Non-Expert Acquisition & Remote Expert Review of Screening Echocardiography Images From Child Health & AnteNatal Clinics (NEARER SCAN)

March 15, 2024 updated by: Joshua Francis, Menzies School of Health Research

Non-Expert Acquisition and Remote Expert Review of Screening Echocardiography Images From Child Health and AnteNatal Clinics (NEARER SCAN)

The Non-Expert Acquisition and Remote Expert Review of Screening echocardiography images from Child health and AnteNatal clinics (NEARER SCAN) study is a co-designed, implementation research project that will improve equitable access to culturally safe, best quality care for Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) in high-burden Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in Australia, and in Timor-Leste. The research addresses an area of unmet need, using novel technologies and embedding them in health practice, to enhance and accelerate diagnosis of RHD outside acute health settings and improve outcomes. The study will be conducted in partnership with community leaders and local partners.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study titled 'Non-Expert Acquisition and Remote Expert Review of Screening echocardiography images from Child health and AnteNatal clinics' (NEARER SCAN; "LENO BESIK" in Tetum) aims to co-design, implement and evaluate a task-sharing approach to echocardiographic screening for early detection and management of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in high-risk settings in Australia and Timor-Leste.

Specific objectives include:

  1. To co-design implementation strategies with communities underpinned by local program theories.
  2. To implement SPLASH echocardiography training and a task-sharing approach to echocardiographic screening for early detection and management of RHD in communities, based on co-designed implementation strategies.
  3. To conduct a realist evaluation to understand what implementation strategies assist in integrating this intervention into routine health service delivery and why.
  4. To determine the clinical effectiveness of the intervention in terms of impact on key clinical outcome measures.
  5. To conduct cost-of-illness, cost-effectiveness and budget-impact analyses of the task-sharing approach to echocardiographic screening for early detection and management of RHD in Australia and Timor-Leste.

Local primary health clinic staff will be trained to perform focused echocardiography using hand-carried ultrasound (HCU) devices employing the 'Single Parasternal Long Axis view with a Sweep of the Heart' (SPLASH) technique. The acquired images will be interpreted by experts (cardiologists and cardiac sonographers) remotely from the site of acquisition. Approximately 1500 children and pregnant women will be screened across high-risk communities in Australia and Timor Leste, over an 18 month period.

A mixed-methods effectiveness-implementation study design will be used to evaluate the implementation of an intervention designed to achieve early detection and management of RHD in high-risk populations. An implementation strategy will be co-designed at each site with the local community and participating primary healthcare (PHC) service, incorporating non-adaptable elements of the intervention, and mapped onto a Theory of Change framework. Co-design, implementation and evaluation will occur simultaneously, and a Type 2 hybrid design study will be used to evaluate both the implementation strategies and the clinical effectiveness of the intervention. The clinical effectiveness will be assessed as the change in the proportion of the at-risk population that received secondary prophylaxis by the end of the study compared to baseline. Program implementation will be evaluated with a realist evaluation to explain under what circumstances the program is successfully integrated into routine service delivery. Data informing evaluation will include numbers of normal, abnormal, and uninterpretable SPLASH echocardiograms obtained, numbers of participants progressing through the cascade of care, augmented by qualitative data from interviews conducted with staff and participants, and costs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1500

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria in Australia:

  • Any child between the age of 5 - 20 years old living in the participating community
  • Pregnant women at high risk for RHD undergoing antenatal appointments or a hospital admission will be invited to participate. High risk for RHD will be defined as being from an area where RHD all-age prevalence is >1/1000 RHD or acute rheumatic fever incidence >30/100,000 per year in 5-14-year-olds. For practical purposes, this means Aboriginal women living in urban, rural or remote communities in northern Australia, or immigrants from high-risk settings.

Inclusion criteria for Timor-Leste:

  • Any child between the age of 5-20 years old and any pregnant woman.

Exclusion criteria for Australia and Timor-Leste:

  • Women who are unable to consent due to physical, mental, or intellectual disability will be excluded. Women and children with known existing cardiac disease will NOT be excluded since evaluation of severity and change in severity during pregnancy will be tracked, and data will inform the calculation of prevalence.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention
Participant receiving echocardiography screening.
Diagnostic test: SPLASH echocardiography screening
Screening echocardiogram performed by a briefly trained health worker with images reviewed off site by an expert cardiologist or cardiac sonographer to determine screening outcome. Screening outcome may include: screen positive, screen negative or uninterpretable images.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in proportion receiving secondary antibiotic prophylaxis
Time Frame: 18 months from commencement of study
The change in proportion of the at-risk population receiving secondary antibiotic prophylaxis at the end of the study as compared to baseline
18 months from commencement of study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Full echocardiogram following screening echocardiogram
Time Frame: 3 months from screening echocardiogram
Proportion of people with an abnormal or uninterpretable screening echocardiogram who get a full diagnostic echocardiogram within 3 months and receive a diagnosis.
3 months from screening echocardiogram
Proportion of people diagnosed with RHD who are retained in care
Time Frame: 18 months from commencement of study
Proportion of people diagnosed during study period with RHD who receive guideline-based care by local health service
18 months from commencement of study
Secondary antibiotic prophylaxis prescription and adherence
Time Frame: 12 months from time of diagnosis or at end of the study (which ever is longer).
Proportion of people prescribed secondary prophylaxis who are achieving >= 80% adherence in a 12 months period from time of diagnosis or the end of the study, whichever is longer.
12 months from time of diagnosis or at end of the study (which ever is longer).
Maternal morbidity and mortality outcomes
Time Frame: Within 6 weeks of the individual's post-partum period
Description of maternal morbidity and mortality in pregnant women diagnosed with RHD on echocardiographic screening. This will be reported in absolute numbers and percentage of study population. Morbidity will include cardiac complications (heart failure, arrhythmia, aborted sudden cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction), need for obstetric intervention including emergency cesarean section, intensive care admission, other obstetric complications.
Within 6 weeks of the individual's post-partum period
Prevalence of rheumatic heart disease within the screened population
Time Frame: 18 months from commencement of study
Prevalence of RHD in screened population based on echocardiographic diagnosis
18 months from commencement of study
Rheumatic valvular heart disease severity (mild, moderate or severe) within the screening population based on echocardiographic diagnosis
Time Frame: 18 months from commencement of study
Description of severity of RHD in screened population. This will include proportions of mild, moderate and severe valve disease.
18 months from commencement of study
Neonatal morbidity and mortality outcomes
Time Frame: Within 6 weeks post-partum
Description of neonatal morbidity and mortality outcomes for the pregnant women diagnosed with RHD. This will be reported as absolute numbers and percentage of study population. Morbidity will include need for admission to neonatal intensive care.
Within 6 weeks post-partum

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Menzies School of Health Research

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Telethon Kids Institute
The University of Western Australia
Northern Territory Government of Australia
Western Australian Country Health Service
Timor-Leste Ministry of Health
Miwatj Health Aboriginal Corporation
Mala'la Health Service Aboriginal Corporation
Pilbara Aboriginal Health Alliance

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Joshua R Francis, MBBS, Menzies School of Health Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 15, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • APP2015869

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatic Heart Disease

Clinical Trials on SPLASH echocardiography screening

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings