The Effect of Jigsaw Technique on Childhood Epileptic Seizure Management Knowledge and Attitudes of Nursing Students
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
İzmir, Turkey, 35100
- Ege University Faculty of Nursing
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Volunteering to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not attending trainings and not filling out data collection forms
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental
Students in the Jigsaw technique group are divided into 5 home groups consisting of 8 people.Each student in the groups was randomly included to be an expert on a subject under 8 headings.In the home group, students assigned to different subject specializations were combined with students selected as experts in the same subject.
This group was called the "expert group".The experts came together a week later, explained what they had learned on the common topic, discussed the topics they had taken notes while researching and reading in expert groups, and noted any additional points or missing parts they had learned.
After completing their tasks in the expert groups, students returned to their home groups.
They explained the information they learned in the expert group to each other in the home group, and as a home group, they brought together different topics and reported the main topic.
|
Jigsaw Technique
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Traditional education group
Students in the traditional education group were given training by the researchers with a powerpoint presentation.
Students are divided into 5 groups of 8 people.
Training was given in 3 sessions for each group, for a total of 15 sessions.
The training duration was 45 minutes for each session (one lesson hour).During the training, a projector, training slides and training videos on seizure types were used.
Direct explanation and question-answer techniques were used in the training.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Childhood epilepsies and epileptic seizure management knowledge test scores
Time Frame: Before and after training (Half an hour before training and within half an hour after training)
|
It consists of 15 questions answered as Yes-No-I Don't Know.
The count was analyzed as a percentage.
There is no total score.
|
Before and after training (Half an hour before training and within half an hour after training)
|
|
Epilepsy knowledge and attitude scale scores
Time Frame: Before and after training (Half an hour before training and within half an hour after training)
|
Epilepsy Knowledge and Attitude Scale consists of 16 items measuring knowledge about epilepsy and 14 items measuring attitude.
For the knowledge scale, correct = 1, incorrect and no idea = 0.
A high score indicates high knowledge.
Responses regarding the attitude part of the scale; I strongly disagree = 5, I disagree = 4, I have no idea = 3, I agree = 2, and I completely agree = 1.
Higher scores indicate a more positive attitude towards epilepsy.
|
Before and after training (Half an hour before training and within half an hour after training)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Students' self-confidence
Time Frame: Before and after training (Half an hour before training and within half an hour after training)
|
Students were determined based on self-report.
It was answered as Yes or No.
|
Before and after training (Half an hour before training and within half an hour after training)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1919B012202144
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.