Caregiver Skills Training: Comparing Clinician Training Methods (CST)
Caregiver Skills Training: Comparing the Effectiveness of Training Clinicians Via Telehealth and In-Person Training
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Benjamin Handen
- Phone Number: 14122355452
- Email: handenbl@upmc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Charmaine Stillano
- Phone Number: 14122255174
- Email: StillanoC@upmc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States, 16601
- UPMC Altoona
-
McKeesport, Pennsylvania, United States, 15132
- UPMC Mon Yough
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Parents who
- Have a child ages 2-9 with a developmental disability and/or autism
- Able to be served by one of the three UPMC sites
- Able to attend 12 sessions. Group sessions are at the clinic site and the individual sessions may be done virtually or in person.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Parent()s does not speak / understand English. Given the nature of this study, we are unable to provide translation services.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Remote staff training
Staff will receive 15 hours of remote training followed by 12 weeks of remote supervision (one hour per week).
|
The investigators are comparing the relative efficacy of CST between a CST group led by clinicians trained and supervised remotely versus a group led by clinicians trained an supervised face-to-face.
|
|
Active Comparator: Face to face staff training
Staff will receive 15 hours of face to face training followed by 12 weeks of face to face supervision (one hour per week).
|
The investigators are comparing the relative efficacy of CST between a CST group led by clinicians trained and supervised remotely versus a group led by clinicians trained an supervised face-to-face.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from week 1 (baseline) to week 12 on the Caregivers Skills and Knowledge Measure
Time Frame: Week 1 (baseline) versus week 12 (final visit)
|
eEvaluates change in caregiver skills and knowledge related to session content as well as caregiver confidence.
There are 28 skills questions (scored on a scale of 1-5) with a score range fomr 28-140 (with higher scores indicating greater skills).
The Confidence scale consists of 9 items (scored 1-5) with scores ranging from 9-45.
Higher scores indicate greater confidence.
|
Week 1 (baseline) versus week 12 (final visit)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from week 1 (baseline) to week 12 on the Parenting Stress Index.
Time Frame: Week 1 (baseline) versus week 12 (final visit)
|
To assess parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, and child challenges.
There are 36 items and 3 subscales (12 items per subscale).
Subscales include Parent Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction, and Difficult Child.
There is also a Total Stress Score.
Each item is scored on a 1-5 scale.
Range for each subscale is 12-60 points; Total Score is 36-180 points.
Scores are converted to percentiles.
Percentiles of 15-80 are "typical stress;" 81-89 are "high stress;" and >89 are "clinically significant stress."
Higher percentiles indicate higher levels of stress.
|
Week 1 (baseline) versus week 12 (final visit)
|
|
Change from week 1 (baseline) to week 12 on the Social Communication Checklist (SCC)
Time Frame: Week 1 (baseline) versus week 12 (final visit)
|
To assess social communication abilities, specifically social engagement (15 items), expressive language form (15 items), expressive language function (15 items), receptive language (8 items) imitation (6 items, and pla (11 items).
Items are scored on a 3-point scale ("usually," = 3 points; "sometimes," = 2 points; or "rarely" = 1 point).
The range for all 70 items is 70-210 points.
The higher the score, the greater the child's abilities.
|
Week 1 (baseline) versus week 12 (final visit)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Benjamin Handen, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ludwig NN, Suskauer SJ, Rodgin S, Chen J, Borda A, Jones K, Lahey S, Slomine BS. Outcome Measurement in Children With a History of Disorders of Consciousness After Severe Brain Injury: Telephone Administration of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition, and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Pediatric Revision. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 Feb 1;24(2):e76-e83. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003121. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
- Holly LE, Fenley AR, Kritikos TK, Merson RA, Abidin RR, Langer DA. Evidence-Base Update for Parenting Stress Measures in Clinical Samples. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Sep-Oct;48(5):685-705. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2019.1639515. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
- Wainer AL, Berger NI, Ingersoll BR. Brief Report: The Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Social Communication Checklist. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Apr;47(4):1231-1238. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-3026-8.
- Sengupta K, Shah H, Ghosh S, Sanghvi D, Mahadik S, Dani A, Deshmukh O, Pacione L, Dixon P, Salomone E; WHO-CST team; Servili C. World Health Organisation-Caregiver Skills Training (WHO-CST) Program: Feasibility of Delivery by Non-Specialist Providers in Real-world Urban Settings in India. J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Apr;53(4):1444-1461. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05367-0. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
- Kasari C, Lawton K, Shih W, Barker TV, Landa R, Lord C, Orlich F, King B, Wetherby A, Senturk D. Caregiver-mediated intervention for low-resourced preschoolers with autism: an RCT. Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e72-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3229.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY23040076
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.