MRD-Guided Consolidation Therapy Following Definitive Radiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer

August 3, 2024 updated by: Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

A Phase II Clinical Trial of Consolidation Therapy Guided by MRD Testing After Radical Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

To further validate the performance of the high-sensitivity MRD assay in patients with squamous esophageal cancer who have completed radical radiotherapy; to validate whether MRD-negative patients can maintain a good prognosis under regular follow-up; and to validate whether MRD-positive patients can improve their survival with consolidation therapy with PD-1 monotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common lethal tumours in the world and accounts for more than 50% of new cases in China. Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer, and the 5-year survival rate is only about 30%, but due to the lack of evidence, consolidation therapy has not been explicitly recommended in major guidelines.

In the CheckMate 577 study, patients who did not achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after surgery improved their survival through immunology consolidation therapy with PD-1 monotherapy, suggesting that patients who did not achieve clinical complete response (cCR) after radiotherapy may benefit from immunology consolidation therapy. This suggests that patients who do not have a clinical complete response (cCR) after radiotherapy are likely to benefit from immunology consolidation therapy. Patients with cCR after radiotherapy may achieve similar results to those achieved with radical surgery, and consolidation is probably not necessary.

However, existing clinical practice is unable to accurately determine the efficacy of radiotherapy in esophageal cancer, making risk-of-recurrence-guided stratified consolidation strategies difficult to achieve. Most of the ongoing radiotherapy-immunotherapy studies in esophageal cancer have been designed to treat all patients indiscriminately with immunology consolidation therapy, which may lead to over-treatment of cCR patients.

Therefore, there is an urgent need to find easily accessible and reliable biomarkers for the efficacy of radiotherapy in esophageal cancer, and to carry out prospective clinical studies as soon as possible, so as to optimize the strategy of consolidation therapy after radiotherapy in esophageal cancer. The high sensitivity of minimal residual disease (MRD) detection technology established by the researcher's team provides a prerequisite for this.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥18 years, any gender
  2. Histologically or cytologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of esophageal cancer. The initial clinical stage is I-VIa (2018 AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition) , primary unresectable oesophageal cancer
  3. ECOG performance status <= 1.
  4. No significant abnormality in laboratory routine indicators such as blood routine and liver and kidney function
  5. Completed radical radiotherapy (dose 50-60Gy);
  6. Received a systemic regimen of platinum in combination with paclitaxel or a 5-FU-based two-drug regimen with or without PD-1 monotherapy in accordance with the CSCO guidelines, and S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients;
  7. Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with other cancer history except hypopharyngeal carcinoma in situ, non-malignant skin cancer and cervical carcinoma in situ.
  2. Active infection currently exists, serious illness such as myocardial infarction in the 6 months prior to enrolment
  3. History of autoimmune diseases
  4. Participate in other clinical trials at present or within 4 weeks before enrollment;
  5. Received systemic therapy (chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy) for more than 4 cycles.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: MRD negative
Intervention name: regular review of MRD monitoring; Intervention description: thoracic and abdominal CT, Esophagography and MRD monitoring every 3 months for 2 years after completion of radiotherapy
Experimental: MRD positive
Intervention name: PD-1 monoclonal antibody consolidation therapy;
Drug: PD-1 monoclonal antibody consolidation therapy
PD-1 monoclonal antibody-based consolidation therapy for 1 year after completion of radiotherapy (or combination chemotherapy up to 4 cycles if less than 4 cycles of chemotherapy). Specific dosing: PD-1 monoclonal antibody, 200mg every 3 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 36 month
Median progression-free survival (PFS), was defined as the time from the end of radiotherapy to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
36 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
5-year overall survival
Time Frame: 60 month
Overall survival was defined as the time from the end of radiotherapy to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. OS is reported for all participants of the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculated the 5-year survival probability.
60 month
Cancer specific survival
Time Frame: 60 month
From the end of radiotherapy to death specifically attributed to esophageal cancer.
60 month
Incidence of radiotherapy and immunotherapy related toxicity
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 year
Acute toxicity Rate, was defined as the frequency of toxicities related to the treatment, which arises during radiotherapy and within three month after the end of radiotherapy, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event,Version 5.0 (CTC AE5.0). Late toxicity rate, was defined as the frequency of toxicities related to the treatment, which arises three month after the end of radiotherapy, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event,Version 5.0 (CTC AE5.0).
Through study completion, an average of 3 year
Quality of life score(QOL) for swallowing function
Time Frame: 36 month
Evluated by the score of the participants through The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Oesophageal Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OES18). The EORTC QLQ-OES18 is a disease-specific questionnaire developed and validated to address measurements specific to esophageal cancer and contains 18 items assessing symptoms of dysphagia, pain, reflux symptoms, eating restrictions, anxiety, dry mouth, taste, body image, and hair loss. All subscale items were scored using a four-point Likert scale with the following response choices: 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much. Raw scores for the subscales were standardized into a range of 0 to 100 by linear transformation, with higher symptom scores represent a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
36 month
General Quality of life score(QOL)
Time Frame: 36 month
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Subscale Scores in Participants. The score of the participants evaluated by The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the Global Health Status (GHS) question were scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning.
36 month

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Circulating DNA as biomarkers for the predicting of efficacy
Time Frame: 36 months
To explore the dynamic changes of circulating tumor DNA (the frequency of specific mutations by Next-generation sequencing Methodology) from baseline, before and after radiotherapy and their relationship with recurrence.
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
Hebei Medical University Fourth Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BEIR 2

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer

Clinical Trials on PD-1 monoclonal antibody consolidation therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings