RTMS for CHR Based on Personalized Targets Using Magnetoencephalography

February 9, 2025 updated by: Shanghai Mental Health Center

RTMS for Clinical High-risk Syndrome of Psychosis Based on Personalized Targets Using Magnetoencephalography

This study is an before-after study in the same subject, which enrolled 26 individuals with high-risk psychiatric syndrome (CHR). The target of subjects intervention relies on the results of magnetoencephalography localization. The medication and dosage remain unchanged during the intervention period or not yet taking antipsychotic medication. The investigators assume that the intervention targets for each CHR subject are individualized.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is divided into two parts:

  1. Target determination. Firstly, MEG data of the subject's resting and task states are collected, and a precise localization model using magnetoencephalography is applied to locate the precise location of the subject's abnormal signals in the brain, which is then used as the intervention target. Based on the subject's tolerance for single day intervention, the appropriate number of targets is generally 2-4. The upper limit of targets is 4.
  2. RTMS individualized intervention. Application of rTMS for 1Hz low-frequency intervention, with intervention parameters of 1400 sessions, 100% exercise threshold, and a total of 23 minutes per session. After each target intervention, rest for half an hour to one hour. The pseudo stimulation intervention lasted for 10 days in the first and second weeks, and the scale was evaluated after the end of the pseudo stimulation. After resting for 2 weeks, enter the 3-4 weeks of real stimulation, with 5 days of intervention per week for a total of 10 days. 2-4 targets per day, 23 minutes per target, with 30-60 minutes between interventions for each target. After the fourth week, evaluate the scale. Follow up evaluations will be conducted on the 7th, 14th, 30th, 60th, and 90th day after intervention. By analyzing and evaluating data, explore individualized treatment plans for CHR in clinical practice.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
26

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Shanghai, China, 200030
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Mental Health Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of Clinical High-Risk Syndrome for Psychosis
  • Must be able to right-handed
  • Primary school education or above
  • Understand and sign a written informed consent form (jointly signed by the guardian and the participant if under 18 years old)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major physical illnesses (organic lesions such as sensory and motor disorders, neurological disorders, and traumatic brain injury)
  • Taboo symptoms for rTMS treatment (such as intracranial metal implants)
  • Metal (including orthodontic treatment, dental implants) and tattoos inside the body
  • Claustrophobia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Physical intervention for before-after study in the same subject with CHR
Pseudo stimulus intervention in weeks 1-2, for a total of 10 days. After resting for 2 weeks, enter the 3-4 weeks of real stimulation, with 5 days of intervention per week for a total of 10 days.
Device: rTMS
RTMS using pseudo stimulus intervention in weeks 1-2, for a total of 10 days. After resting for 2 weeks, enter the 3-4 weeks of real stimulation, with 5 days of intervention per week for a total of 10 days. Application of rTMS for 1Hz low-frequency intervention, with intervention parameters of 1400 sessions, 100% exercise threshold, and a total of 23 minutes per session. After each target intervention, rest for half an hour to one hour.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction rate of the SIPS/SOPS scale
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of the 2-week pseudostimulation treatment. From 2 weeks rest after the end of pseudostimulation treatment to the end of 2 weeks of true stimulation treatment.
SIPS/SOPS (Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes/Scale of Psychosis-Risk Symptoms) is a scale used to assess subjects' structural interviews on prodromal symptoms of psychosis. The SIPS/SOPS scales, due to their inclusion of multiple assessment items with potentially varying scores for each, do not allow for a straightforward determination of an overall minimum and maximum value. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms in the assessed individual, while a lower score suggests less severe symptoms.
From enrolment to the end of the 2-week pseudostimulation treatment. From 2 weeks rest after the end of pseudostimulation treatment to the end of 2 weeks of true stimulation treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction rate of the PNASS scale
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of the 2-week pseudostimulation treatment. From 2 weeks rest after the end of pseudostimulation treatment to the end of 2 weeks of true stimulation treatment.
PNASS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) is a scale for evaluating Psychiatric disorders. Each item is scored on a scale from 1 to 7, with 1 being the lowest score and 7 being the highest. Therefore, the minimum possible score on the PANSS is 30, and the maximum is 210. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms.
From enrolment to the end of the 2-week pseudostimulation treatment. From 2 weeks rest after the end of pseudostimulation treatment to the end of 2 weeks of true stimulation treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Mental Health Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 7, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 9, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MEG-CHR-2024

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

All research data sharing related to humans requires hospital approval.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings