EXACERBATIONS AND REAL-WORLD OUTOMES INCLUDING CARDIOPULMONARY EVENTS AMONG PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (MITOS: EROS+CP US Study) (EROS+CP (US))

August 4, 2025 updated by: AstraZeneca

EXACERBATIONS AND REAL-WORLD OUTOMES INCLUDING CARDIOPULMONARY EVENTS AMONG PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE INITIATING BUDESONIDE/GLYCOPYRRONIUM/FORMOTEROL (MITOS: EROS+CP US Study)

A retrospective real-world data study, assessing the relationship between the timing of Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol initiation following an exacerbation and the occurrence of subsequent exacerbations, severe cardiopulmonary events and other real-world outcomes in the United States

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
13000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Delaware
      • Wilmington, Delaware, United States, 19803
        • AstraZeneca

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The overall sample will include adult (aged 40+) COPD patients who have experienced a qualifying COPD exacerbation and eventually received treatment with BGF. Patients should not have prior single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) use during the 12-month period-baseline prior to the qualifying index exacerbation and prior to initiating BGF treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1 prescription(s) fill for BGF on or following July 24, 2020 (date of BGF approval in the United States)

    • Patients must have evidence a qualifying exacerbation events which, per local or global guidelines, would qualify a patient to have treatment escalated or initiated to triple therapy. The qualifying exacerbation event must occur within the 12-month period preceding the initiation of BGF but occurring on or following local BGF commercial availability (July 24, 2020) and includes either of the following
  • 12 months of continuous health plan enrollment preceding the qualifying index exacerbation event date ('baseline' period)

  • 1 day of continuous enrollment following the qualifying index exacerbation date

    • Age ≥ 40 years on the qualifying index exacerbation event

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of cancer diagnoses other than basal or squamous cell skin cancer during the baseline or follow-up periods
  • Presence of interstitial fibrosis, sarcoidosis, or pulmonary embolism diagnoses during the baseline or follow-up periods
  • Presence of triple therapy SITT during the baseline period through BGF initiation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Prompt
PATIENTS INITIATING BGF WITHIN 30-DAYS OF EXACERBATION
Drug: BGF
BUDESONIDE/GLYCOPYRRONIUM/FORMOTEROL
Other Names:
  • BREZTRI
DELAYED
PATIENTS INITIATING BGF WITHIN 31-180 DAYS OF EXACERBATION
Drug: BGF
BUDESONIDE/GLYCOPYRRONIUM/FORMOTEROL
Other Names:
  • BREZTRI
VERY DELAYED
PATIENTS INITIATING BGF WITHIN 181-365 DAYS OF EXACERBATION
Drug: BGF
BUDESONIDE/GLYCOPYRRONIUM/FORMOTEROL
Other Names:
  • BREZTRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annualized COPD Exacerbation Event Rate
Time Frame: Annualized rates from index exacerbation through end of data availability, mean follow-up 462 days
Annualized rates of COPD exacerbation events observed from index date (qualifying exacerbation event) through study completion (or until end of data availability; mean follow-up 462 days
Annualized rates from index exacerbation through end of data availability, mean follow-up 462 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annualized Cardiopulmonary Event Rate
Time Frame: Annualized rates from index exacerbation through end of data availability; mean follow-up 462 days
Annualized rates of cardiopulmonary events observed from index date (qualifying exacerbation event) through study completion (until end of data availability)
Annualized rates from index exacerbation through end of data availability; mean follow-up 462 days

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annualized rate of all-cause mortality
Time Frame: Annualized incidence of mortality during follow-up period until end of data availability; mean follow-up 462 days
Annualized incidence of all-cause mortality observed from index date (qualifying exacerbation event) through study completion (until end of data availability; mean follow-up 462 days
Annualized incidence of mortality during follow-up period until end of data availability; mean follow-up 462 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Michael Pollack, MS, AstraZeneca

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 31, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 7, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 4, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D5980R00095

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings