Serratus Intercostal Block Versus Epidural/Port Infiltration Analgesia in Eventration: Prospective Non Inferiority Study (Analgesic Stra)

June 3, 2026 updated by: Judith Andres, Hospital del Rio Hortega

ANALGESIC STRATEGIES FOR ABDOMINAL WALL REPAIR: A RANDOMISED NON INFERIORITY TRIAL OF SIPB, EPIDURAL ANALGESIA, AND PORT INFILTRATION

Adequate pain control, rehabilitation and early postoperative recovery are currently the model to follow according to the recommended guidelines.In this project the main objective is to evaluate 2 different analgesic strategies, open and laparoscopic surgeries, both intraoperatively and postoperatively, one based on 1. Epidural analgesia and the other 2. Echoguided serratus intercostal block prior to surgical intervention in eventration or abdominal wall repair interventions. or 3 port infiltration and 4 SIPB in laparoscopy We conducted an prospective non inferiority study with a low level of intervention. Epidural analgesia prior to general anesthesia and serratus-intercostal block prior to general anesthesia) following the criteria applied in each case according to the operating room anesthesiologist until reaching the sample size and fulfilling the criteria of: abdominal eventration repair, over 18 years of age, ASA I-III. Signature of the IC. in laparoscopic surgery both techiques are applied after induction of general anaesthesia

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Adequate pain control, rehabilitation and early postoperative recovery are currently model to follow according to the recommended guidelines.In this project the main objective is to evaluate 2 different analgesic strategies both intraoperatively and postoperatively, one based on 1. Epidural analgesia and the other 2. Echoguided serratus intercostal block prior to surgical intervention in eventration or abdominal wall repair interventions. or 3 port infiltration and 4 SIPB in laparoscopy The investigators conducted an non inferiority study with a low level of intervention. Epidural analgesia , serratus-intercostal block and port infiltration prior to general anesthesia) following the criteria applied in each case according to the operating room anesthesiologist until reaching the sample size and fulfilling the criteria of: abdominal eventration repair, over 18 years of age, ASA I-III. Signature of the IC.

We will assess the analgesia provided by the techniques in both techniques and to compare the results.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Castille and León
      • Valladolid, Castille and León, Spain, 47008
        • Judith Andres

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Study Population

people undergoing to repair abdominal wall

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • abdominal eventration repair,
  • over 18 years old,
  • ASA I-III.
  • Signature of the IC.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to Local anesthetic

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Patient under serratus intercostal plane block
patients who will undergo a modified bilateral ultrasound-guided BRILMA block (SIPB) using a high-frequency linear probe (6-15 Hz) and 80 mm needle.
regional anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Eventroplasty
ultrasound guided
Other Names:
  • Regional anesthesia
local anesthetic
Other Names:
  • Regional anesthesia
Active Comparator: patient under epidural analgesia
patients who undergo Epidural Analgesia prior to General Anesthesia and fentanyl 1 mcg/kg approx according to characteristics and needs and upon arrival at the URPA is connected to the PC Levobupi 0.125% at 6 ml / h + rescue boluses of Levobupi 0.125% 4 ml if needed in the 1st hours.
regional anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Eventroplasty
local anesthetic
Other Names:
  • Regional anesthesia
Active Comparator: port infiltration
patients in the port infiltration group underwent local anaesthetic infiltration with 0.25% levobupivacaine at trocar sites, with the volume adjusted according to port number and size.
regional anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Eventroplasty
local anesthetic
Other Names:
  • Regional anesthesia
Active Comparator: SIPB
SIPB group, an ultrasound-guided serratus intercostal plane block was performed after induction at the eighth rib level using 20 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine.
regional anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Eventroplasty
ultrasound guided
Other Names:
  • Regional anesthesia
local anesthetic
Other Names:
  • Regional anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative pain management
Time Frame: 24h
Pain control. NRS scale at O,6, 12 and 24 h in postoperative time
24h
postoperative quality of recovery
Time Frame: 24h
Quality of recovery, QoR15 scale, that includes physical and psicological item. That scale will be fill by the patient 24 h after surgery
24h

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: María T Fernandez, MD, Hospital del Rio Hortega

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 16, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

During the first year the preliminary results will be ready and will be present as abstract. Th estimated time to finish the study is 2 years

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Hernia

Clinical Trials on undergo

Search Similar Trials