Effect of Spencer Muscle Energy Technique on Pain in Diabetic Stiff Shoulder
Effeect of Spencer Muscle Energy Technique on Pain in Diabetic Stiff Shoulder
Stiff shoulder is a painful and severely debilitating condition. The inflammatory contracture of the glenohumeral joint capsule in stiff shoulder restricts both active and passive range of motion, with loss of external rotation being especially characteristic of this condition (Dyer et al., 2023). Stiff shoulder is clinically described by the continuing onset of shoulder pain and advanced exacerbation of the shoulder joint leading to exertion in the higher extremity activity, significant disability, and functional restrictions. The most common symptom of a stiff shoulder is night pain, resulting in sleep impediment that leads to one-sided sleep on the uninfected shoulder (Mao et al., 2022).
Spencer technique is a standardized series of treatments with broad application to diagnose, treat and establish prognosis for restricted mobility in shoulder. It was developed by Spencer in 1961. It is a multistep technique that combines Spencer's positioning, sequencing, slow stretching of the shoulder complex within pain-free limits done by physical therapist while incorporating muscular energy with post-isometric contraction and relaxation (Babu And Putcha., 2022).
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
thirty diabetic female patients with Stiff shoulder with ages 45-55 years:
Group A(study group) :
15 patients received Spencer Muscle Energy Technique along with postural exercise 3 times a week for 8 week.
Group B (control group) :
15 patients received Classical physiotherapy treatment includes Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for 15 minutes hotpack on the painful area for 15 minutes along with postural exercise 3 times per week for 8 week.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Alaa El-Moatasem, lecturer
- Phone Number: 01006625054
- Email: alaamotasem@cu.edu.eg
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1) Women's age between 45 to 55 years old 2)Suffering from stiff shoulder for 2-12 months (stage 1 and 2) confirmed by an orthopaedic specialist.
3) Diagnosed as type 2 DM for at least 5 years. 4) No treatment other than analgesics
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. cases of traumatic stiff shoulder. 2. Osteoporosis and malignance of shoulder region. 3. Neurological deficit affect shoulder function. 4. rheumatoid arthritis. 5. recurrent subluxation of shoulder. 6. cervical radiculopathy. 7. history of shoulder surgery. 8. vascular diseases.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: spencer muscle energy technique
Spencer muscle energy technique (SMET) attempts to re-establish functional relationship between soft and articular tissues of the shoulder region, minimizes inflammatory and later developing fibrotic process, and restores arterial, venous, and lymphatic flow.
Like other OMT procedures, it not only restores joint functions, but enhances positive well-being and full expression of a patient's life.
In this technique, passive, smooth, rhythmic motion of the shoulder joint is done by the therapist to stretch contracted muscles, ligaments, and capsule (Babu And Putcha.,2022).
|
The effectiveness of MET found in chronic capsulitis is due to its effect on relieving pain, ensuring ROM incretions, and developing functional activities due to the muscle contraction in a precise direction and in a monitored position over resistance to assist in improving joint range by advancing joint flexibility.
This procedure is suggested for all joints with limited ROM (Butt & Tanveer, 2022).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
pain pressure threshold algometry
Time Frame: will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
|
Algometers are devices that can be used to identify the pressure and/or force eliciting a pressure-pain threshold.
|
will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
|
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
|
was used to assess the severity of pain before and after treatment for both groups
|
will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
goniometer
Time Frame: will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
|
measures the available range of motion
|
will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
|
|
SPADI (shoulder pain and disability index).
Time Frame: will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
|
It is a self-revealed measure created to assess shoulder pathological conditions
|
will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: NESREEN GHAREEB, Vice Dean, Professor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- P.T.REC/012/004908
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Frozen Shoulder
-
NCT06763679Recruiting
-
NCT02283996RecruitingAdhesive Capsulitis | Frozen Shoulder | Shoulder Frozen
-
NCT07644884Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07416916Recruiting
-
NCT07510737Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07482189Not yet recruitingFrozen Shoulder | Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder
-
NCT07390227Not yet recruitingShoulder Instability | Frozen Shoulder | Rotator Cuff Syndrome
-
NCT07278323RecruitingFrozen Shoulder | Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder
-
NCT07336849RecruitingFrozen Shoulder | Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis | Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder
-
NCT04715035CompletedFrozen Shoulder | Capsulitis, Adhesive | Capsulitis of Shoulder
Clinical Trials on spencer mscle energy technique
-
NCT04822324Completed
-
NCT07062926Not yet recruiting
-
NCT05398588Completed
-
NCT07080060Not yet recruitingAdhesive Capsulitis | Frozen Shoulder
-
NCT06407817Recruiting
-
NCT06668415Recruiting
-
NCT06757933Active, not recruitingAdhesive Capsulitis, Shoulder
-
NCT06739824Active, not recruiting
-
NCT07258368Completed