A Clinical Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Two Surgical Pathways for Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy

July 14, 2026 updated by: The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

A Single Center, Randomized, Single Blind, Parallel Controlled Clinical Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Two Surgical Pathways for Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary strategy to improve perioperative outcomes and accelerate patient recovery. This study aims to compare ERAS-related and perioperative outcomes between multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) in patients undergoing total hysterectomy for benign or premalignant uterine diseases.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary strategy to improve perioperative outcomes and accelerate patient recovery. This study aims to compare ERAS-related and perioperative outcomes between multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) in patients undergoing total hysterectomy for benign or premalignant uterine diseases. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to undergo MPLS or TU-LESS. The primary outcome is the 24-hour postoperative comprehensive ERAS compliance rate. Secondary outcomes include operative time, postoperative hemoglobin, intraoperative estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, time to first flatus, 24-hour postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, rate of successful voiding following urinary catheter removal, and 3-month patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) scores.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
312

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Jiangsu
      • Suzhou, Jiangsu, China, 215000
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age ≥ 18 years;
  2. an indication for total hysterectomy, including leiomyoma, adenomyosis, abnormal uterine bleeding, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasm (EIN);
  3. and a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of both TU-LESS and MPLS surgical approaches, willingness to undergo either procedure, and provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. concomitant vulvar, vaginal, or appendiceal pathologies requiring concurrent surgical intervention;
  2. confirmed or suspected invasive malignancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (TU-LESS) Group
Patients undergoing total hysterectomy via transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) under standardized ERAS protocol. Perioperative management follows the same ERAS pathway as the comparator group.
Procedure: Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery
Total hysterectomy performed through a single incision made at the umbilicus, using specialized single-port access devices.
Active Comparator: Multi-Port Laparoscopic Surgery (MPLS) Group
Patients undergoing total hysterectomy via conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) under standardized ERAS protocol. This serves as the active control representing current standard surgical practice.
Procedure: Multi-Port Laparoscopic Surgery
Total hysterectomy performed through 3 to 4 small incisions in the abdomen, using conventional laparoscopic instruments and ports.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comprehensive ERAS Achievement Rate at 24 Hours Postoperatively
Time Frame: Within 24 hours postoperatively
The proportion of patients achieving all five predefined ERAS criteria simultaneously within 24 hours post-surgery: (1) oral liquid intake tolerated; (2) first flatus passed; (3) spontaneous urination after catheter removal; (4) ambulation; and (5) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score ≤ 3. Failure to meet any single criterion within 24 hours is defined as non-achievement. This is a composite primary outcome measure.
Within 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Hemoglobin Level
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1
Hemoglobin concentration measured on the first postoperative morning (Day 1).
Postoperative Day 1
Hemoglobin Decrease
Time Frame: From baseline to Postoperative Day 1
Calculated as preoperative hemoglobin minus postoperative Day 1 hemoglobin.
From baseline to Postoperative Day 1
Estimated Blood Loss (EBL)
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative blood loss volume estimated by the attending surgeon.
Intraoperative
Blood Transfusion Rate
Time Frame: Intraoperative to 7 days postoperatively
Proportion of patients receiving allogeneic or autologous blood transfusion during or after surgery.
Intraoperative to 7 days postoperatively
Time to First Flatus
Time Frame: From end of surgery to event (within 7 days)
Time interval from the end of surgery to the first passage of flatus.
From end of surgery to event (within 7 days)
Rate of successful voiding following urinary catheter removal
Time Frame: From catheter removal to event (within 7 days)
Rate of successful voiding following urinary catheter removal
From catheter removal to event (within 7 days)
24-Hour Postoperative VAS Pain Score
Time Frame: At 24 hours postoperatively
Pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (0-10 cm, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain) at 24 hours postoperatively.
At 24 hours postoperatively
Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS)
Time Frame: At 3 months postoperatively
Patient-reported scar evaluation using the PSAS component of the POSAS, assessing six items: pain, itchiness, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity. Each item scored 1-10. Total score ranges 6-60 (higher = worse scar).
At 3 months postoperatively
Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS)
Time Frame: At 3 months postoperatively
Clinician-rated scar evaluation using the OSAS component of the POSAS, assessing six items: vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area. Each item scored 1-10. Total score ranges 6-60 (higher = worse scar).
At 3 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 5, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 14, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2024105 (South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings