Biomarkers of Reaction To HIIT Exercise (BReaTHE)

March 23, 2026 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

What Makes a Responder, a Responder? Biomarkers to Help Identify Responders and Resistors to High-intensity Interval Training for Lower Extremity Chronic Stroke

Stroke survivors with lower limb disability can improve their walking speed with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) rehabilitation therapy. However, some individuals may not respond to HIIT even when fully adherent to the program. To address this, the investigators propose to build a predictive model that identifies if a Veteran with chronic subcortical stroke will improve their walking speed with HIIT by incorporating blood lactate as an early predictor of exercise response, and inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) as predictors of the brain's potential to respond, while also taking into consideration other factors such as comorbidities, demographics, and fitness levels.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Most chronic subcortical stroke survivors have difficulty walking, but few predictors can help identify if a patient will respond to an exercise regimen and improve their function. To enhance precision rehabilitation for chronic subcortical stroke patients, personalized aerobic exercise interventions are crucial. This requires the development of innovative technologies that can identify the essential neurobiological factors to predict intervention response and enable clinicians to determine individualized rehabilitation targets. Lactate is one exciting new target that acts as a molecular messenger between the periphery and the brain. For lactate to have an impact on other organs, including the brain, there must be a substantial increase in its level in the bloodstream from baseline. When the blood lactate threshold is surpassed during exercise, lactate acts on the brain metabolically via the TCA cycle. Embedded within the TCA cycle is the means to increase or decrease neurotransmitter concentrations such as GABA and glutamate. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the brain's major inhibitory neurotransmitter, is a new treatment target that promotes neural plasticity during stroke rehabilitation. Drawing from the framework of personalized rehabilitation approaches and our preliminary data, the investigators propose to build a predictive model that can identify if a chronic subcortical stroke patient will respond to exercise training. This model aims to predict improvements in walking speed by incorporating blood lactate as an early predictor of exercise response and GABA and cerebral blood flow (CBF) as predictors of the brain's potential to respond, in addition to other influencing factors such as comorbidities, demographics, and fitness levels. The overarching hypothesis is that robust neurophysiological factors driven by lactate can differentiate responders from resistors and that these factors can be applied clinically as biomarkers to predict functional outcomes after a 12-week HIIT intervention. The investigators will assess improvements in walking speed in 48 Veterans with lower limb disability due to chronic subcortical stroke in response to a 36-session (12-week) HIIT intervention. After the intervention, each adherent participant who improves their walking speed to greater than 0.6 m/s will be categorized as a responder while each adherent participant who does not improve their walking speed will be categorized as a resistor. At baseline and after 12 weeks of HIIT the investigators will evaluate walking speed, balance, leg strength, and endurance to identify resistors and responders to HIIT and collect a) GABA from the primary sensory-motor leg area using single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy, b) CBF from the whole brain using pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling MRI and c) VO2 max to evaluate change in CRF. During the intervention, the investigators will collect blood lactate via finger prick during sessions 1, 4, 7, 10, and 28 to assess its potential as an early predictor of exercise response. In aim 1 the investigators determine if surpassing the lactate threshold during the first 4 weeks of HIIT predicts the change in walking speed to 0.6 m/s, from pre- to post-HIIT. If lactate proves to be a robust early marker of functional response to exercise, the investigators will have an easy-to-deploy predictor of who will best benefit from HIIT. In aim 2 the investigators will determine if (a) baseline GABA and/or CBF predict improvements in walking speed from baseline to after HIIT and (b) if a change in GABA and/or CBF relate to a change in walking speed. The investigators aim to establish neurophysiological correlates of improving function with HIIT to better understand the mechanisms. Finally, in aim 3 the investigators will a predictive machine learning algorithm of who will improve their walking speed with HIIT using factors of blood lactate, baseline GABA and CBF, baseline leg weakness and VO2-max, pre-stroke fitness, age, sex, and comorbidities. The overarching objective is to develop a model to predict which Veteran with chronic stroke will respond to a 12-week exercise program.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
55

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Georgia
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033-4004
        • Recruiting
        • Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lisa C Krishnamurthy, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • chronic left or right subcortical stroke as defined by 6 months or more after a cardiovascular accident
  • lower extremity motor impairment due to stroke that causes a walking speed of less than 0.6 m/s during a 10m walk
  • Veteran status

Exclusion Criteria:

  • MRI contraindications, including implanted cardiac pacemakers and severe claustrophobia
  • any neurodegenerative condition other than stroke that may lead to lower extremity impairment
  • a visual or auditory impairment that may hinder study procedures
  • any medical condition that would preclude participation in a physical exercise intervention program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Chronic Stroke with lower limb disability
The investigators will enroll 55 Veterans with chronic subcortical stroke in the 12-week HIIT intervention, with the expectation that 48 participants (85%) will complete the entire program. In our experience, 65% of participants will respond to the HIIT intervention, resulting in an estimated 31 responders and 17 resistors. Each chronic subcortical stroke participant will be asked to participate in the HIIT study protocol. Classification of resistor or responder: A responder to the 12-week HIIT intervention will be defined as a participant who increases their walking speed to greater than 0.6 m/s. A resistor to the intervention will be defined as a participant who does not increase their walking speed to greater than 0.6 m/s.
Other: High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)
HIIT consists of three weekly 25-60 minute cycling sessions for 12 weeks at the Atlanta VA, administered by a trained exercise physiologist, for a total of 36 HIIT sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
10 m walk test on a GAITRite mat
Time Frame: baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
To assess short-distance walking speed and gait characteristics.
baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) test
Time Frame: baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
To assess short-distance walking and postural control.
baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
6-minute walk test
Time Frame: baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
To assess endurance.
baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood lactate change during HIIT session
Time Frame: On exercise day 1, 4, 7, 10, and 28. The total number of exercise days is 36 (3 times per week for 12 weeks).
To assess if the participant increases their blood lactate during the HIIT session.
On exercise day 1, 4, 7, 10, and 28. The total number of exercise days is 36 (3 times per week for 12 weeks).
MEGA-PRESS Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Time Frame: baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
To assess GABA from the ipsilesional and contralesional leg areas of the brain.
baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
pseudo Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling MRI
Time Frame: baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
To assess whole brain regional cerebral blood flow.
baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
Graded treadmill or bike testing
Time Frame: baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
To estimate VO2-max.
baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Repetition max strength test
Time Frame: baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
To assess the leg strength of the affected and less affected leg.
baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ)
Time Frame: baseline (week 1)
To assess pre-stroke fitness levels.
baseline (week 1)
Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire (SCQ)
Time Frame: baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)
To assess the presence and burden of comorbidities.
baseline (week 1) and after the completion of 12 weeks of exercise (week 14)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
VA Office of Research and Development

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Atlanta VA Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lisa C Krishnamurthy, PhD, Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 23, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • N4537-R
  • I01RX004537 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract: RR&D)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Per VA guidelines and regulations, deidentified data will be shared upon written request to the PI.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Upon close of the study.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings