Accelerating Cognitive Gains From Digital Inverventions With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation

August 21, 2026 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Accelerating Cognitive Gains From Digital Meditation With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: A Pilot Study in MCI

The overall goal of this project is to collect pilot feasibility and early efficacy data showing improvements in cognition and wellbeing in adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) through a combination treatment of non-invasive brain stimulation (transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)) and a one of two digital cognitive interventions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

comfortably ambulatory healthy physical condition normal or corrected to normal visual auditory acuity fluency in spoken English Between 60-85 years old No neurological or psychiatric disorders No substance abuse Not taking anti-depressants Not taking anti-anxiety medication No history of seizures No color blindness No glaucoma No macular degeneration No amblyopia (lazy eye) No strabismus (cross eyed) Aneurysm clip(s) No Cardiac pacemaker No Implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) No Electronic implant or device No Magnetically-activated implant or device No Neurostimulation system No Spinal cord stimulator No Internal electrodes or wires No Bone growth/bone fusion stimulator No Cochlear, otologic, or other ear implant No Insulin or other infusion pump No Implanted drug infusion device No type of prosthesis (eye, penile, etc.) No Heart valve prosthesis No Eyelid spring or wire No Artificial or prosthetic limb No Metallic stent, filter, or coil No Shunt (spinal or intraventricular) No Vascular access port and/or catheter No Radiation seeds or implants No Swan-Ganz or thermodilution catheter No Medication patch (Nicotine, Nitroglycerine) No metallic fragment or metallic foreign body in/on the body that can not be removed No Wire mesh implant No Tissue expander (e.g., breast) No Surgical staples, clips, or metallic sutures No Joint replacement (hip, knee, etc.) No Bone/joint pin, screw, nail, wire, plate, etc. No IUD, diaphragm, or pessary No Dentures or partial plates that can not be removed No Tattoo or permanent makeup No Body piercing jewelry No Claustrophobia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: MediTrain
Device: wrist worn multi-sensor watches
Stress and sleep data will be recorded at home throughout the intervention using FDA-approved wrist worn multi-sensor watches.
Device: MediTrain
MediTrain is a tablet-based, meditation-inspired, cognitive training game aimed at improving self-regulation of internal attention and distractions. It was developed in collaboration with meditation thought-leader Jack Kornfield, and Zynga, a world-class video game company. It was created to make benefits of concentrative meditation more easily accessible to anyone, including complete novices. This is achieved by creating a game that yields quantifiable and attainable goals, provides feedback, and includes an adaptive algorithm to gradually increase difficulty as users improve.
Device: noninvasive neurostimulation device
A noninvasive neurostimulation device will be used to deliver theta frequency stimulation or sham stimulation to the frontal part of the brain.
Experimental: Worder
Device: wrist worn multi-sensor watches
Stress and sleep data will be recorded at home throughout the intervention using FDA-approved wrist worn multi-sensor watches.
Device: noninvasive neurostimulation device
A noninvasive neurostimulation device will be used to deliver theta frequency stimulation or sham stimulation to the frontal part of the brain.
Device: Worder
Worder was designed to enhance visual motor and visual spatial skills in individuals of all ages and cognitive abilities. Visual processing is required for all cognitive abilities that involve vision including attention, working memory, and task management. Worder's goal is to improve cognitive function more broadly by developing this critical skill underlying multiple abilities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change on the Continuous Performance Task (CPT) over time
Time Frame: baseline and immediate follow-up
The CPT is a 23-minute task, where participants are instructed to respond to target stimuli (squares at the top of the screen) and withhold responses to non-target stimuli (squares at the bottom of the screen). Performance will be quantified as: (1) mean reaction times, (2) standard deviation of reaction times (RTV), and (3) d-prime (comparing correct target detections or 'hits' to incorrect non-target detections or 'false alarms').
baseline and immediate follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change in Telomere length
Time Frame: baseline and immediate follow-up
200 mL of blood will be collected from each participant before and after the intervention. Blood will be centrifuged for whole blood cell acquisition and stored at -80 °C for subsequent batch testing. Telomere length (T/S ratio) will be quantified in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
baseline and immediate follow-up
Mean change on a distracted attention task over time
Time Frame: baseline and immediate follow-up
Mean performance on a distracted attention task will be compared pre and post intervention. Divided attention performance will be assessed using the Filter Task that places simultaneous demands on perceptual discrimination abilities and distraction filtering.
baseline and immediate follow-up
Mean Change in Frontal Theta Power over time
Time Frame: baseline and immediate follow-up
Based on previous studies of meditation training and our preliminary data, we predict that MediTrain will lead to significantly enhanced midline frontal theta power during the TOVA in MCI as compared to OA. Beyond most prior studies, by collecting structural MRI data, we will be able to source-localize any observed changes in midline frontal theta.
baseline and immediate follow-up
Mean change in resting state networks over time
Time Frame: baseline and immediate follow-up
We also expect MediTrain will augment intrinsic Default Mode Network (DMN) connectivity, both functionally (measured with resting fMRI111,112) and structurally (measured with DTI-based connectomes). This is hypothesized based on the known association between the DMN
baseline and immediate follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change on the Adaptive Cognitive Evaluation (ACE) over time
Time Frame: baseline and immediate follow-up
The ACE is a mobile cognitive assessment tool, which includes a battery of cognitive control tests for rapid tests of cognition. The sub-tests (or 'modules') in ACE are adapted from standardized tasks to rapidly assess various aspects of cognition, including attention, memory, and multitasking. We will assess response time, accuracy, and response time variability in each case, with faster/more accurate/less variable performance being indicative of improved cognitive control, meditation, and frontal theta power.
baseline and immediate follow-up
Mean change in continuous recordings of sleep and stress metrics.
Time Frame: baseline and immediate follow-up
We will assess time spent in NonREM stages 1 (N1), 2 (N2) and 3 (N3) sleep and REM sleep (RS), latency to sleep onset (SOL), and wake after sleep onset (WASO). We will also assess delta power during sleep stages and wake; and overall sleep maintenance (SM) and sleep efficiency (SE). Diminished time spent in SOL and WASO, increased time N2, N3 and REM sleep, increased delta during NonREM sleep are each signs of improved sleep. Increases in SM and SE indicated improved, more stable sleep patterns. We will measure continuous pulse rate, heart rate variability, respiration, electrodermal activity , and peripheral skin temperature. Reduced amplitude can be indicative of reduced stress over time.
baseline and immediate follow-up
Mean change in Change in Mnemonic Discrimination over time
Time Frame: baseline and immediate follow-up
Mnemonic discrimination task tests recognition memory for common objects, as reported in scores on a scale of the Lure Discrimination Index ranging from 0.00 to 1.00 where higher values show better performance.
baseline and immediate follow-up
Mean change in Task-based Cortical Functional Connectivity
Time Frame: baseline and immediate follow-up
Changes in Task-based Cortical Functional Connectivity Associated With Training-induced Changes in Mnemonic Discrimination will be measured. functional MRI data will be analyzed in terms of beta-series correlations between co-active cortical regions of interest and compared between treatment arms and timepoints.
baseline and immediate follow-up
Mean Change on Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog)
Time Frame: baseline and immediate follow-up
The Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog) measures the ability to perform everyday tasks that demand memory, language, visuospatial abilities, planning, organization, and divided attention. The ECog consists of a global and domain scores for each of the previously described categories, and is scored as follows: 1= better or no change compared to 10 years earlier, 2= questionable/occasionally worse compared to 10 years earlier, 3= consistently a little worse compared to 10 years earlier, 4= consistently much worse compared to 10 years earlier. Thus, the lower the overall score is on this measure at both the global and domain score level, the better one is performing with respect to their cognition.
baseline and immediate follow-up
Mean Change on SF-36 (overall health)
Time Frame: baseline and immediate follow-up
SF-36 (overall health) The general health and well-being (SF-36) score assesses participant health. The SF-36 score ranges from 0 to 100. The higher the overall score is on this measure, the better one is performing with respect to their health and well-being.
baseline and immediate follow-up
Mean Change on Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: baseline and immediate follow-up
Perceived Stress Scale A survey that measures the degree to which situations in one's life are perceived as stressful. Scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores representing more perceived stress. We will report change in means over time.
baseline and immediate follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, San Francisco

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: David Ziegler, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 31, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AG080528
  • R61AG080528 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings