Tislelizumab Combined With Chemotherapy in First-line Treatment of AGC

September 6, 2023 updated by: Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Retrospective Study of Tislelizumab Combined With Chemotherapy in First-line Treatment of HER2-negative Advanced Gastric Cancer

This is a single-center, retrospective clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with first-line chemotherapy in the treatment of HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study aims to include 60 HER-2 negative advanced gastric cancer patients who received first-line treatment with tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in our hospital from November 1, 2020 to November 1, 2021. Clinicopathological data, blood tests and imaging data of the patients were collected. The primary endpoints evaluated were PFS and OS, and the secondary endpoints were ORR and safety. At the same time, ctDNA and peripheral cytokine status of patients as well as second-generation sequencing of tumor tissues at baseline were collected for the exploration of therapeutic efficacy related biomarkers.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

HER-2 negative, untreated patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with initially unresectable (locally advanced or metastatic) or postoperative recurrence of gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma confirmed by histopathology have not received any anti-tumor treatment for advanced gastric cancer in the past;
  2. Pathological immunohistochemistry or FISH detection of gastric cancer tissue indicates negative Her-2;
  3. Age range from 18 to 70 years old, regardless of gender;
  4. The distance between postoperative recurrence and the end of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy is more than 6 months;
  5. If the patient experiences toxic side effects after receiving new adjuvant/adjuvant treatment, they need to recover from previous treatment toxic side effects to ≤ 1 level; According to the RECIST evaluation criteria, there should be at least one assessable lesion. Expected survival time ≥ 3 months;

7. ECOG score ≤ 2 points; 8. Main organ functions are basically normal, blood count (within 7 days): hemoglobin ≥ 90g/L, white blood cells ≥ 4.0 × 109/L, neutrophils ≥ 2.0 × 109/L, platelet ≥ 100.0 × 109/L. Total bilirubin 1.0 UNL, creatinine 1.0 × UNL, AST/ALT 2.5 UNL. Liver metastasis: ASAT/ALAT 5 UNL; 9. The electrocardiogram/cardiac function tests are basically normal.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Suffering from undifferentiated gastric cancer or squamous cell carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction and other pathological types of malignant tumors;
  2. Have received anti-tumor treatment for gastric adenocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma at the junction of stomach and esophagus that can not be operated on for the first time or recur after operation, including but not limited to chemotherapy, Targeted therapy, immunotherapy, etc. (except for Thymosin and traditional Chinese medicine treatment);
  3. Patients with other primary malignant tumors other than gastric cancer, excluding cured skin Basal-cell carcinoma and cervical Carcinoma in situ;
  4. Patients with simple or combined brain metastasis;
  5. Has experienced gastrointestinal perforation or fistula within 6 months prior to enrollment;
  6. Patients who also suffer from other important organ diseases, including severe heart disease;
  7. Complications such as uncontrollable moderate to massive ascites, active gastrointestinal bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation, gastrointestinal obstruction, etc;
  8. Patients with chronic diseases such as hypertension, hyperglycemia, and COPD that are difficult to control;
  9. Those who require antibiotics for systemic anti infection, active hepatitis, active pulmonary tuberculosis, and other diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
OS
Time Frame: 3 years
Overall Survival
3 years
PFS
Time Frame: 2 years
Progression-free Survival
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DCR
Time Frame: 2 years
Disease Control Rate
2 years
ORR
Time Frame: 2 years
Objective Remission Rate
2 years
DOR
Time Frame: 2 years
Duration of Remission
2 years
Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: 2 years
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lin Yang, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 6, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NCC3221

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings