Optimizing Surgical and Prosthetic Workflow for Implant-supported Ear and Nose Prostheses With Early Loading and Distant Prosthesis Fabrication: A Prospective Cohort Study
Facial defects created by trauma, oncological procedures or congenital conditions can be repaired with ear, nose and/or eye prostheses. These are fixed on intraosseous implants placed in the temporal, nasal and orbital bone. To date, an osseointegration period of 3-6 months is maintained after which the implants are loaded.
This study aims to achieve two goals:
- To load the implants with a nose or ear prosthesis within one month (preferably <3 weeks). Patients with an orbital prosthesis will not be recruited. In other words, an optimization of an existing protocol will be investigated. The quality of life of the patients as well as possible complications of the implants will be investigated.
- Because of the short time between the surgery and the placement of the prosthesis, the prosthesis will be fabricated remotely. This means that the patient will not have to travel to the prosthetist. The feasibility and aesthetics will be analyzed through questionnaires for the patient.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients with a facial defect in the nasal and/or temporal area that will not be repaired with autologous tissue;
- Adult patients receiving oncological resection or trauma resulting in a facial defect in the nose and/or ear that will not be repaired with autologous tissue;
- Patients who can come to the hospital every week for 6 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with insufficient bone mass for implant placement
- Patients who cannot come to the hospital for weekly follow-ups
- Patients that wish an autologous reconstruction
- Patient is unable to tolerate general anesthesia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Early loading of craniofacial prosthesis
|
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of implant survival in nasal and temporal bone from 0-100%
Time Frame: 6 months after placement of implants
|
Investigate craniofacial implant survival.
100% being better than 0%.
|
6 months after placement of implants
|
|
Peri-implant complications using the Holgers' (grade 0-4)
Time Frame: 6 months after placement of implants
|
Investigate craniofacial peri-implant complications after early loading concept using the Holgers' scale from 0, meaning excellent peri-implant status to 4 necessitating removal of the implant.
|
6 months after placement of implants
|
|
Peri-implant complications using the IPS scale (IPS-score)
Time Frame: 6 months after placement of implants
|
Investigate craniofacial peri-implant complications after early loading concept using the IPS scale.
Only the 'percutaneous' part of the scale will be used.
IPS scale ranges from no treatment to removal of the implant.
|
6 months after placement of implants
|
|
Quality of Life with SF-36, SWLS and RSES and self-made questionnaire
Time Frame: Before treatment and 6 months after implant placement
|
Assessing the patient's quality of life using the early loading protocol with standardised and self-made questionnaires.
The SF-36 scoring will result in 8 scales ranging from 0-100 with the lower the score the more disability.
SWLS will result in a range of 5-35.
The higher the score the higher the satisfaction with life.
RSES ranges from 0-30.
Scores between 15 and 25 are considered in the normal range whereas scores below 15 suggest low self-esteem.
The self-made questionnaires will result in percentages of the given answers.
|
Before treatment and 6 months after implant placement
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in surface matching of the midface and temporal area in mm
Time Frame: 6 months after implant placement
|
By matching and comparing surface scans we can analyse the swelling in the midface and temporal area after directly after surgery and postoperatively.
These will result in positive or negative changes and expressed in millimeters.
|
6 months after implant placement
|
|
Implant stability over time with implant stability quotient (ISQ) range 1-100
Time Frame: 6 months after implant placement
|
By measuring stability we can create an osseointegration timeline for craniofacial implants.
Higher values indicate higher stability.
Values in between 55 and 85 are considered acceptable.
|
6 months after implant placement
|
|
Feasibility of remote prosthesis fabrication
Time Frame: 6 months after implant placement
|
Questionnaires assessing the experience of the patient and aesthetics of the prosthesis
|
6 months after implant placement
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ONZ-2024-0171
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.