Oral Ketorolac for IUD Pain Reduction
Timing of Oral Ketorolac for Pain Reduction in IUD Insertion: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Adam D Elwood, M.D.
- Phone Number: 910-683-0178
- Email: u392505@unch.unc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Amy G Bryant, M.D.
- Phone Number: 919-962-4880
- Email: amy_bryant@med.unc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Hillsborough, North Carolina, United States, 27278
- University of North Carolina - Hillsborough Campus
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older
- Able to consent
- Desires IUD insertion
Exclusion Criteria:
- IUD placement under sedation or oral anxiolytic
- IUD replacement (removal with insertion)
- Daily narcotic or NSAID use
- Contraindications to IUD placement
- Current: pregnancy, genital/pelvic infection
- Lifetime history: uterine anomaly, pelvic inflammatory disease, allergy to levonorgestrel or copper
- Contraindications to ketorolac
- Current: weight under 50 kilograms
- Lifetime history: allergy to NSAIDs, liver disease, renal disease, peptic ulcer disease, cerebrovascular bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: K2 - Ketorolac 2-hour
Receives Ketorolac 20mg PO at 2 hours prior and placebo at 1 hour prior to IUD
|
The experimental condition to be examined by this study is the timing of administration of ketorolac prior to IUD insertion.
Ketorolac 20mg PO has proven beneficial at certain timepoints during IUD insertion in prior studies, but pharmacokinetics indicate that it could require more time until peak analgesia.
Other Names:
Placebo will be used to control the timing of administration and be used to compare ketorolac to baseline standard pain control regimens
|
|
Active Comparator: K1 - Ketorolac 1-hour
Receives placebo at 2 hours and Ketorolac 20mg PO at 1 hour prior to IUD
|
The experimental condition to be examined by this study is the timing of administration of ketorolac prior to IUD insertion.
Ketorolac 20mg PO has proven beneficial at certain timepoints during IUD insertion in prior studies, but pharmacokinetics indicate that it could require more time until peak analgesia.
Other Names:
Placebo will be used to control the timing of administration and be used to compare ketorolac to baseline standard pain control regimens
|
|
Placebo Comparator: K0 - Placebo control
Receives placebo at 2 hours and at 1 hour prior to IUD
|
Placebo will be used to control the timing of administration and be used to compare ketorolac to baseline standard pain control regimens
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in mean VAS pain scores between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion
Time Frame: All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
|
To compare the mean VAS pain scores between study arms (K2 vs K1 vs K0) at each timepoint during and after IUD insertion (pre-procedure, tenaculum placement, PCB injection, uterine sounding, IUD deployment, overall (measured immediately post-procedure), and 10 minutes post-procedure).
To assess VAS scores, a 100mm ruler will be presented to the patient at the listed timepoints.
The patient will adjust a slider on the ruler to correspond to their pain level, with 0mm representing no pain and 100mm representing worst possible pain.
The VAS scores will be reported as means and compared via repeated measure ANOVA test yielding confidence intervals and p-values and to assess for significance.
|
All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in mean VAS pain scores between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion, controlling for parity
Time Frame: Parity is recorded during intake 1 week prior to IUD. VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
|
To compare the mean VAS pain scores between study arms (K2 vs K1 vs K0) at each timepoint during and after IUD insertion (pre-procedure, tenaculum placement, PCB injection, uterine sounding, IUD deployment, overall (measured immediately post-procedure), and 10 minutes post-procedure) with respect to parity.
To assess VAS scores, a 100mm ruler will be presented to the patient at the listed timepoints.
The patient will adjust a slider on the ruler to correspond to their pain level, with 0mm representing no pain and 100mm representing worst possible pain.
This will determine if nulliparous patients experienced more pain relief with different timings of ketorolac administration.
The VAS scores for nulliparous and multiparous patients will be reported as means and compared via repeated measure ANOVA test with interaction term yielding confidence intervals and p-values to assess for significance.
|
Parity is recorded during intake 1 week prior to IUD. VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
|
|
Difference in rate of "severe pain" (VAS pain scores 70-100mm) between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion
Time Frame: All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
|
To compare the rate of "severe pain" (VAS pain scores 70-100mm) between study arms (K2 vs K1 vs K0) at each timepoint during and after IUD insertion (pre-procedure, tenaculum placement, PCB injection, uterine sounding, IUD deployment, overall (measured immediately post-procedure), and 10 minutes post-procedure).
To assess VAS scores, a 100mm ruler will be presented to the patient at the listed timepoints.
The patient will adjust a slider on the ruler to correspond to their pain level, with 0mm representing no pain and 100mm representing worst possible pain.
The rate of severe pain will be reported as percentage of patients and will be compared via chi-square test yielding confidence intervals and p-values to assess for significance.
|
All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
|
|
Difference in rate of change of VAS pain scores between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion
Time Frame: All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
|
To compare the rate of change of VAS pain scores between study arms (K2 vs K1 vs K0) at each timepoint during and after IUD insertion (pre-procedure, tenaculum placement, PCB injection, uterine sounding, IUD deployment, overall (measured immediately post-procedure), and 10 minutes post-procedure).
To assess VAS scores, a 100mm ruler will be presented to the patient at the listed timepoints.
The patient will adjust a slider on the ruler to correspond to their pain level, with 0mm representing no pain and 100mm representing worst possible pain.
The pain scores will be plotted at the listed 7 timepoints and a generalized estimating equation will be used to assess the change in slope from timepoint to timepoint.
The change in slope will be reported as means and compared between study arms via repeated measure ANOVA test yielding confidence intervals and p-values and to assess for significance.
|
All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
|
|
Difference in rate of acceptable pain levels between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion
Time Frame: All PASS responses will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
|
To compare the rate of acceptable pain levels (Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) binary yes/no variable) between study arms (K2 vs K1 vs K0) at each timepoint during and after IUD insertion (pre-procedure, tenaculum placement, PCB injection, uterine sounding, IUD deployment, overall (measured immediately post-procedure), and 10 minutes post-procedure).
To assess PASS, the patient will be asked "Do you consider your current pain level acceptable?" at the listed timepoints.
The rate of acceptable pain levels will be reported as percentage of patients and will be compared via chi-square test yielding confidence intervals and p-values to assess for significance.
|
All PASS responses will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amy G Bryant, M.D., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ngo LL, Ward KK, Mody SK. Ketorolac for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000912.
- Crawford M, Davy S, Book N, Elliott JO, Arora A. Oral Ketorolac for Pain Relief During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Dec;39(12):1143-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
- de Oliveira ECF, Baeta T, Brant APC, Silva-Filho A, Rocha ALL. Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01521-z.
- Ngo LL, Braaten KP, Eichen E, Fortin J, Maurer R, Goldberg AB. Naproxen Sodium for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1306-1313. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001746.
- Bednarek PH, Creinin MD, Reeves MF, Cwiak C, Espey E, Jensen JT; Post-Aspiration IUD Randomization (PAIR) Study Trial Group. Prophylactic ibuprofen does not improve pain with IUD insertion: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2015 Mar;91(3):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
- Reeves JA, Zapata LB, Curtis KM, Whiteman MK. Intrauterine Device Training, Attitudes, and Practices Among U.S. Health Care Providers: Findings from a Nationwide Survey. Womens Health Issues. 2023 Jan-Feb;33(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
- Akintomide H, Brima N, Sewell RD, Stephenson JM. Patients' experiences and providers' observations on pain during intrauterine device insertion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2015;20(4):319-26. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1031885. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
- Rahman M, King C, Saikaly R, Sosa M, Sibaja K, Tran B, Tran S, Morello P, Yeon Seo S, Yeon Seo Y, Jacobs RJ. Differing Approaches to Pain Management for Intrauterine Device Insertion and Maintenance: A Scoping Review. Cureus. 2024 Mar 8;16(3):e55785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55785. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 24-2276
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.