Lenvatinib Plus DEB-TACE With/Without FOLFOX-HAIC for Large HCC With PVTT

February 10, 2024 updated by: Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Lenvatinib Plus Drug-eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Lenvatinib Plus Drug-eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

This multicenter retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients with large HCC and PVTT who received lenvatinib plus DEB-TACE with/without FOLFOX-HAIC between July 2019 and June 2021. Tumor response, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared between the two groups.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Consecutive patients with large HCC and PVTT treated with lenvatinib plus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin (Len+DEB-TACE+HAIC) or lenvatinib plus DEB-TACE (Len+DEB-TACE) from July 2019 to June 2021 were screened. Tumor response was evaluated according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Clinical outcomes, including tumor response, TTP, OS, and TRAEs were compared between the two groups.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
205

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510260
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with large HCC and PVTT.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a confirmed diagnosis of HCC
  • the largest intrahepatic lesion >7 cm
  • presence of major PVTT on imaging
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1
  • Child-Pugh class A/B
  • adequate hematologic and organ function, with leukocyte count 3.0 109/L, neutrophil count 1.5 109/L, platelet count 75 109/L, hemoglobin 85 g/L, alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase 5 upper limit of the normal, creatinine clearance rate 1.5 upper limit of the normal, and prothrombin time prolongation <4 s

Exclusion Criteria:

  • incomplete medical records
  • central nervous system involvement
  • previous treatment with transarterial embolization, TACE, HAIC, radiotherapy, or systemic therapy
  • history of malignancies other than HCC
  • history of organ transplantation
  • severe cardiac, pulmonary or renal dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Len+DEB-TACE+HAIC
Patients were treated with Len+DEB-TACE+HAIC.
Procedure: Len+DEB-TACE+HAIC
Patients received TACE with drug-eluting beads and FOLFOX-HAIC. DEB-TACE and/or HAIC was repeated for viable tumors demonstrated by follow-up imaging in patients without worsening liver function or contraindications. Lenvatinib was orally administered at a dose of 12 mg/day (bodyweight 60 kg) or 8mg/day (bodyweight <60 kg). It was initiated within 7 days after the first DEB-TACE or DEB-TACE+HAIC and continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred.
Len+DEB-TACE
Patients were treated with Len+DEB-TACE.
Procedure: Len+DEB-TACE
Patients received TACE with drug-eluting beads. DEB-TACE was repeated for viable tumors demonstrated by follow-up imaging in patients without worsening liver function or contraindications. Lenvatinib was orally administered at a dose of 12 mg/day (bodyweight 60 kg) or 8mg/day (bodyweight <60 kg). It was initiated within 7 days after the first DEB-TACE or DEB-TACE+HAIC and continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to progression (TTP)
Time Frame: 3.5 years
defined as the time from treatment initiation to the first occurrence of disease progression.
3.5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
objective response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: 3.5 years
defined as the percentage of patients with complete or partial response
3.5 years
Disease control rate (DCR)
Time Frame: 3.5 years
defined as the percentage of patients with complete or partial response, or stable disease
3.5 years
overall survival
Time Frame: 3.5 years
defined as the time from treatment initiation until death from any reason.
3.5 years
treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)
Time Frame: 3.5 years
assessed based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0
3.5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
First People's Hospital of Foshan
Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital
Zhongshan People's Hospital, Guangdong, China
Jieyang People's Hospital
Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital
Affiliate Hospital of Guangdong Medical University
Guangzhou Development District Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 10, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MIIR-16-Retro

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings