Preoperative Radiation Therapy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction (PRADAIIBE)

February 2, 2026 updated by: Cancer Research Antwerp

Preoperative Radiation Therapy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction, a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial in the Belgian Population

The goal of this phase III randomized controlled trial (PRADAIIBE) is to assess if preoperative radiation therapy (Preop-RT) combined with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) can safely improve both aesthetic and quality of life outcomes in breast cancer patients, compared to the standard of care (SoC) therapy consisting of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) and delayed/immediate breast reconstruction, in a population of breast cancer patients with an indication of mastectomy and PMRT.

The following hypotheses and outcomes will be assessed at the primary endpoint of 1 year of follow-up:

  • Efficacy: Does Preop-RT+IBR lead to a higher BREAST-Q satisfaction with breasts score (primary endpoint), EQ-5D-5L VAS score , EQ-5D-5L Index score, AIS-Total Aesthetic Score, or a shorter treatment duration compared to SoC?
  • Safety: Does Preop-RT+IBR lead to an increase in adverse events (general or surgical), a lower rate of pathologic Complete Response (pCR), or worse survival outcomes compared to SoC? [Note: this study was not powered as a non-inferiority trial, all outcomes will be pooled internationally with parallel studies]

Eligible and consenting participants will undergo screening and baseline assessments. They will then be randomised between experimental (Preop-RT+IBR) and control (SoC) groups, in a 1:1 stratified variable block size design. Follow-up will take place at 3 months, 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after the last study treatment. At baseline and during each follow-up visit each participant will complete the Breast Q 'satisfaction with breasts' and EQ-5D-5L scales, photographs will be taken. During follow-up pCR will be assessed if applicable, adverse events will be registered, and oncological follow-up will be recorded.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The PRADAIIBE study is a multicentric phase III randomized controlled trial, investigating the effects of radiation therapy timing on breast reconstruction results in breast cancer patients.

This study will recruit adult female breast cancer patients from the Belgian population, who have an indication for mastectomy, Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT), and also have a wish for breast reconstruction.

After informed consent is signed, patients will be screened, and included in the study if all eligibility criteria are met. If they are not eligible for participation or choose to withdraw after the ICF was signed, they will be registered as a 'screen failure'.

After study inclusion, baseline assessments take place, this includes two questionnaires, one focussed on patient's satisfaction with their own breasts (BREAST-Q v2, BQ-score), the other one focussed on their quality of life perception (EQ-5D-5L VAS-score and Index-score). Next, four photographs of the exposed breast area will be taken. These photographs will later be assessed by an expert panel (AIS-TAS).

Eligible participants are randomized using the central eCRF randomization tool (Castor EDC). Randomisation is stratified on study site and a variable block size will be used. Resulting in random assignment to one of the following treatment arms:

  • Control (SoC) treatment arm: Mastectomy followed by PMRT and delayed (or immediate) breast reconstruction.
  • Experimental treatment arm: preoperative radiation therapy (preop-RT) followed by mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

Those assigned to the control group will follow the standard of care (SoC) treatment consisting of oncological surgery (within 6 weeks of randomisation or end of preop chemotherapy) followed by radiation therapy (PMRT) within 6-12 weeks. The breast reconstruction surgery will take place either at the same time (e.g. tissue expander implantation) as the oncological surgery, or at a delayed moment (usually a 6-12 months delay).

Patients assigned to the intervention group will receive preop-RT (within 6 weeks of randomisation or end of preop chemotherapy), and after an interval of 2-6 weeks mastectomy combined with immediate breast reconstruction will be performed. The radiation therapy will be administered according to the same principles as PMRT/Whole Breast Radiation Therapy (WBRT). This change to preoperative timing of the radiation therapy allows for immediate breast reconstruction without irradiation of the reconstructed breast.

In the unexpected event of tumour downstaging due to preoperative treatment, changing the indication from mastectomy to breast conserving surgery (BCS), while the patient has already been included, it is allowed within the study protocol to perform BCS. In this case the patient should receive the treatment and surgery which is in their best interest. The same follow-up will be provided. In statistical analysis results from such patients will be handled according to the inter-current events (ICE) strategies defined in the SAP. However, such downstaging is not expected from preop-RT at such a short treatment interval of 2-6 weeks.

Systemic therapy will be administered per standard of care, according to the discretion of the treating medical oncologist. Systemic therapy details will be registered in the eCRF, but it is not considered as part of the study treatments, and will not be manipulated within this trial.

After the treatment period is finished (last study treatment) follow-up will take place at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years. In the control group, patients undergoing delayed breast reconstruction will be invited to an intermediate follow up visit (IMFU) visit at 3 months after conclusion of radiation therapy. The reason for this IMFU visit is to capture the outcomes of interest in the interval between mastectomy and breast reconstruction, as well as provide continued study follow-up during this long treatment interval of +/- 6-12 months.

During each follow-up visit the BREAST-Q and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires will be assessed, photographs will be taken and evaluated at a later (expert panel using the AIS-tool), adverse events will be elicited, pathologic response assessed, treatment milestones are recorded (treatment duration) and oncological recurrence is assessed from the +1 year visit onwards according to the events and outcomes described in the DATECAN 2015 initiative.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
180

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
    • Antwerp
      • Brasschaat, Antwerp, Belgium, 2930
    • Antwerpen
      • Edegem, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2650
        • Recruiting
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen (UZA)
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christophe Van Berckelaer, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Wiebren Tjalma, MD, PhD
      • Wilrijk, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2610
        • Recruiting
        • Ziekenhuis Aan De Stroom
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Melanie Machiels, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tom Quisenaerts, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Philip Poortmans, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Filip Thiessen, MD, PhD
    • Namur
      • Namur, Namur, Belgium, 5000
    • Oost Vlaanderen
      • Ghent, Oost Vlaanderen, Belgium, 9000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent (UZGent)
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bernard Depypere, MD, PhD
    • West Vlaanderen
      • Kortrijk, West Vlaanderen, Belgium, 8500
        • Recruiting
        • AZ Groeninge
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Isabelle Kindts, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Screening assessments, including review of all study eligibility criteria must be completed before enrolment and randomisation.

Inclusion criteria:

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a participant must meet all of the following criteria:

1. Women ≥18 years with histopathologically confirmed breast cancer who:

1.a. require SSM/NSM for any reason (e.g. extensive disease)

1.b. require postoperative radiation therapy of at least the chest wall

  1. c. have a wish for a breast reconstruction
  2. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status grade ≤ 2
  3. Participant is able and willing to provide written informed consent, which includes compliance with and ability to undergo all study procedures, and attend the scheduled follow-up visit(s) per protocol.

Exclusion criteria:

A potential participant who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  1. A previous history of breast cancer or irradiation of the chest wall for any other indication, on the other side (ipsilateral). A bilateral SSM/NSM + reconstruction (e.g. in case of a contralateral prophylactic SSM/NSM), or previous contralateral breast cancer disease/treatment, do not fall under this criterium and are thus allowed.
  2. Collagen synthesis disease
  3. Ongoing pregnancy
  4. Actively breastfeeding
  5. Smoking at time of inclusion (a history of smoking is allowed but needs to be registered in the eCRF). No interval between smoking cessation and study inclusion is defined, but the reconstructive surgeon needs to be willing to operate the patient using autologous tissue transfer. This generally translates to a smoking cessation of >3months preoperatively.
  6. BMI > 35 kg/m2
  7. cT4d tumour, metastatic disease or any reason making SSM/NSM not indicated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Standard treatment arm (SoC; PostOperative RT)

Treatment in this arm consists of:

  1. Mastectomy
  2. Immediate or delayed breast reconstruction.
  3. Postoperative radiation therapy, according to the SoC as indicated by international guidelines.

[Systemic treatments are not considered as study treatments and will be implemented at the discretion of the treating physician.]
Radiation: Postoperative radiotherapy
Standard of care (SoC) postoperative radiotherapy, as defined by international guidelines.
Other Names:
  • ART
  • Adjuvant Radiation Therapy
  • PMRT
  • Postop-RT
  • Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy
Procedure: Immediate or delayed breast reconstruction
In the standard arm of the PRADAIIBE, the participants will undergo immediate or delayed breast reconstruction surgery. This is defined as breast reconstruction taking place at the same time as oncological surgery (immediate), or at a later time (delayed). Using one of the following primary techniques: 1) Autologous tissue reconstruction ; 2) Breast implant based reconstruction; 3) Combined autologous tissue and breast implant reconstruction. These techniques can take place in a single phase, or in a two-phased (tissue expander) approach. Adjuvant techniques (e.g.: lipofilling, mesh, ADM etc.) could be added.
Experimental: Experimental treatment arm (PreOperative RT)

Treatment in this arm consists of:

  1. Preoperative radiation therapy (Preop-RT). Preop-RT will be administered according to the same parameters and quality standards as PMRT/WBRT, as indicated by international guidelines.
  2. Mastectomy combined with immediate breast reconstruction, after a 2-6 weeks interval.

[Systemic treatments are not considered as study treatments and will be implemented at the discretion of the treating physician.]
Radiation: Preoperative radiotherapy

In this study patients assigned to the experimental treatment arm will receive preoperative radiation therapy instead of postoperative radiation therapy (PMRT).

This preoperative radiation therapy will be administered according to the standard of care (SoC) principles for PMRT and Whole Breast Radiation Therapy (WBRT) as defined by international guidelines.

Other Names:
  • NART
  • Preop-RT
  • Neoadjuvant radiation therapy
Procedure: Immediate breast reconstruction

In the experimental arm of the PRADAIIBE, the participants will undergo immediate breast reconstruction surgery. This is defined as breast reconstruction taking place at the same time as oncological surgery. Using one of the following primary techniques: 1) Autologous tissue reconstruction ; 2) Breast implant based reconstruction; 3) Combined autologous tissue and breast implant reconstruction. These techniques can take place in a single phase, or in a two-phased (tissue expander) approach.

Adjuvant techniques (e.g.: lipofilling, mesh, ADM etc.) could be added.

Other Names:
  • IBR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient's satisfaction with breasts.
Time Frame: Measured at 3 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years after last locoregional treatment. Primary endpoint: 1 year after LST.

Operationalisation (measurement variable):

The satisfaction with breasts outcome variable is operationalised through the "satisfaction with breasts" scale from the BREAST-Q (v2) 'Reconstruction', 'Breast Conserving Treatment', or 'Mastectomy' modules (as applicable). The answers from the questionnaire are then transformed into a 'BREAST-Q Score', using the provided conversion scales.(3) The BREAST-Q score can range from 0 to100.

Analysis metric:

The transformed value of the BREAST-Q score will be used for analysis.

Method of aggregation:

Mean, SD, median, IQR, and range will be reported. For comparisons and estimands, please refer to the SAP.
Measured at 3 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years after last locoregional treatment. Primary endpoint: 1 year after LST.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L VAS score)
Time Frame: A baseline assessment is performed during the screening visit, followed by repeated measurements during the IMFU (if applicable), 3M, 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y follow-up visits.

Operationalisation (measurement variable):

'Quality of Life' will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Deriving the VAS-score from the VAS-scale Range EQ-5D-5L VAS-score: 0-100

Analysis metric:

The VAS-score will be used as recorded.

Method of aggregation:

Mean, SD, median, IQR, and range will be reported. For comparisons and estimands, please refer
A baseline assessment is performed during the screening visit, followed by repeated measurements during the IMFU (if applicable), 3M, 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y follow-up visits.
Quality of Life (Index score)
Time Frame: A baseline assessment is performed during the screening visit, followed by repeated measurements during the IMFU (if applicable), 3M, 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y follow-up visits.

Operationalisation (measurement variable):

'Quality of Life' will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The index score is calculated from the Likert-scale answers, using a formula validated in the Belgian population.

Range EQ-5D-5L Index-score: -0.533-0.962.

Analysis metric:

The Index-score will be transformed to a scale between 0 and 1, proportional to its original distribution using the following formula:

F(IS) = (IS+0.533)/1.495 The rationale for this transformation, is to adhere to the scale proposed by the EQ-5D-5L documentation, and improve interpretability.

Method of aggregation:

Mean, SD, median, IQR, and range will be reported. For comparisons and estimands, please refer
A baseline assessment is performed during the screening visit, followed by repeated measurements during the IMFU (if applicable), 3M, 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y follow-up visits.
Breast cosmesis, objective assessment (AIS - TAS)
Time Frame: Photographs are taken during the screening visit, followed by repeated photographs during the IMFU (if applicable), 3M, 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y follow-up visits. Expert panel assessment will take place at a later moment.

Operationalisation (measurement variable):

Breast cosmesis will be assessed through a blinded panel of experts, using the 'Aesthetic Items Scale' to score a set of photographs taken during study visits. This set will consist of 4 2D digital photographs. The AIS has 5 items, each are scored from 1 to 5. These items are then summed to derive the 'Total Aesthetic Score' (TAS). The TAS can range from 5 to 25.

Analysis metric:

The derived value of the Total Aesthetic Score (TAS) from each assessor will be averaged to derive the TAS of each set of photos.

Method of aggregation:

Mean, SD, median, IQR, and range will be reported. For comparisons and estimands, please refer to the SAP.
Photographs are taken during the screening visit, followed by repeated photographs during the IMFU (if applicable), 3M, 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y follow-up visits. Expert panel assessment will take place at a later moment.
Frequency and severity of adverse events (General AEs)
Time Frame: AEs will be assessed and recorded continuously, with explicit querying during all follow-up visits.

During the study all adverse events (AEs) codes and grades will be recorded in the eCRF, based on the 'National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events' (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0 reporting system.

Analysis metric:

Tabulation of AE frequency, type and severity. As well as the highest grade AE for each participant.

Method of aggregation:

AEs will be aggregated based on their grades. Two composite measures will be reported, consisting of 1) any AE vs. no AE, and 2) grade > 3 AEs vs. no or grade <3 AEs. Tables presenting both frequency and proportions of each grade and the composite measures will be presented. Proportions will be reported as AEs compared to 'highest grade per patient', and to 'total set of AEs'. For comparisons and estimands, please refer to the SAP.
AEs will be assessed and recorded continuously, with explicit querying during all follow-up visits.
Frequency and severity of adverse events (Surgical AEs)
Time Frame: AEs will be assessed and recorded continuously, with explicit querying during all follow-up visits.

During the study all adverse events (AEs) codes and grades will be recorded in the eCRF, based on the 'National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events' (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0 reporting system. ). The relationship to surgical study interventions will be registered in the eCRF.

Analysis metric:

Tabulation of surgical AE frequency, type and severity. As well as the highest grade surgical AE for each participant.

Method of aggregation:

Surgical AEs will be aggregated based on their grades. Two composite measures will be reported, consisting of 1) any AE vs. no AE, and 2) grade > 3 AEs vs. no or grade <3 AEs, relating to surgical AEs. Tables presenting both frequency and proportions of each grade and composite measures will be presented. Proportions will be reported as surgical AEs compared to 'highest grade per patient', and to 'total set of surgical AEs'. For comparisons and estimands, please refer to the SAP.
AEs will be assessed and recorded continuously, with explicit querying during all follow-up visits.
Treatment duration
Time Frame: These outcome variables will be continuously recorded as the participant progresses through the study and the data is entered in the eCRF.

Operationalisation (measurement variable):

The dates of diagnostic, study, and treatment milestones will be recorded in the eCRF. Time intervals expressed in days, will be assessed for:

  • Randomisation to last study treatment (LST)
  • Randomisation to oncological breast surgery
  • Oncological breast surgery to last study treatment (LST)

Analysis metric:

The 'randomisation to last study treatment (LST)' time interval, expressed in days.

Method of aggregation:

KM-estimates and derived estimates for central tendency and spread will be provided. For comparisons and estimands, please refer to the SAP
These outcome variables will be continuously recorded as the participant progresses through the study and the data is entered in the eCRF.
Pathological complete response rate (pCR)
Time Frame: This outcome variable will be assessed after the pathology report of the removed breast tissues is available. This is checked intermittently during the treatment phase, or at least during the 3 months follow-up visit.

Operationalisation (measurement variable):

Patients receiving preoperative therapy undergo pathological response assessment of the removed breast tissues (SoC assessment). The reported response Pinder-classification or 'No preoperative therapy' will be recorded in the eCRF.

Analysis metric:

The response category as described in the pathology report will be recorded for all participants, but this outcome will only be assessed in participants receiving preoperative-systemic therapy (with, or without Preop-RT).

This is due to the fact that no response is expected at 2-6 weeks after radiation therapy monotherapy, which would result in an unfair comparison.

Both this subset of the ITT set, and the complete safety set will be used in the safety assessment, as described in the SAP.

Method of aggregation:

The frequency and proportion of the response categories will be presented in a table. For comparisons and estimands, please refer to the SAP.
This outcome variable will be assessed after the pathology report of the removed breast tissues is available. This is checked intermittently during the treatment phase, or at least during the 3 months follow-up visit.

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oncological survival and time-to-event data
Time Frame: Oncological TTE data will be registered at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of follow-up after the last study treatment (LST). However, the exact dates of diagnosis/death will be used.

Operationalisation (measurement variable):

The oncological survival and TTE data are operationalised as time-to-event intervals for the events of interest listed below. These events are recorded according to the 2015 DATECAN consensus.

The following TTE/survival metrics will be reported according to the 2015 DATECAN consensus: Overall Survival (OS), Breast Cancer-Specific Survival (BCSS), Relapse-Free Survival (RFS), Locoregional Relapse-Free Survival (L-RFS), and Distant-Relapse Free Survival (D-RFS).

Analysis metric:

The TTE data is registered in days from randomisation (Rz). Censoring will be used for participants without events at the end of their follow up.

Method of aggregation:

KM-estimates with derived estimates for central tendency and spread, as well as proportions free from events at follow-up visit timepoints will be reported. The non-aggregated data will be used for survival analysis. For comparisons and estimands, please refer to the SAP.
Oncological TTE data will be registered at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of follow-up after the last study treatment (LST). However, the exact dates of diagnosis/death will be used.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cancer Research Antwerp

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Ziekenhuis aan de Stroom
Iridium netwerk

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Melanie Machiels, MD, PhD, Iridium netwerk

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 20, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 20, 2038

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 2, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CTO23023GZA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All data generated during this study will be anonymised and then shared with the UK based PRADA-consortium and the Dutch BRENAR study (parallel pilot study).

This PRADA-consortium oversees the organisation of similar trials in other countries, with the goal of publishing the results from these international studies as pooled data in order to increase the sample size and thereby the statistical power of the conclusions.

Special care will be taken to anonymise all personal data and to adhere with both Belgian and European data protection and privacy laws (GDPR).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be shared after assessment of the primary endpoint, and subsequently at an interval in accordance with the further follow-up visits.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to the finalised database can be requested after primary endpoint assessment. Requests will be handled on a case-by-case basis. Data will only be shared for scientific purposes, and is only permitted after ethical commission approval, and DTA signing.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Postoperative radiotherapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings