Recurrence and Bleeding in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Cancer-associated Venous Thrombembolism

July 11, 2024 updated by: Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have a higher risk of both venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding (MB). Patients with CRC are underrepresented in the major trials examining treatment of cancer-associated VTE with anticoagulant.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have a higher risk of both venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding (MB). Specifically, a subsequent analysis of the Hokusai study showed that the excess in MB was confined to patients with gastrointestinal cancer. In the RIETE registry, patients with gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancers experienced more bleeding outcomes while patients with brain or lung cancer experienced more thrombotic outcomes. However, in a subgroup analysis of the Caravaggio trial, major gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with CRC was low and similar in both apixaban and LMWH groups. Patients with CRC are underrepresented in the major trials examining treatment of CAT with anticoagulant. Despite concerns that DOACs pose a significant bleeding risk in CRC patients, many patients with CRC are treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban in clinical practice. Balancing risks of thrombosis recurrence and bleeding can be challenging and requires a nuanced, individualized approach to decision making to improve prognosis in this population. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for recurrence and bleeding in CRC patients with VTE. Deaths, regardless of the mechanism, will also be included in the one year all-cause mortality outcome.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510655
        • The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with histologically confirmed CRC and symptomatic or incidental VTE who received anticoagulant treatment at The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University from January 2019 to January 2023. VTE was considered cancer-related if the patient had a diagnosis of CRC within six months before or after the VTE diagnosis, any cancer treatment within the previous six months, or recurrent/metastatic cancer regardless of treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with histologically confirmed CRC and symptomatic or incidental VTE who received anticoagulant treatment.
  2. CRC patients with VTE treated with an anticoagulant (rivaroxaban or LMWH) for at least six months.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Participation in this study required active anticoagulant treatment. Apart from this, there were no specific exclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients with adverse anticoagulant outcomes
Patients with adverse anticoagulant outcomes in the study period. Adverse anticoagulant outcomes include venous thromboembolism recurrence, major bleeding, and clinical relevant non major bleeding.
Other: Data collection
A prospectively maintained database query of all patients with CRC and VTE was initially performed, and then each patient's electronic record was reviewed for inclusion criteria.
Patients without any adverse anticoagulant outcomes
Patients without any adverse anticoagulant outcomes in the study period.
Other: Data collection
A prospectively maintained database query of all patients with CRC and VTE was initially performed, and then each patient's electronic record was reviewed for inclusion criteria.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recurrent VTE including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE)
Time Frame: From the date of index VTE to VTE recurrence, assessed up to 12 months
Recurrent DVT had to be confirmed by duplex ultrasonography, venography, CT, or MRI. Recurrent PE was confirmed by CT, MRI, conventional pulmonary angiography, or VQ (ventilation/perfusion) imaging. Fatal PE had to be based on objective diagnostic testing, autopsy, or death that could not be attributed to a documented cause and for which PE/DVT could not be ruled out (unexplained death). Incidental VTE recurrence had to be identified via surveillance-related imaging. To be classified as a recurrent event, a new filling defect had to be evident on the second study, not appreciated on the original images, or an interval study clearly showing thrombus resolution.
From the date of index VTE to VTE recurrence, assessed up to 12 months
Major Bleeding (MB)
Time Frame: From the date of index VTE to MB occurrence, assessed up to 12 months
MB was defined as overt bleeding plus a hemoglobin decrease of ≥ 2 g/dL after the incident, requirement for transfusion of ≥ 2 units of packed read blood cells, or intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, pericardial, retroperitoneal, intramuscular causing compartment syndrome, or fatal bleeding.
From the date of index VTE to MB occurrence, assessed up to 12 months
Clinical Relevant Non Major Bleeding (CRNMB)
Time Frame: From the date of index VTE to CRNMB occurrence, assessed up to 12 months
CRNMB was defined as overt bleeding not meeting the criteria for MB but associated with medical intervention, unscheduled contact with a member of the health care team, temporary cessation of the treatment, or impairment of activities of daily life.
From the date of index VTE to CRNMB occurrence, assessed up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All cause mortality
Time Frame: One year follow up since index VTE identified until the date of death from any cause, whichever came first, , assessed up to 12 months
Deaths, regardless of the mechanism, were included in the all-cause mortality outcome
One year follow up since index VTE identified until the date of death from any cause, whichever came first, , assessed up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: xiaoyan li, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 16, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 16, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 11, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2024ZSLYEC-226

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings