Postoperative Pain in Endodontic Therapy
The Effect of Different Irrigation Activation Methods Preferred During Root Canal Treatment On Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the change in postoperative pain in mandibular premolar and first molar teeth with asymptomatic apical periodontitis when using EDDY and passive ultrasonic irrigation activation methods.
The null hypothesis is: "There is no difference in postoperative pain after root canal treatment between the irrigation activation systems in mandibular first molars and premolar teeth."
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Karadeniz
-
Ordu, Karadeniz, Turkey, 52200
- Ordu University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged between 18 and 55 years, medically healthy, and free from systemic diseases.
- Patients without pregnancy or breastfeeding status.
- Patients diagnosed with asymptomatic apical periodontitis confirmed through radiographic and clinical examination.
- Patients not having a regular intake of analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs within the last 12 hours.
- Patients lacking a history of drug allergies.
- Teeth free from calcifications, resorptions, periodontal problems, incomplete root development, a history of endodontic treatment, traumatic occlusion, or severe coronal destruction.
- Teeth with a root canal curvature of 5° or less.
- Mandibular premolars and first molars.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Teeth where the apical area could not be reached with a #8K file.
- Teeth with an apical diameter larger than #20K file.
- Patients with a Periapical Index (PAI) score of 1 or 2.
- Teeth having extra canals.
- Teeth requiring a second local anesthesia during treatment.
- Teeth where a file fractured within the canal during preparation.
- Vital teeth.
- Patients reporting preoperative pain.
- Teeth showing clinical symptoms such as percussion or palpation sensitivity.
- Teeth with persistent purulent discharge.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: EDDY Group
The effect of the EDDY device, preferred for root canal irrigation activation, on postoperative pain formation
|
The EDDY activation of the irrigation solutions used is performed to achieve root canal disinfection and enhance antibacterial effectiveness once the root canal preparation is completed.
|
|
Experimental: PUI Group
The effect of the passive ultrasonic activation method, preferred for root canal irrigation activation, on postoperative pain formation
|
The passive ultrasonic activation of the irrigation solutions used is performed to achieve root canal disinfection and enhance antibacterial effectiveness once the root canal preparation is completed.
|
|
No Intervention: Control Group
Root canal treatment performed with conventional irrigation without the use of any activation method
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 8th hour
|
Prior to treatment, patients were instructed in detail on how to complete the VAS (Visual Analog Scale).
Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on a 10 cm line based on the severity of pain experienced after the procedure.
Pain intensity was numerically documented on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is described as no pain number, 10 is described as the highest pain number.
|
8th hour
|
|
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 12th hour
|
Prior to treatment, patients were instructed in detail on how to complete the VAS (Visual Analog Scale).
Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on a 10 cm line based on the severity of pain experienced after the procedure.
Pain intensity was numerically documented on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is described as no pain number, 10 is described as the highest pain number.
|
12th hour
|
|
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 24th hour
|
Prior to treatment, patients were instructed in detail on how to complete the VAS (Visual Analog Scale).
Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on a 10 cm line based on the severity of pain experienced after the procedure.
Pain intensity was numerically documented on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is described as no pain number, 10 is described as the highest pain number.
|
24th hour
|
|
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 48th hour
|
Prior to treatment, patients were instructed in detail on how to complete the VAS (Visual Analog Scale).
Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on a 10 cm line based on the severity of pain experienced after the procedure.
Pain intensity was numerically documented on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is described as no pain number, 10 is described as the highest pain number.
|
48th hour
|
|
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 7th day
|
Prior to treatment, patients were instructed in detail on how to complete the VAS (Visual Analog Scale).
Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on a 10 cm line based on the severity of pain experienced after the procedure.
Pain intensity was numerically documented on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is described as no pain number, 10 is described as the highest pain number.
|
7th day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Seca MUTLU, Ordu University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ODU-MUTLU-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.