Surgical Resection Combined With Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy

January 30, 2024 updated by: Zhujiang Hospital

A Retrospective Study of Surgical Resection Combined With Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Patients with ruptured liver cancer and bleeding after surgical resection were included according to the criteria of admission, and the patients were divided into experimental and control groups. the primary efficacy end point was RFS, and the secondary end point was the rate of abdominal implant metastases and OS.To analyze the efficacy of HIPEC.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with ruptured liver cancer and bleeding after surgical resection were included according to the criteria of admission, and the patients were divided into groups: experimental group: surgical resection combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy, and control group: simple surgical resection.

At further follow-up, the primary efficacy end point was time to Recurrence free survival (RFS) ,the time from the patient's treatment until the discovery of abdominal metastases or until the follow-up period, and the secondary end point was the rate of abdominal implant metastases, that is, according to the postoperative follow-up test and imaging findings, the incidence of abdominal implantation and metastasis, until the end of abdominal recurrence or metastasis or observation period. Overall Survival OS and survival rate: the time from the time the patient underwent partial hepatectomy until death from tumor causes or the end of the observation period. To analyze the efficacy of HIPEC.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Mingxin Pan, Prof.
  • Phone Number: 189289 18928918216
  • Email: pmxwxy@sohu.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

From February 2017 to February 2023, patients with ruptured Southern Medical University of hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosed in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Pearl River Hospital or other hospitals.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. according to the clinical diagnostic criteria of primary liver cancer (2022 edition) or confirmed by pathology/cytology;
  2. preoperative diagnosis of rupture and hemorrhage of liver cancer by clinical manifestation, examination and imaging;
  3. Age 18-80 years;
  4. Child-pugh class A or class B after liver protection and albumin correction, without severe heart, lung or renal dysfunction, without absolute contraindication to surgery;
  5. ECOG-PS score of 0-1;
  6. without other neoplastic diseases;
  7. Sign and perfect the informed consent form before operation;
  8. without postoperative liver failure, without major complications such as massive hemorrhage, purulent infection and multiple organ failure, and without discharge from hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. having other active malignant tumor;
  2. the expected survival time is less than 3 months;
  3. Child-pugh class C, complicated with severe organic disease of important organs, complicated with severe cirrhosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Surgical resection combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy
Procedure: intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy

（1）Partial hepatectomy: The reasonable resection method was selected according to the tumor location, residual liver volume and the operation process. The tumor margin should be more than 1 cm, the abdominal cavity was flushed with sterile warm distilled water. In the control group,1-2 abdominal drainage tubes were placed on the hepatic cross-section, in the exposed group,4 abdominal perfusion tubes were placed in the right hepatic apex, splenic fossa, left and right pelvic cavity to perform HIPEC postoperatively.

(2) HIPEC: Temperature setting:43 °C perfusion time:60 min, perfusion speed:400-600 mL/min ,perfusion volume:3000 mL.

（3）Hepatic artery embolization：Through the common femoral artery, the catheter passed through the abdominal aorta, celiac trunk, the common hepatic artery and the inherent hepatic artery to the blood supply target artery of liver cancer. The embolic agent Lipiodol was mixed and injected to embolize the bleeding artery to stop bleeding.

Other Names:
  • simple surgical resection
  • Hepatic artery embolization
simple surgical resection
Control group: simple surgical resection
Procedure: intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy

（1）Partial hepatectomy: The reasonable resection method was selected according to the tumor location, residual liver volume and the operation process. The tumor margin should be more than 1 cm, the abdominal cavity was flushed with sterile warm distilled water. In the control group,1-2 abdominal drainage tubes were placed on the hepatic cross-section, in the exposed group,4 abdominal perfusion tubes were placed in the right hepatic apex, splenic fossa, left and right pelvic cavity to perform HIPEC postoperatively.

(2) HIPEC: Temperature setting:43 °C perfusion time:60 min, perfusion speed:400-600 mL/min ,perfusion volume:3000 mL.

（3）Hepatic artery embolization：Through the common femoral artery, the catheter passed through the abdominal aorta, celiac trunk, the common hepatic artery and the inherent hepatic artery to the blood supply target artery of liver cancer. The embolic agent Lipiodol was mixed and injected to embolize the bleeding artery to stop bleeding.

Other Names:
  • simple surgical resection
  • Hepatic artery embolization
other
imple interventional hemostasis group
Procedure: intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy

（1）Partial hepatectomy: The reasonable resection method was selected according to the tumor location, residual liver volume and the operation process. The tumor margin should be more than 1 cm, the abdominal cavity was flushed with sterile warm distilled water. In the control group,1-2 abdominal drainage tubes were placed on the hepatic cross-section, in the exposed group,4 abdominal perfusion tubes were placed in the right hepatic apex, splenic fossa, left and right pelvic cavity to perform HIPEC postoperatively.

(2) HIPEC: Temperature setting:43 °C perfusion time:60 min, perfusion speed:400-600 mL/min ,perfusion volume:3000 mL.

（3）Hepatic artery embolization：Through the common femoral artery, the catheter passed through the abdominal aorta, celiac trunk, the common hepatic artery and the inherent hepatic artery to the blood supply target artery of liver cancer. The embolic agent Lipiodol was mixed and injected to embolize the bleeding artery to stop bleeding.

Other Names:
  • simple surgical resection
  • Hepatic artery embolization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intra-abdominal recurrence-free survival (RFS)
Time Frame: the time from surgical resection in patients with HCC until the detection of intra-abdominal recurrence or metastasis or the end of the observation period(2 years)
Intra-abdominal recurrence-free survival (RFS):the time from surgical resection patients with HCC until the detection of intra-abdominal recurrence or metastasis or the end of the observation period, based on postoperative follow-up test criteria and imaging findings(2 years)
the time from surgical resection in patients with HCC until the detection of intra-abdominal recurrence or metastasis or the end of the observation period(2 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: time from partial hepatectomy for HCC until death from any cause or end of observation period(2 years)
Overall Survival (OS): time from partial hepatectomy for HCC until death from any cause or end of observation period(2 years)
time from partial hepatectomy for HCC until death from any cause or end of observation period(2 years)
survival rate
Time Frame: time from partial hepatectomy for HCC until death from any cause or end of observation period
defined as 1-month,3-month,6-month, 1-year,2-year survival rate
time from partial hepatectomy for HCC until death from any cause or end of observation period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Zhujiang Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mingxin Pan, Prof., Southern Medical University, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 25, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 30, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 30, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2023-KY-078-02

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings