Is Trogocytosis a Predictive Marker of CAR-T Cell Response in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma? (CARTROG)

June 17, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

La Trogocytose Est-elle un Marqueur prédictif de la réponse Aux Cellules CAR-T Dans Les Lymphomes Diffus à Grandes Cellules B ?

CAR-T cell therapy has improved survival in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL R/R). However, only 65% of patients achieve a complete metabolic response after this treatment. To date, there is no predictive test for therapeutic response after injection of CAR-T cells. Recent studies have shown that the level of trogocytosis by immune cells correlates with the persistence of tumor cells in patients with hematological malignancies. Our main objective is to identify a phenotypic "signature" of trogocytosis predictive of therapeutic response 6 months after injection of CAR-T cells for DLBCL.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The therapeutic use of CAR-T cells (Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cells) has significantly improved the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, only 65% of patients achieve metabolic complete response after this treatment, and one year after CAR-T cells infusion, between 50 and 60% of patients have relapsed or died. Injection of CAR-T cells can also be responsible for serious immunologic and hematologic adverse events. To date, there is no predictive test for the therapeutic response or toxicity following injection of CAR-T cells.

Trogocytosis is a physiological mechanism by which an effector immune cell integrates fragments of the membrane of target cells into its membrane. These aberrant membrane markers can directly modify the functions of the cell that has acquired them. Although the physiological role of trogocytosis remains debated, recent studies have shown that the level of trogocytosis in immune effector cells is correlated with persistent tumor cells in patients with hematological malignancies.

Our main hypothesis is that, in DLBCL, the level of early trogocytosis, assessed by the aberrant expression of tumor markers on the surface of CAR-T cells and other immune effector cells between D0 and D30 after CAR-T cells infusion, correlates with therapeutic response at M6 and/or the occurrence of immunological or severe hematological CAR-T cells side-effects.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
85

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Montpellier, France
      • Montpellier, France
        • Recruiting
        • Clinical Investigation Center, University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For patients

    • Patient who has given free and informed consent in writing for inclusion in the non-interventional CART-BANK protocol, and orally for the CARTROG protocol,
    • Patients over 18 years of age at the time of inclusion,
    • Diagnosis of LDGCB,
    • Decision to treat with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells,
    • Patient affiliated to or benefiting from a social security scheme.

  • For healthy volunteers:

    • Given free and informed oral consent for inclusion in the CARTROG protocol,
    • Donor between 18 and 70 years of age at the time of inclusion,
    • No history of solid cancer or hematological malignancy,
    • No known chronic pathology (e.g. hypertension, diabetes, etc.) and no daily treatment,
    • No surgical treatment within the last 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not meet all the inclusion criteria,
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding patient,
  • Patient unable to follow the procedures and/or frequency of visits planned in the trial, for psychological, family, social or geographical reasons,
  • Patient unable to consent freely to inclusion, under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Patients
Blood sample for Flow cytometry analysis
Other: Flow cytometry analysis to determine the level of trogocytosis by effector immune cells in patients
For each patient, a blood sample will be taken at D0 before the CAR-T cells are injected then at D3, D7, D10, D30 after the injection. Flow cytometry analysis will be performed on each sample on the day of collection to determine the level of trogocytosis by effector immune cells (T lymphocytes, NK cells, CAR-T cells) and to define the phenotypic "signature" of trogocytosis.
Other: healthy volunteer donor
Blood sample for Flow cytometry analysis
Other: Flow cytometry analysis to determine the level of trogocytosis by effector immune cells in volunteers
For each healthy volunteer, a single blood sample will be taken at enrollment. Flow cytometry analysis will be performed on each sample on the day of collection to determine the level of trogocytosis of normal lymphocytes and NK cells.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of a phenotypic "signature" of trogocytosis predictive of failure to achieve a complete metabolic response for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Time Frame: During 6 months after CAR-T cells injection

Using flow cytometry to determine the level of trogocytosis, the phenotypic "signature" of trogocytosis will be assessed by the AUC : area under the ROC (Receiver operating characteristic) curve; established on circulating CAR-T cells, T lymphocytes and NK cells of patients, and defined as: the percentage of cells aberrantly expressing different tumor antigens normally expressed on lymphoma cells (CD19, CD20, etc.) at the different analysis times and/or the median florescence intensity (MFI) of the expression of these markers at the different analysis times and/or the evolution of these percentages and the MFI between 2 analysis times.

Failure to obtain a complete metabolic response will be defined by: the absence of a complete metabolic response on the PET scans of D30, D90 and M6 in the absence of implementation of a new therapeutic line; or by the absence of complete metabolic response on all PET scans carried out before the implementation of a new therapeutic line.
During 6 months after CAR-T cells injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of a phenotypic "signature" of trogocytosis predictive of the occurrence of grade II or more immunological adverse events
Time Frame: During 60 days after CAR-T cells injection
Using flow cytometry analysis, the phenotypic "signature" will be assessed by the AUC used to predict the occurrence of immunological side effects (Cytokine Release Syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome) of grade II or + according to the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy ASTCT2 criteria. It will be established on circulating CAR-T, T lymphocytes and NK cells of patients, and defined as : the percentage of cells aberrantly expressing different tumor antigens normally expressed on lymphoma cells at the different analysis times,and/or the MFI of the expression of these markers at the different analysis times and/or the evolution of these percentages and the MFI between 2 analysis times.The occurrence of immunological side effects between D0 and D60 will be assessed by clinical and, if necessary, paraclinical examinations (lumbar puncture, brain MRI, etc.). The grade will be evaluated according to the ASTCT2 criteria.
During 60 days after CAR-T cells injection
Identification of a phenotypic "signature" of trogocytosis predictive of the occurrence of serious hematological side effects.
Time Frame: Between Day 30 and 6 months after CAR-T cells injection
Flow cytometry analysis will be performed to determine the level of trogocytosis by effector cells. The phenotypic "signature" of trogocytosis will be assessed by the AUC used to predict the occurrence of serious hematological side effects (grade III or + cytopenias according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CTCAE 5.03 between D30 and M6 after injection of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells .It will be established on circulating CAR-T, T lymphocytes and NK cells of patients, and defined as :the percentage of cells aberrantly expressing different tumor antigens normally expressed on lymphoma cells at the different analysis times, and/or the MFI of the expression of these markers at the different analysis times and/or the evolution of these percentages and the MFI between 2 analysis times. The occurrence of hematological side effects between D30 and M6 will be assessed by blood counts. The grade will be evaluated according to the CTCAE v5.03 criteria.
Between Day 30 and 6 months after CAR-T cells injection
Determination of the trogocytosis level of normal lymphocytes and NK cells in healthy subjects
Time Frame: At enrollment
Flow cytometry analysis will be performed on each sample on the day of collection (at enrollment), to determine the level of trogocytosis which will be evaluated by simple analysis of the trogocytosis phenotype of normal lymphocytes and NK cells in healthy subjects. This result will be considered as a negative control to determine the phenotypic "signature" of trogocytosis of the primary and secondary outcomes above.
At enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Montpellier

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Florence GALTIER, MD, Montpellier University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Ludovic GABELLIER, MD, Montpellier University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 22, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 22, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 22, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RECHMPL24_0076
  • 2024-A00508-39 (Registry Identifier: ID RCB)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on Flow cytometry analysis to determine the level of trogocytosis by effector immune cells in patients

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings