Effect of Spencer Muscle Energy Technique on Pain in Diabetic Stiff Shoulder

August 20, 2024 updated by: Alaa Mohamed El-Moatasem Mohamed, Cairo University

Effeect of Spencer Muscle Energy Technique on Pain in Diabetic Stiff Shoulder

Stiff shoulder is a painful and severely debilitating condition. The inflammatory contracture of the glenohumeral joint capsule in stiff shoulder restricts both active and passive range of motion, with loss of external rotation being especially characteristic of this condition (Dyer et al., 2023). Stiff shoulder is clinically described by the continuing onset of shoulder pain and advanced exacerbation of the shoulder joint leading to exertion in the higher extremity activity, significant disability, and functional restrictions. The most common symptom of a stiff shoulder is night pain, resulting in sleep impediment that leads to one-sided sleep on the uninfected shoulder (Mao et al., 2022).

Spencer technique is a standardized series of treatments with broad application to diagnose, treat and establish prognosis for restricted mobility in shoulder. It was developed by Spencer in 1961. It is a multistep technique that combines Spencer's positioning, sequencing, slow stretching of the shoulder complex within pain-free limits done by physical therapist while incorporating muscular energy with post-isometric contraction and relaxation (Babu And Putcha., 2022).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

thirty diabetic female patients with Stiff shoulder with ages 45-55 years:

Group A(study group) :

15 patients received Spencer Muscle Energy Technique along with postural exercise 3 times a week for 8 week.

Group B (control group) :

15 patients received Classical physiotherapy treatment includes Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for 15 minutes hotpack on the painful area for 15 minutes along with postural exercise 3 times per week for 8 week.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Women's age between 45 to 55 years old 2)Suffering from stiff shoulder for 2-12 months (stage 1 and 2) confirmed by an orthopaedic specialist.

    3) Diagnosed as type 2 DM for at least 5 years. 4) No treatment other than analgesics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. cases of traumatic stiff shoulder. 2. Osteoporosis and malignance of shoulder region. 3. Neurological deficit affect shoulder function. 4. rheumatoid arthritis. 5. recurrent subluxation of shoulder. 6. cervical radiculopathy. 7. history of shoulder surgery. 8. vascular diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: spencer muscle energy technique
Spencer muscle energy technique (SMET) attempts to re-establish functional relationship between soft and articular tissues of the shoulder region, minimizes inflammatory and later developing fibrotic process, and restores arterial, venous, and lymphatic flow. Like other OMT procedures, it not only restores joint functions, but enhances positive well-being and full expression of a patient's life. In this technique, passive, smooth, rhythmic motion of the shoulder joint is done by the therapist to stretch contracted muscles, ligaments, and capsule (Babu And Putcha.,2022).
The effectiveness of MET found in chronic capsulitis is due to its effect on relieving pain, ensuring ROM incretions, and developing functional activities due to the muscle contraction in a precise direction and in a monitored position over resistance to assist in improving joint range by advancing joint flexibility. This procedure is suggested for all joints with limited ROM (Butt & Tanveer, 2022).
Other Names:
  • spencer MET

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain pressure threshold algometry
Time Frame: will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
Algometers are devices that can be used to identify the pressure and/or force eliciting a pressure-pain threshold.
will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
was used to assess the severity of pain before and after treatment for both groups
will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
goniometer
Time Frame: will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
measures the available range of motion
will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
SPADI (shoulder pain and disability index).
Time Frame: will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks
It is a self-revealed measure created to assess shoulder pathological conditions
will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured after eight weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: NESREEN GHAREEB, Vice Dean, Professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P.T.REC/012/004908

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frozen Shoulder

Clinical Trials on spencer mscle energy technique

Subscribe