Postoperative Pain in Endodontic Therapy

December 17, 2024 updated by: Seca MUTLU, T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ

The Effect of Different Irrigation Activation Methods Preferred During Root Canal Treatment On Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the change in postoperative pain in mandibular premolar and first molar teeth with asymptomatic apical periodontitis when using EDDY and passive ultrasonic irrigation activation methods.

The null hypothesis is: "There is no difference in postoperative pain after root canal treatment between the irrigation activation systems in mandibular first molars and premolar teeth."

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

57

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Karadeniz
      • Ordu, Karadeniz, Turkey, 52200
        • Ordu University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged between 18 and 55 years, medically healthy, and free from systemic diseases.
  • Patients without pregnancy or breastfeeding status.
  • Patients diagnosed with asymptomatic apical periodontitis confirmed through radiographic and clinical examination.
  • Patients not having a regular intake of analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs within the last 12 hours.
  • Patients lacking a history of drug allergies.
  • Teeth free from calcifications, resorptions, periodontal problems, incomplete root development, a history of endodontic treatment, traumatic occlusion, or severe coronal destruction.
  • Teeth with a root canal curvature of 5° or less.
  • Mandibular premolars and first molars.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Teeth where the apical area could not be reached with a #8K file.
  • Teeth with an apical diameter larger than #20K file.
  • Patients with a Periapical Index (PAI) score of 1 or 2.
  • Teeth having extra canals.
  • Teeth requiring a second local anesthesia during treatment.
  • Teeth where a file fractured within the canal during preparation.
  • Vital teeth.
  • Patients reporting preoperative pain.
  • Teeth showing clinical symptoms such as percussion or palpation sensitivity.
  • Teeth with persistent purulent discharge.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EDDY Group
The effect of the EDDY device, preferred for root canal irrigation activation, on postoperative pain formation
The EDDY activation of the irrigation solutions used is performed to achieve root canal disinfection and enhance antibacterial effectiveness once the root canal preparation is completed.
Experimental: PUI Group
The effect of the passive ultrasonic activation method, preferred for root canal irrigation activation, on postoperative pain formation
The passive ultrasonic activation of the irrigation solutions used is performed to achieve root canal disinfection and enhance antibacterial effectiveness once the root canal preparation is completed.
No Intervention: Control Group
Root canal treatment performed with conventional irrigation without the use of any activation method

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 8th hour
Prior to treatment, patients were instructed in detail on how to complete the VAS (Visual Analog Scale). Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on a 10 cm line based on the severity of pain experienced after the procedure. Pain intensity was numerically documented on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is described as no pain number, 10 is described as the highest pain number.
8th hour
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 12th hour
Prior to treatment, patients were instructed in detail on how to complete the VAS (Visual Analog Scale). Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on a 10 cm line based on the severity of pain experienced after the procedure. Pain intensity was numerically documented on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is described as no pain number, 10 is described as the highest pain number.
12th hour
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 24th hour
Prior to treatment, patients were instructed in detail on how to complete the VAS (Visual Analog Scale). Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on a 10 cm line based on the severity of pain experienced after the procedure. Pain intensity was numerically documented on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is described as no pain number, 10 is described as the highest pain number.
24th hour
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 48th hour
Prior to treatment, patients were instructed in detail on how to complete the VAS (Visual Analog Scale). Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on a 10 cm line based on the severity of pain experienced after the procedure. Pain intensity was numerically documented on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is described as no pain number, 10 is described as the highest pain number.
48th hour
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 7th day
Prior to treatment, patients were instructed in detail on how to complete the VAS (Visual Analog Scale). Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on a 10 cm line based on the severity of pain experienced after the procedure. Pain intensity was numerically documented on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is described as no pain number, 10 is described as the highest pain number.
7th day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Seca MUTLU, Ordu University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 4, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on EDDY Group

Subscribe