Testing Two Interventions to Improve Health Outcomes and Quality of Life Among Rural Older Adults Living With HIV

September 17, 2025 updated by: Jennifer Walsh, Medical College of Wisconsin

Testing the Efficacy of Two Interventions to Improve Health Outcomes and Quality of Life Among Rural Older Adults Living With HIV

Engagement in HIV medical care and adherence to HIV medications are both essential in improving health outcomes among people living with HIV (PLH), but PLH living in rural areas-who suffer higher mortality rates than their urban counterparts-can confront multiple barriers to care engagement and adherence, especially as they face the logistical, medical, and social challenges associated with aging. This project will test the efficacy of two interventions to determine their impact on HIV health outcomes and quality of life among rural, older PLH living in the Southern U.S. The two interventions, adapted from evidence-based interventions and delivered remotely, are: (1) supportive-expressive peer social support groups and (2) strengths-based case management. We hypothesize that both interventions will increase viral suppression, antiretroviral therapy adherence, and health-related quality of life and decrease depressive symptoms. Results from this study will provide us with tools to improve health outcomes for rural older people living with HIV.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
352

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Jennifer Walsh, PhD
  • Phone Number: 414-955-7710
  • Email: jwalsh@mcw.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53202
        • Recruiting
        • Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 50 years or greater
  • Living in a county with a score of .4 or higher on the index of relative rurality (IRR)
  • Living in Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, or West Virginia
  • Living with HIV
  • Has a telephone at home
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not meeting eligibility criteria described above

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Supportive-Expressive Peer Social Support Group + Individual Strengths-Based Case Management
Behavioral: Supportive-Expressive Peer Social Support Group Intervention
The social support group intervention involves weekly virtual support group meetings for 8 consecutive weeks. The groups, facilitated by trained research staff, will last approximately 90 minutes each week and include 5-12 individuals per group. Groups will follow pre-determined topic areas, with participants encouraged to explore their feelings about the difficulties associated with normal aging, being HIV-positive, and living with HIV/AIDS as an older adult. Facilitators will encourage mutual support among group members, promote greater openness and emotional expressiveness, and help participants to improve their social and family support and enhance their quality of life. This intervention is an adaptation of Telephone Supportive-Expressive Group Therapy.
Behavioral: Individual Strengths-Based Case Management Intervention
The strengths-based case management (SBCM) intervention helps participants address the multiple structural barriers faced by rural older people living with HIV. This intervention, delivered by trained research staff, includes two 60-minute telephone- or video-based SBCM counseling sessions, with shorter follow-up sessions to check-in on progress and help patients navigate identified barriers. The case manager will provide tailored sessions based on individually-identified needs and proximal life stressors. Capitalizing on participants' personal strengths, case managers will help empower participants to navigate issues related to employment, insurance, mental health, housing, or transportation. This may include assistance understanding, applying for, and accessing benefits or programs.
Experimental: Supportive-Expressive Peer Social Support Group
Behavioral: Supportive-Expressive Peer Social Support Group Intervention
The social support group intervention involves weekly virtual support group meetings for 8 consecutive weeks. The groups, facilitated by trained research staff, will last approximately 90 minutes each week and include 5-12 individuals per group. Groups will follow pre-determined topic areas, with participants encouraged to explore their feelings about the difficulties associated with normal aging, being HIV-positive, and living with HIV/AIDS as an older adult. Facilitators will encourage mutual support among group members, promote greater openness and emotional expressiveness, and help participants to improve their social and family support and enhance their quality of life. This intervention is an adaptation of Telephone Supportive-Expressive Group Therapy.
Experimental: Individual Strengths-Based Case Management
Behavioral: Individual Strengths-Based Case Management Intervention
The strengths-based case management (SBCM) intervention helps participants address the multiple structural barriers faced by rural older people living with HIV. This intervention, delivered by trained research staff, includes two 60-minute telephone- or video-based SBCM counseling sessions, with shorter follow-up sessions to check-in on progress and help patients navigate identified barriers. The case manager will provide tailored sessions based on individually-identified needs and proximal life stressors. Capitalizing on participants' personal strengths, case managers will help empower participants to navigate issues related to employment, insurance, mental health, housing, or transportation. This may include assistance understanding, applying for, and accessing benefits or programs.
No Intervention: HIV Information Only
This arm will not receive either of the interventions but will receive information on successfully aging with HIV.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Viral Suppression
Time Frame: 4 and 12 month follow-ups
HIV viral load will be assessed using self-collected dried blood spot (DBS) samples, with samples collecting using HemaSpot devices. Viral suppression will be defined as a measured viral load less than or equal to 839 copies/mL.
4 and 12 month follow-ups
Antiretroviral Treatment Medication Adherence
Time Frame: 4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Recent (past 30 day) antiretroviral treatment adherence will be self-reported using the 3-item Wilson Medication Adherence Scale. The calculated scale range is 0-100, with higher scores indicating more consistent medication adherence.
4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Health-related quality of life will be self-reported using the 31-item World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Assessment for PLH (WHOQOL-HIV BREF). The calculated scale range is 0-100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Composite scores will be calculated in line with Walsh et al., 2024.
4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: 4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Depressive symptoms during the past 2 weeks will be self-reported via completion of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The calculated scale range is 0-27, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms.
4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Structural Barriers
Time Frame: 4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Participants will self-report structural barriers they have faced in the past 3 months, with items assessing the following barriers: not having current health insurance, transportation as a barrier to health care, finances as a barrier to health care, not having enough food to eat, not having stable housing, and lacking eHealth literacy. Participants will be coded as having faced or not having faced each barrier, and barriers will be summed to indicate a score from 0-6, with higher scores indicating more structural barriers.
4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Social Support
Time Frame: 4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Social support will be self-reported using the 19-item Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Scale. Scale scores range from 1-5, with higher scores indicating more social support.
4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Loneliness
Time Frame: 4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Loneliness will be self-reported using the 5-item Loneliness survey from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox. Scale scores range from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater loneliness.
4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Internalized HIV Stigma
Time Frame: 4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Internalized HIV stigma will be self-reported using the 6-item internalized stigma subscale of the HIV Stigma Mechanisms scale. Scale scores range from 1-5, with higher scores indicating more internalized stigma.
4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
General Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
General self-efficacy will be self-reported using the 8-item New General Self-Efficacy Scale. Scale scores range from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.
4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
HIV treatment adherence self-efficacy will be self-reported using the 8-item HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale (HIV-ASES). Scale scores range from 0-4, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.
4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Accessing Needed Social and Medical Services
Time Frame: 4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups
Participants will self-report which of 12 HIV-related social and medical services they have needed during the previous 3 months, and which of these needed services they were able to obtain. A composite variable will indicate whether participants successfully accessed at least one needed service (0 = no, 1 = yes).
4, 8, and 12 month follow-ups

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical College of Wisconsin

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Walsh, PhD, Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Petroll, MD, Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 17, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R01NR020770 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings