic hemostasis attempts during the operation, hemostasis time, incidence of perioperative complications (such as bleeding, anastomotic leakage, gastroparesis, etc.), and changes in postoperative inflammatory markers in patients.

Secondary outcomes: Evaluate the oncological efficacy of the surgical regimen, including 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Assess the impact of the surgical regimen on patients' postoperative gastric function and quality of life, through comprehensive evaluation using upper gastrointestinal imaging, gastric function scores (such as STO22), quality of life scales (EORTC QLQ-C30), and nutritional indicators. Explore the factors related to surgical success and patient prognosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100044
        • Peking University People' Hosptial

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 to 80 (inclusive), of either gender.
  • Preoperative gastroscopy, enhanced CT, and/or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) examinations led to a clinical diagnosis of submucosal tumor (SMT) at the gastroesophageal junction.
  • The maximum diameter of SMT is 1~5 cm (based on radiological measurements).
  • The distance from the upper margin of the SMT to the dentate line of the esophagogastric junction is ≤2 cm.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) physical status score of 0 or 1.
  • Plan to undergo laparoscopic surgery, and the researcher judges that the patient is suitable for the combined surgical procedure involved in this study.
  • Volunteer to participate in this study and sign a written informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • SMT that meets the absolute indications for endoscopic treatment alone (such as lesions with a diameter of <1cm that can be completely resected endoscopically).
  • Patients with severe systemic diseases such as heart, lung, liver, and kidney dysfunction, who are unable to tolerate surgery or anesthesia after evaluation.
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Previous history of upper abdominal surgery.
  • Previously received upper abdominal radiotherapy.
  • Have suffered from or currently suffer from other malignant tumors within the past 5 years.
  • Lesions accompanied by clear ulcers, metastasis, or lesions after neoadjuvant and conversion therapy.
  • The researcher determines that there are any other situations that make the participant unsuitable for participating in this study (such as mental disorders, poor adherence, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SAVE-GEJ
The mesenteric preconditioning technique is employed in combination with Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection (STER), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or traditional laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery(LECS), supplemented by laparoscopic reinforcement suturing
The mesenteric preconditioning technique is employed in combination with Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection (STER), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or traditional laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery(LECS), supplemented by laparoscopic reinforcement suturing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of endoscopic hemostasis procedures
Time Frame: The day of surgery
The number of times endoscopic hemostasis (including having to interrupt the surgery to use electrocoagulation and hemostatic clips alone for hemostasis) was required due to submucosal or wound bleeding during the operation
The day of surgery
Endoscopic hemostasis time
Time Frame: The day of surgery (in minutes),up to 1440minutes (24hours)
Total duration (in minutes) for endoscopic hemostasis during the procedure
The day of surgery (in minutes),up to 1440minutes (24hours)
Perioperative complication rate
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
Based on the Clavien-Dindo classification system, complications occurring within 30 days after surgery, including anastomotic leakage, postoperative bleeding, delayed gastric emptying, abdominal infection, and esophagogastric anastomotic stenosis, are recorded, and their severity is assessed
Within 30 days after surgery
Postoperative peripheral white blood cell count
Time Frame: On the first and third days after surgery.
Blood tests for inflammation indicator, including peripheral white blood cell count, conducted on the first and third days after surgery.
On the first and third days after surgery.
Adverse Events (AE)
Time Frame: within 30 days after surgery
Record all adverse events that occur from the time of signing the informed consent form to within 30 days after surgery, grade them according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 5.0) of the National Cancer Institute, and assess their correlation with the patient's surgery.
within 30 days after surgery
Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time Frame: within 30 days after surgery
Any event that leads to death, endangers life, requires hospitalization or prolongs hospitalization, or results in permanent or severe disability or loss of function must be reported to the ethics committee and relevant hospital authorities within 24 hours of being notified.
within 30 days after surgery
Conversion to open surgery rate
Time Frame: During surgery
It is defined as the proportion of cases that are converted to open surgery due to operational difficulties during the procedure, preventing the continuation of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery.
During surgery
Total operation time
Time Frame: During surgery
The total duration (in minutes) from the commencement of laparoscopic incision to the completion of suturing all incisions
During surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
5-year disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 5 year after surgery
The time (in months) from the date of surgery to the first occurrence of tumor recurrence, metastasis, or death from any cause. If none of these events occurs, the duration is censored at the last follow-up date.
5 year after surgery
5-year overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 5 year after surgery
The time from the date of surgery to death from any cause (in months), or censored at the last follow-up date if death does not occur.
5 year after surgery
Time to first liquid intake after surgery
Time Frame: 30days after surgery
The time interval (in days) from the end of surgery to the first intake of liquid food after surgery.
30days after surgery
Postoperative hospitalization days
Time Frame: From date of completion of surgery until the date of discharge,assessed up to 3 months(in days)
The time interval (in days) from the completion of surgery to the patient's discharge
From date of completion of surgery until the date of discharge,assessed up to 3 months(in days)
Total hospitalization cost (yuan)
Time Frame: 30day after surgery
The total amount of all expenses incurred by the inpatient (yuan)
30day after surgery
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events assessed by upper gastrointestinal series
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
One year after surgery, an upper gastrointestinal series is performed to assess number of participants with treatment-related adverse events,including gastroesophageal reflux, delayed gastric emptying, or abnormal anastomotic morphology
1 year after surgery
R0 resection rate
Time Frame: During surgery
The proportion of cases where postoperative pathological examination confirms negative tumor margins under the microscope and there is no intraoperative tumor rupture.
During surgery
Quality of life assessment(European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30)
Time Frame: 5 years after surgery
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used for assessment, which was conducted before surgery, and at 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery.Score Range: 0 to 100 for all scales.Functional & Global Health Status Scales: Higher scores = Better Outcome. A high score indicates better functioning and overall quality of life.Symptom & Single-Item Scales: Higher scores = Worse Outcome. A high score indicates a higher level of symptoms or problems
5 years after surgery
Gastric function-specific score(European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Stomach Cancer 22-item module )
Time Frame: 5 years after surgery.

Assessed using the gastric cancer-specific module (EORTC QLQ-STO22) before surgery, and at 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery.

Score Range: Like the QLQ-C30, each scale's raw scores are linearly transformed to a standardized range of 0 to 100 for analysis and comparison.

Scoring Direction: The meaning of a "higher score" depends on the specific subscale.

Symptom Scales and Single-Item Measures (e.g., Dysphagia, Pain, Reflux, Eating Restrictions): A higher score = worse outcome. A high score indicates a higher symptom burden or more severe problem.

Functional Scales: A higher score = better outcome (e.g., better physical function). The STO22 module consists entirely of symptom-related scales and single items, and all are scored higher = worse outcome.

5 years after surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)

Clinical Trials on laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery

Subscribe