Healthy Lifestyles in Bipolar Disorder: Bay Area Study

January 12, 2026 updated by: University of California, Berkeley

Time-restricted Eating as an Adjunctive Intervention for Bipolar Disorder

The goal of this clinical trial is to understand how level of adherence with time-restricted eating (TRE) predicts change in diurnal rhythms (as measured using the amplitude of diurnal peripheral clock gene expression), and how those changes predict lower mania and depressive symptoms, and downstream improvements in quality of life. The effects of diurnal amplitude of clock gene expression is expected to remain significant when controlling for change in glucose tolerance and inflammation. Participants will be enrolled who are already receiving medication treatment for bipolar disorder. Participants will complete daily measures of eating, sleep and mood for two weeks, and then will be assigned to follow TRE for eight weeks. Symptoms and Quality of Life will be measured at baseline and during and after the food plan.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single-arm trial to examine the effects of time-restricted eating on change in diurnal rhythms, manic and depressive symptoms, and quality of life. In time-restricted eating (TRE), participants will be asked to limit their food intake to a period of 10 hours per day. TRE will be an addition to standard medication approaches in bipolar disorder. Participants who are receiving medical treatment for bipolar disorder and who report at least some sleep or circadian problems will complete baseline measures and then will be asked to follow TRE for 8 weeks, and then will complete measures of symptoms, Quality of Life, and possible treatment mechanisms at the mid-point of treatment, the end of treatment, and at 3 months after the intervention. If successful, this work will help understand key mechanisms through which TRE provides benefits for those with BD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Berkeley, California, United States, 94720-2010
        • Recruiting
        • University of California Berkeley
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sheri L Johnson, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meets diagnostic criteria for bipolar I disorder or bipolar II disorder (but not cyclothymia, bipolar disorder Not otherwise specified or bipolar disorder due to another medical condition) assessed by the Diagnostic Interview for Anxiety, Mood, and Obsessive-compulsive and Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders [DIAMOND])
  • current sleep (insomnia, hypersomnolence) or circadian sleep-wake (delayed phase, advanced phase, irregular sleep-wake, non-24-hour sleep-wake-type) concerns indicated by endorsement of at least some sleep or circadian-related impairment across the screening self-reports or interview
  • Living in an English-speaking country (and one that the researchers have expertise in research procedures and diet)
  • Has been speaking English for at least 10 years, speaks English in the home, or certifies that they are able to understand English well for the study and demonstrates this during the screening interview.
  • Receiving medical care for bipolar disorder (referrals will be provided for those who would like to begin care)
  • Mood-stabilizing medication regimens stable for at least one month
  • < 5 kg weight change in the past 3 months
  • Currently eating ≥ 12 hours per day at least twice per week
  • Able to operate the camera function and respond to web-based surveys by phone (loaner phones will be provided as needed)
  • Not engaged in current shift work or have other responsibilities such as providing care that would chronically disrupt their sleep (i.e., > 3 h between 22:00 and 05:00 h for at least 1 day/week)
  • Able to complete 7 days of dietary logs adequately (e.g., at least 2 entries per day, covering at least a 5-hour eating window) during the baseline period
  • Able to complete screening and baseline questionnaires adequately (e.g., not failing more than 1 attention check item with instructed responding; responding to standard multiple-choice items in a mean of < 2 seconds per item). Where individuals respond to more than 14 items in a row with the same response, their answers will be manually reviewed for possible invalidity.

Exclusion criteria include the following:

  • Current episode of depression, hypomania or mania, or psychosis (assessed by the DIAMOND), Participants with acute mood disorder episodes will be encouraged to seek treatment and to consider the study when symptoms have remitted.
  • Eating disorder diagnosis (by self-report of treatment or diagnosis at any point during their life, Short Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-QS) scores above clinical concern thresholds for eating disorders, or DIAMOND interview of symptoms during adulthood)
  • Past 3-month alcohol use disorder or substance use disorder (assessed by DIAMOND)
  • Active suicidal ideation coupled with plan, intent or attempt history as assessed by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale
  • Conditions that would interfere with ability to take part in the intervention, including pregnancy, breastfeeding, uncorrected hypo or hyperthyroidism, gastrointestinal conditions impairing nutrient absorption
  • Conditions that would confound immune or other study measures, such as HIV, AIDS, lupus, or multiple sclerosis
  • Medications contraindicated for fasting: clozapine, glucose-lowering medications, diabetes-related injections, medications requiring food early morning or late evening, corticosteroids; Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists will not be an exclusion criteria if weight stabilized
  • Cognitive deficits as noted during the initial interview or as indicated by low performance on the Orientation Memory Concentration Test- Short Version (weighted score < 20)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Time Restricted Eating (TRE) for 8 weeks
Participants will receive an intro to TRE and then throughout 8 weeks they will receive brief online psychoeducation several times per week with optional weekly coaching sessions. TRE involves restricting the window of eating to 10 hours/ day, most typically by avoiding eating in the first 1-2 hours after awakening and in the 2-4 before sleep. Those with an eating window > 14 hours will be asked to restrict their eating to 12 hours in the first week, then 10 hours in week 2. To select the period, investigators will ask Ss to review baseline logs to consider sleep, eating, family meals and social commitment schedules, and any special energy demands, such as exercise. During the eating window, no restrictions are placed on the type or quantity of food consumed. The investigators will instruct participants to follow their habitual diet within their 10-hour eating window and to aim to consume the same number of calories per day as they did at baseline.
Behavioral: Time-restricted eating for 8 weeks
limiting food intake to 10 hours per day
Other Names:
  • intermittent fasting

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mania
Time Frame: Lower YMRS at the end of intervention (10 weeks) as compared to baseline
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total scores (minimum: 0, maximum: 60, high scores reflect higher manic symptom severity)
Lower YMRS at the end of intervention (10 weeks) as compared to baseline
Depression
Time Frame: Lower MADRS at the end of intervention (10 weeks) as compared to baseline
Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) total scores (minimum: 0, maximum: 60, higher scores reflect higher depressive symptom severity)
Lower MADRS at the end of intervention (10 weeks) as compared to baseline
Self-rated Quality of Life (QOL)
Time Frame: Scores at 1.5-months post-intervention (16 weeks) as compared to baseline
self-rated Brief Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (QoL.BD) (minimum: 12, maximum: 60, higher scores reflect better QOL)
Scores at 1.5-months post-intervention (16 weeks) as compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability
Time Frame: immediately post-treatment (10 weeks after enrollment)
Participant self-ratings of the acceptability of the intervention: The primary index of acceptability will be the percentage of individuals who endorse that they agree or strongly agree that they would recommend the food plan to a friend. This single item has been used in previous trials of bipolar disorder. Higher agreement will be considered a positive outcome.
immediately post-treatment (10 weeks after enrollment)
Mania at follow-up
Time Frame: YMRS and LIFE scores will be lower at 3 months post-intervention as compared to baseline
YMRS (described above) and Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE; minimum 0, maximum 6) scores across follow-up (higher scores reflect more severe symptoms)
YMRS and LIFE scores will be lower at 3 months post-intervention as compared to baseline
Depression at follow-up
Time Frame: MADRS scores will be lower at 3 months post-intervention as compared to baseline
MADRS scores (described above) across follow-up
MADRS scores will be lower at 3 months post-intervention as compared to baseline
Self-rated mania
Time Frame: Lower PMQ scores at post-intervention (10 weeks) and at 1.5 and 3 months follow-ups post-intervention, as compared to baseline
Patient Health Questionnaire (PMQ) Mania scores (minimum: 0, maximum: 27, higher scores reflect more severe mania)
Lower PMQ scores at post-intervention (10 weeks) and at 1.5 and 3 months follow-ups post-intervention, as compared to baseline
Self-rated depression
Time Frame: post-intervention (10 weeks) and at 1.5 and 3 months follow-ups post-intervention, as compared to baseline
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) Depression scores (minimum: 0, maximum: 27, higher scores reflect more severe depression)
post-intervention (10 weeks) and at 1.5 and 3 months follow-ups post-intervention, as compared to baseline
Weekly change in mania severity
Time Frame: Weekly scores from the end of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention
Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) weekly mania scores post-treatment as compared to those at baseline. The investigators will administer the LIFE interview at 6 months after study entry, and interviewers will record a mania severity rating for each week, to cover the time from the end of intervention until 6-month follow-up. Better outcomes would be reflected in lower LIFE scores post-treatment.
Weekly scores from the end of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention
Daily emotional lability as assessed using ecological momentary assessment
Time Frame: 7 weeks post-study entry as compared to baseline
Mean square of successive difference of negative affect scores within derived from the ecological momentary assessments at 7 weeks post-baseline as compared to baseline. Participants will be asked to complete negative affect ratings 5 times per day for 7 days, at the baseline and mid-point of treatment. The investigators will calculate scores to examine the degree of negative affect variability for each day, and then take the average across 7 days at baseline and at treatment mid-point. Better outcomes would be indicated by lower scores.
7 weeks post-study entry as compared to baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, Berkeley

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of British Columbia
University College, London
Wellcome Trust
Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Deakin University
Swinburne University of Technology

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sheri L Johnson, PhD, University of California, Berkeley

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 22, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 12, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TRE_Study2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Measures, data, and analysis scripts will be shared through Open Science Foundation.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified data will be shared within one year after data collection ends.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be available publically through Open Science Foundation upon request. Wellcome Trust guidance for data sharing will be followed.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings