Bidirectional Cohort Study on Improvement of Quality of Life in Patients After Coronary Intervention With Kuanxiong Aerosol

August 4, 2025 updated by: Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

The goal of this observational study is to compare in patients with Angina Pectoris after PCI for Coronary Heart Disease. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • To evaluate the effect of Kuanxiong Aerosol on the quality of life of patients with angina pectoris after PCI for Coronary Heart Disease.
  • To evaluate the effect of Kuanxiong Aerosol on relieving angina pectoris and improving cardiac function.

The comparison group will received routine treatment .The experimental group will received sublingual spray of Kuanxiong Aerosol on the basis of routine treatment，two sprays per time，three times a day, for a continuous month. After 1 month of treatment, the quality of life, the improvement of cardiac function and the relief of angina pectoris were compared between the two groups. Researchers will compare two groups to see if Kuanxiong Aerosol can improve the quality of life, cardiac function, and reduce the frequency and duration of angina pectoris in patients with angina pectoris after PCI.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population was patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease who still had angina after PCI surgery in the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University from 2019 to 2023

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet the diagnostic criteria for coronary heart disease
  • Age 18~80 years old, male and female, lower limbs can move freely
  • Patients with coronary angiography or coronary CT angiography indicating that the rate of coronary artery large vessel stenosis is greater than 80%
  • Patients with angina pectoris (angina pectoris frequency ≥3 times/week) after PCI according to the judgment of the treating physician
  • According to the doctor's judgment, patients who need to use conventional drugs (ACEI/ARB, β-blockers), and patients who need to use Kuanxiong Aerosol drugs on the basis of conventional drug therapy
  • Patients voluntarily sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic to ingredients contained in Kuanxiong Aerosol
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting was prepared during the trial
  • Blood lipid and uric acid exceeding 1.5 times the upper limit of normal reference value; Uncontrolled severe hypertension with systolic blood pressure >180mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure >110mmHg
  • severe hepatic and renal insufficiency (ALT, AST or TBIL>1.5 times the upper limit of normal reference value, Cr >1.5 times the upper limit of normal reference value)
  • Malignant tumors
  • Severe arrhythmias (such as rapid atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, high atrioventricular block, etc.)
  • Women who are pregnant or trying to become pregnant
  • The researcher judged that it is not suitable to participate in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The improvement of quality of life in two groups after one month of treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 months.
Compare the changes in SF-36 scores before and after treatment between two groups of patients. SF-36 consists of 9 dimensions and 36 items: Physical Functioning (PF), Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP), Bodily Pain (BP), General Health Perception (GH), Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE), and Mental Health (MH). SF-36 can be self-administered, interviewer-administered, or conducted via telephone inquiry. The main statistical indicator for SF-36 is calculating the health scores for the eight dimensions. Based on the rescaled values of each item within each dimension, initial and final scores can be calculated for these eight dimensions. The scoring method involves summing up the weighted scores of individual items within each dimension to obtain a raw score for that dimension, which is then converted into a standardized score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scale scores indicate better quality of life.
Baseline and 1 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The relief of angina pectoris and the improvement of cardiac function in the two groups after one month of treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 months.
(1)The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a self-administered,disease-specific measure of angina severity. The SAQ quantifies patients'physical limitations causedby angina, the frequency of and recent changes intheir symptoms, their satisfaction with treatment,and the degree to which they perceive their disease to affect their quality of life. Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate betterfunction (e.g., less physical limitation, less angina,and better quality of life) . The Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score averages the domains of angina limitation, frequency, and quality of life to provide an overall metric of angina severity. (2)Indicators related to cardiac function include serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD), and 6-minute walking distance. Both LVEF and LVEDD are obtained through cardiac color Doppler ultrasound examination.
Baseline and 1 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 28, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 4, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NFEC-2023-415

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings