Comparison of Transfemoral Amputees in Different Prosthesis Use Periods
Comparison of Posture, Balance, Gait and Plantar Pressure Parameters of Transfemoral Amputees in Different Prosthesis Use Periods
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Sogutozu
-
Ankara, Sogutozu, Turkey, 06530
- Lokman Hekim University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- To be using unilateral hydraulic knee joint and carbon foot prosthesis.
- Being amputee at the transfemoral level
- Being new or using prosthesis for at least 3 years.
- Having undergone amputation due to trauma.
- To have completed prosthetic period rehabilitation.
- To be between the ages of 18-45
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having a wound-ulcer problem
- Having amputation due to diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, tumour or venous insufficiency
- Being diagnosed with any systemic or neurological disease
- Affected perception and cognition
- Body mass index above 30.
- Having lower extremity contracture
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Transfemoral amputee group using prosthesis for at least 3 years
|
Plantar pressure, gait and static balance analysis performed using Ultium Insole SmartLead insoles.
Trunk posture analysis was performed using Diers Formetric 4D.
|
|
New transfemoral amputee group using prosthesis between two and six weeks
|
Plantar pressure, gait and static balance analysis performed using Ultium Insole SmartLead insoles.
Trunk posture analysis was performed using Diers Formetric 4D.
|
|
Healthy adult group
|
Plantar pressure, gait and static balance analysis performed using Ultium Insole SmartLead insoles.
Trunk posture analysis was performed using Diers Formetric 4D.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Plantar pressure analysis
Time Frame: Baseline
|
It was evaluated using the insoles of the Ultium Insole SmartLead.
This system is compatible with the Ultium EMG system and can be used in a portable laboratory environment.
It is also capable of providing users with zoned and total normalised load-time curves.
In addition, it provides users with data such as 3D pressure animations and pressure centre, enabling a more detailed analysis of load distribution.
These features make load distribution analysis for clinical or research purposes more effective and user-friendly.
It also provides the possibility to monitor relative load distribution during balancing and bilateral or unilateral exercise applications.
Applications of this technology include static and dynamic load imbalance detection, and body sway analysis.
|
Baseline
|
|
Gait analysis
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Duration-distance characteristics of gait were evaluated using Ultium Insole SmartLead insoles.
This system is compatible with the Ultium EMG system and can be used in a portable laboratory environment.
It enables contact detection and quantitative analysis in walking, running and other dynamic activities.
Applications of this technology include gait analysis, and running analysis.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Trunk posture analysis
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Evaluated with the DIERS Formetric 4D Analysis System.
The system offers the ability to perform fast and radiation-free static and dynamic (functional) optical measurements of the human spine.
This system works without contact and can objectively analyse spinal posture, scoliosis and other spinal deformities with various clinical parameters.
|
Baseline
|
|
Fear of falling
Time Frame: Baseline
|
It was assessed with the International Falls Efficacy Scale (FES-I): Fear of falling can reduce a person's quality of life and lead to a range of negative consequences, including psychological distress, increased medication use, activity limitations, decreased physical functioning, increased risk of falls, and the need for institutional care.
The FES measures confidence in performing activities of daily living without falling.
This scale has an excellent performance in terms of reliability and is correlated with balance and gait measures.
It is also known for its ability to predict future falls and decline in functional capacity.
The FES-I is a scale used to assess fear of falling and was developed as an international version of the Falls Efficacy Scale.
The FES-I is used to assess individuals' fear of falling and their confidence in performing daily activities.
The FES-I is frequently used by health professionals to determine fear of falling and to assess the need for intervention.
|
Baseline
|
|
Body image
Time Frame: Baseline
|
It was evaluated with the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS).
The scale is recognised as an important tool in the process of understanding and improving the body image of amputees.
It was developed to assess the body experiences of amputees.
The ABIS contains 20 items and measures the perceptions and feelings of the person about his/her body after amputation.
During its development, important psychometric properties such as content validity, internal consistency and validity were found acceptable.
|
Baseline
|
|
Satisfaction level
Time Frame: Baseline
|
It was evaluated with the Prosthesis Satisfaction Questionnaire.
This questionnaire assesses the satisfaction of amputees with their prostheses.
The questionnaire consists of 15 questions, and for each question, the participants tick one of the following options: 3: completely agree, 2: strongly agree, 1: disagree, 0: strongly disagree and receive the appropriate score.
The total score ranges from 0 to 45, with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction.
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023187
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.