Nursing Students & Positive Birth Perception & Simulation
The Impact of Simulation-Based Education on Positive Birth Perception and Natural Birth Approach
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
İzmir, Turkey, 3500
- Ege Univesity
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The voluntarily agree to participate in the study Not having experience with simulation Being a 4th year nursing undergraduate student not working as a nurse
Exclusion Criteria:
- During the study, participants must complete all forms, attend all theoretical training, and remain in the study until completion.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: hybrid simulation
These students participated in a natural birth approach scenario with a hybrid simulation (n=28).
|
During the hybrid simulation, a student and a standardized patient participated.
The patient wore a wearable pregnancy model.
Before the start of the "Natural Birth Approach Scenario, a pre-briefing session was conducted.
The student's performance during the simulation was recorded on video, and each simulation lasted approximately 30 minutes.
After the simulation, a debriefing session was held with the student, and feedback was given.
Scales were used to evaluate the implementation of the practices.
|
|
Active Comparator: video-modeling group
The students in this group participated in a video modeling education (n=28).
|
The students in the group had the opportunity to learn through an educational video that followed the "Natural Birth Approach Scenario."
Afterward, they put their knowledge into practice and were evaluated using the Birth Approach Clinical Skills Guide.
A feedback session followed the practice session.
Finally, they were assessed using scales to measure their performance.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
students' self-confidence and satisfaction
Time Frame: through simulation practices completion, an average of 5 weeks
|
It is a scale published by the National League for Nurses (NLN) to measure students' attitudes and beliefs about simulation.The highest score that can be obtained from the scale is 65 and the lowest score is 13.
|
through simulation practices completion, an average of 5 weeks
|
|
Natural Birth Approach Questionnaire
Time Frame: change from before implemention and 4th week of after practice
|
The researchers developed a measurement tool to assess students' knowledge, opinions, and approaches to natural birth.
The tool uses a scoring system where correct statements receive one point and incorrect statements receive zero points.
The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points.
|
change from before implemention and 4th week of after practice
|
|
education methods satisfaction
Time Frame: through simulation practices completion, an average of 5 weeks
|
It evaluates the degree of contentment of the student with the teaching methodology implemented.In evaluating the satisfaction with training methods, students are scored from 20 to 80.
|
through simulation practices completion, an average of 5 weeks
|
|
Natural Birth Approach Skills
Time Frame: through simulation practices completion, an average of 5 weeks
|
The researchers developed a checklist to assess skills.
Each item was evaluated on a 3-point scale indicating inadequacy, partial sufficiency, or sufficiency.
The checklist consists of 21 items.
The total score ranges from 21 to 63 points.
|
through simulation practices completion, an average of 5 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: sümeyye bakır, master, Ege University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dunbar-Reid K, Sinclair PM, Hudson D. Advancing renal education: hybrid simulation, using simulated patients to enhance realism in haemodialysis education. J Ren Care. 2015 Jun;41(2):134-9. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12112. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
- Bakke E, Oseth EH, Fofanah T, Sesay I, van Duinen A, Bolkan HA, Westendorp J, Lonnee-Hoffmann R. Vacuum births and barriers to its use: An observational study in governmental hospitals in Sierra Leone. BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 22;12(11):e060773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060773.
- Duff J, Kardong-Edgren S, Chang TP, Elkin RL, Ramachandra G, Stapleton S, Palaganas JC, Kou M, Gross IT. Closing the gap: a call for a common blueprint for remote distance telesimulation. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021 Apr 12;7(4):185-187. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000875. eCollection 2021.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- E.1161
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.